The Righteous Mind - Jonathan Haidt Flashcards
What is the first rule that Jonathan Haidt proposes as to how we should think about the origins/effects of morality?
I. Intuitions come first, strategic reasoning second
II. There’s more to morality than harm and fairness
III. Morality binds and blinds
What is the second rule that Jonathan Haidt proposes as to how we should think about the origins/effects of morality?
I. Intuitions come first, strategic reasoning second
II. There’s more to morality than harm and fairness
III. Morality binds and blinds
What is the third rule that Jonathan Haidt proposes as to how we should think about the origins/effects of morality?
I. Intuitions come first, strategic reasoning second
II. There’s more to morality than harm and fairness
III. Morality binds and blinds
The analogy Jonathan Haidt uses to describe how our minds operate is that our conscious selves are a relatively weak __________ sitting atop a large __________ (the unconscious processes of our minds).
The analogy Jonathan Haidt uses to describe how our minds operate is that our conscious selves are a relatively weak rider sitting atop a large elephant (the unconscious processes of our minds).
True/False.
According to Jonathan Haidt, moral reasoning is almost always predetermined in a logical way.
False.
According to Jonathan Haidt, moral reasoning is often a post hoc fabrication.
(to justify one’s intuitions, emotional or otherwise)
According to Jonathan Haidt, children develop their moral compasses through a combination of both (1) self-construction through their understanding of ______ and also (2) ______ input and guidance.
According to Jonathan Haidt, children develop their moral compasses through a combination of both (1) self-construction through their understanding of harm and also (2) cultural input and guidance.
Of the following, who would Jonathan Haidt say is the most correct?
Plato - reason is the master and should rule over moral intuitions (e.g. moral emotions).
Jefferson - reason and these intuitive processes should co-govern as equal partners.
Hume - reason is the servant of the passions (the intuitive processes).
Hume - reason is the servant of the passions (the intuitive processes).
I.e. our emotional and intuitive processes (the elephant) drive our conscious selves (the riders).
According to Jonathan Haidt, what is the best way to change others’ minds on charged topics?
Speak to their intuitions (the elephant) first
(Don’t just begin with your stance and then try to convince them with supporting evidences; walk them through your intuitions first in order to guide them towards your conclusion.)
Describe Jonathan Haidt’s model of how we, as social beings, come to our moral conclusions.

Who shows more of the beginnings of an understanding of morality, a psychopath (who can reason but not feel) or a baby (who can feel but not reason)?
A baby
(thus, emotive intutions often play into our moral understanding than logical reasoning does)
Which lobe of the brain has been shown to be especially linked up to feelings of disgust and moral dislike?
The insula lobe
(So, gustatory/olfactory senses of disgust map onto similar parts of the brain as moral disgust!)
What philosophical perspective argues that whatever option of action brings the maximum amount of ‘happiness’ or ‘well-being’ to the world of conscious individuals is the most morally correct option?
Utilitarianism
What philosophical perspective follows a careful, logical line of moral reasoning to argue that we have a duty to respect the rights of individuals and follow this as a rule in how we approach our own goals?
Deontology
True/False.
According to Jonathan Haidt, the way we often arrive at our moral reasonings is by developing post hoc explanations for our gut intuitions (initial reactions / emotional judgments), NOT by logically assessing the facts and reaching a conclusion.
True.
What portion of the brain is involved in connecting our emotional reactions to our logical reasoning so we can act morally in the world?
The ventromedial prefrontal cortex
(vmPFC)
If the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is damaged, how does this affect moral actions?
One would be able to understand/logic morals but would lose all emotional reaction, crippling their ability to turn this logic into action
True/False.
According to Jonathan Haidt, brains evaluate instantly and constantly (mostly via conscious processes); social/political judgments depend heavily on long intuitive processes.
False.
According to Jonathan Haidt, brains evaluate instantly and constantly (mostly via unconsciousprocesses); social/political judgments depend heavily onquickintuitiveflashes.
Is most of our concern over how others think about us conscious or unconscious?
(I.e., is social awareness/fear/anxiety/concern/attention attended to more by conscious or unconscious processes?)
Unconscious
Are most of our personal political intuitions groupish (deployed to support our team) or selfish (deployed to support our own reasonings)?
Groupish
(we try to support our teams and demonstrate commitment to the team’s values/goals)
What part of the brain is most involved in tasks involving ‘cool,’ logical reasoning?
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)
What happens neurologically when partisan politicos are ‘released’ from uncomfortable truths about their candidate or party?
Dopamine is released in the ventral striatum
(partisanship is addictive)
Does the evidence show that moral philosophers tend to behave any more ethically than their counterparts who are not moral philosophers?
No.
(The rider being more aware doesn’t necessarily make them more able to tame the elephant.)
True/False.
According to Jonathan Haidt, our moral reasoning is most often used simply to justify the intuitions we have already reached.
(I.e. our rider choosing to go along with what the elephant is already doing.)
True.
According to Jonathan Haidt, why is it important to have a diverse array of intellectual opinions and ideological perspectives in any truth-seeking group (such as a governing board or a group of scientists)?
Our minds are hardwired to find reasonings to support the conclusions we’ve already reached (the rider going along with the elephant). Having diverse opinions present allows us to challenge one another and thus think outside the box in arriving at whatever the truth is (your elephant influences mine in a way my rider can’t).
