The Purges Flashcards

1
Q

what were the purges? what did Getty say?

A

October 1936 witnessed one of the greatest tragedies to strike Russia. Getty stated, “The Great Terror of the 1930s in the Soviet Union was one of the most horrible cases of political violence in modern history.” The Purges saw political and military officials as well as ordinary people brutally murdered, with Stalin orchestrating events under the guise of justice. Anyone who remotely opposed Stalin and his party were targeted and sent to gulags after unfair trials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what were the reasons for the purges?

A

officially, the death or Kirov, a beloved politician was the reason why they happened but that doesn’t explain why over 20 million people were killed. other, more plausible theory’s have been given such as Stalin’s paranoia, his desire to control the party and even NKVD involvement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why was there tensions within the party before the purges?

A

There were many tensions within the Communist Party prior to the Purges as many were opposed to Stalin’s ideas and he resented the party’s power to out-vote him. One such opponent was Ryutin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what did ryutin do?

A

In 1932, the former Moscow party secretary circulated a 200 page document (which became widely known as the Ryutin Platform) that criticised Stalin and his leadership. He stated that Stalin is the “evil genius of the Russian Revolution” highlighting his “personal dictatorship”, and called for Stalin’s removal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how did he react? how did that turn out for him?

A

Outraged, Stalin demanded the death penalty for such an insult however, the Politburo disagreed and outvoted him, allowing Ryutin to continue his slander of Stalin. This was a massive blow to Stalin’s ego and made him realise he was still subject to democracy and did not have the power he wanted within the party to execute any order he wished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what else did Ryutin say?

A

. Within his document, Ryutin called out Stalin’s tendency towards being power hungry stating “Stalin and his clique will not and cannot voluntarily give up their positions, so they must be removed by force.” This highlights that Stalin would never step down from his position and therefore force would be necessary to remove him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does this show if it’s true?

A

Furthermore, if this is true, it is evident that Stalin would do anything to maintain control, even if that involved eliminating those that could pose a threat to him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

why is the desire to gain control over the Party the most important factor?

A

The potential to gain control over the Party through the purges is clearly the most important factor as it can be used to explain all of Stalin’s actions. He had always been hungry for complete control and any threat had to be eliminated and made an example of.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how did Stalin control the party?

A

Stalin used fear and terror to his political gain, not only to make himself sole leader of the Communist Party, but also to make sure no one dared question him lest they face imprisonment or execution and that worked; he remained in office right up until his death in 1953.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

why do a select few believe the Purges weren’t completely Stalin’s fault? who believe this?

A

While there are many differing opinions on the origin of the Purges, most agree on one thing; Stalin was responsible for orchestrating them. However, a select few such as Nove and Fiehn believe the purges were not entirely Stalin’s fault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does Nove say?

A

Nove believes that although the purges were Stalin’s decision, it was over-zealous hands wanting to fulfil numbers that meant the numbers arrested went up. This suggests that Stalin did not plan the purges as they actually unfolded, it implies Stalin’s authority was so imposing that, in an attempt to please him and protect themselves from arrest, young Bolsheviks arrested more people than necessary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why would it be in their best interests to conduct the purges with vigour?

A

Stalin had direct responsibility over the NKVD within Russia and it was therefore in their best interest to conduct the Purges with extreme vigour to ensure Stalin would protect their authority. There were calls for the limitation of the NKVD’s powers from old Bolsheviks like Smirnov who, if given the right platform, could have reduced their powers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what would this have led them to do?

A

This fear may have led the NKVD to target those capable of restricting their power by purging more people than originally intended thus ensuring no one could limit their abilities apart from Stalin, who at that point posed no threat to the NKVD.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how is it still Stalin’s fault?

A

however, Stalin was in charge of the NKVD and their actions were his responsibility, he should have known what was happening and put a stop to it. While this does not absolve the NKVD of blame, they were following orders and were well aware of the horrific consequences should they disobey - Stalin’s responsibility for the Purges cannot be ignored.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what could be the origins of Stalin’s paranoia?

A

The origins of Stalin’s paranoia may be traced back to his relationship with Lenin towards the end of his life. After a series of strokes, Lenin focused his attention on issues within the party and his legacy, noting Stalin’s growing power, Lenin became increasingly aware of the threat he posed. Lenin began to doubt the information he received from Stalin (how much he knew of this is unclear) but Lenin’s sudden interest worried him as he also learned from his wife that Lenin was working closely with Trotsky.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what would have happened had Lenin lived any longer? why do we think this?

A

It is clear that if Lenin had lived any longer, Stalin would have lost his powerful positions within the party. Their relationship met its breaking point when Stalin tried to visit Lenin. Krupskaya, Lenin’s wife, refused Stalin access. He responded by insulting her harshly down the telephone; this resulted in Lenin adding a postscript to the testament he wrote to be read upon his death after a stroke left him unable to speak:

17
Q

what did the post scrip read? why was this bad for Stalin?

A

“I propose to the comrades that a way be found to remove Stalin from that post and replace him with someone else who differs from Stalin in all respects” this planted a seed of doubt in everyone’s mind including Stalin’s regarding Stalin’s abilities.

18
Q

what did Cohen say?

A

Cohen believes that Stalin feared the long serving Bolsheviks could now see he was not Lenin’s equal and so wanted to rid himself and the party of these members before they could challenge him. Stalin was afraid he was not up to the standard that Lenin set before him, and worse, that his enemies knew this, therefore the easiest course of action was to remove anyone who posed a threat to him.

19
Q

how does his paranoia factor into the purges?

A

his paranoid state may have acted as a push for the purges, but it is clear that his actions were all motivated by the advancement of his career and control over the party as there is no evidence to suggest that he was not of sound mind and his actions appeared well thought out and expertly manoeuvred to make him appear guiltless.

20
Q

what happened shortly before his assassination?

A

Shortly before his assassination, Kirov experienced a surge in popularity, gaining more votes than Stalin at the Seventeenth Party Congress, 10th February 1934. Here he frequently disagreed with Stalin on many issues including: the rate of industrialisation, reconciliation with the peasants (and the relaxation of terror) and the role of the NKVD. This made Kirov a target for Stalin who would stop at nothing to secure his power.

21
Q

what happened with Nikolayev before the assassination? what does this tell us?

A

The man who assassinated Kirov was arrested in Kirov’s neighbourhood multiple times before the murder and was bailed each time by Zaporozhets (NKVD deputy) which further suggests the killing was premeditated by forces other than a lone assassin.

22
Q

what did he suggest during his interrogation?what does this suggest?

A

After the murder, Nikolayev was immediately arrested and interrogated by Stalin himself. When asked why Kirov was targeted, he replied that the NKVD should be consulted on that question implying they were somehow involved.

23
Q

what did Lyushkov say? how isn’t this reliable?

A

Of course, there were some who would attempt to pin the blame solely on Nikolayev, Lyushkov, one of his interrogators stated “he lacked balance, he had many problems… He was convinced that he was capable of any work… . This discontent in turn drove him into his scheme to assassinate some important figures in the part.” However, Lyushkov was part of the NKVD making him biased towards that organisation, and to Stalin, making him an unreliable source.

24
Q

how important was the Kirov murder in the beginning of the Purges?

A

It is clear Stalin had something to do with the murder of Kirov. he threatened Stalin’s position of power and he decided to do something about it. The assassination of Kirov was not the main reason for the Purges; although it gave Stalin an excuse to begin the Purges, the motives behind the murder of Kirov were clearly politically motivated.