the state of relations between crown and parliament by 1629 and reaction of the political nation

Question 1

what did the petitions of rights fail to address?

Answer 1

customs duties, impositions or tonnage and poundage.

Charles favouring anti- Calvinists e.g. William Laud and Richard Montagu who were appointed as bishops in 1628.

Question 2

what were the results of the petition of rights failing to address financial and religious tensions between crown and parliament?

Answer 2

Charles claimed he had not surrendered his right to claim e.g. T+P, customs duties and impositions.
Charles clearly indicts his support for Arminianism

Question 3

in relation to the Petition of rights 1628-why did Parliament not trust Charles?

Answer 3

First, he did not reply to the petition in the proper legal way.
he got the royal printer to deface the statute number- so that there was doubt about its legality.
Parliament were concerned whether Charles could not be trusted with an ambiguous unwritten constitution. Should they try to limit his power in a more formal manner?

Question 4

what was Charles response to the 3 Resolutions 1629?

Answer 4

Dissolved Parliament 2 days later
his leading critics- John Eliot, Holles and Valentine arrested for treason
Charles knew the 3 Res was a revolutionary act
governed the next 11yrs W/O calling parliament

Question 5

how did radicals try to pass the 3 Resolutions?

Answer 5

2.03.1628
Holles and Valentine Held the Speaker in his chair until he passed the resolutions before the royal order was read to suspend parliament. = condemn king’s conduct

Question 6

what are all the possible causes of tension between Charles and the Political Nation?

Answer 6

Religion
Ideology
Charles
Finance
War
Buckingham
Functional reasons