October Revolution Flashcards

1
Q

what was Russia like after the fall of Tsarism?

A

After the fall of Tsarism, Russian society was in constant flux and this did not change when the Provisional Government were in charge. This mixture of unrest and continual discontent led to an arguable second revolution in October 1917. The Bolsheviks then seized control of the government and after some time, eventually stabilised Russia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the main line of thought as to why the Oct Rev happened?

A

However, the reasons behind their great success has been widely debated among historians. The general line of thought presents itself as being because of Lenin’s strong April thesis and power of persuasion as being the reason why the Bolsheviks gained so much support; such is the view of Read who claims Lenin was a key figure within the revolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are other reasons?

A

Although, other reasons for their success such as the weakness of the provisional government, the weakness of the other parties within Russia and mistakes by Kerensky have been giving alternative rational behind the October Revolution but ultimately, not quite encapsulating an undeniable motive behind their party’s success.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

when Lenin arrived in Petrograd, what did he present? what were the key things within this?

A

Lenin returned to Russia in April 1917 after spending months away in exile. Upon arrival to the Finland Station in Petrograd, he was greeted by a cheering crowd and it was here when he presented his now iconic ‘April Thesis’ where he called for a worldwide socialist revolution, an immediate end to the war, an end to co-operation with the Provisional Government, all power to the soviets and land to be given to the peasants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what else did he hit out with? what was its impact?

A

He also hit out with what would be his slogan for the rest of his reign: “Bread, Peace and Land.” The impact of his speech was immense, creating undeniable support for him and the Bolsheviks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did sukhanov say? what does this show?

A

Sukhanov, a Menshevik internationalist diarist of the revolution states in his diary “Suddenly, before the eyes of all of us, completely swallowed up by the routine drudgery of the Revolution, there was presented a bright beacon” this first-hand account of the speech highlights many different aspects to not only Lenin’s speech but day to day life in Russia since the revolution.It presents Russia as a grim and depressing place to live in post-revolution, giving reason to the overwhelming positive reaction to Lenin who was providing an opportunity for a better life for the Russian peoples.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does this show?

A

This shows that Lenin was an extremely influential asset to the Bolshevik party as he was easily able to appeal to the workers and soldiers whose expectations and demands were becoming more radical and were moving far ahead of the Provisional Government and soviet to satisfy their needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

were there people who disagreed with him? who and why?

A

However, there were many working against Lenin and many, such as the peasants who were generally apathetic, whom he could not persuade. The Mensheviks were not fans of Lenin’s and would actively slander him and his policies. While delivering this thesis at the meeting of the Social Democrats, they were faced with many boos and heckles from the Mensheviks who claimed they were abandoning the true policies of Marx.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how did the thesis differ from other ideas? what does this show?

A

The thesis was more radical than anything proposed before and many believed he had lived abroad for too long and was out of touch, his ideas were even opposed by members of the Bolshevik Central Committee. This displays that although Lenin could appeal to many of the working class and inspire them to join his side, he still had trouble getting those politicians he’d need to convince in order to make his Thesis a reality on board with his ideas which could have been a very large problem for Lenin if he wasn’t the kind of man he was.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

did Lenin prevail regardless? what does this show?

A

By the end of the month, Lenin’s personality and powers of persuasion ensured that the April Thesis became part of the party policy, further inspiring those it was directed at to become more and more radicalised before eventually taking the government and beginning the October revolution. This further conveys Lenin’s crucial role with the Party and innate ability of persuasion without whom, the October revolution may not have even happened as quickly as it did.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how was it doomed from the beginning?

A

From the very beginning, the Provisional Government was doomed as it took control during a time of extreme hardship for Russia due to an incompetent Tsar, an unstable country and WW1 still raging on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why did many not like or trust the PG?

A

Many people opposed the Provisional government outright as they were not elected by the people and filled with members of the middle class and therefore the working class and soldiers felt that it was more directed at the middle class and they were going to be left out, much like it was during the Tsar’s reign.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how did they attempt to appeal to everyone? how did this create problems?

A

In attempts to keep the people content, the Provisional Government decided to work with the Soviet and Alexander Kerensky acting as their buffer. This provided its own, new, set of issues as both bodies operated differently, where the Provisional government was made up of only leading figures from the Kadets and other liberal Parties, the Petrograd soviet was made up of workers and soldiers representatives and socialist intellectuals mainly Mensheviks and socialist revolutionaries resulting in hundreds of people being a part of the soviet.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how did this impact decision making?

A

This made decision making between the two an extremely long and difficult process proving that the new government was weak to begin with as it was disliked by the largest section of the population and in that extremely unstable and revolution prone country, that was an extremely dangerous thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was the ‘honeymoon’ period?

A

The ‘honeymoon’ period proved fruitful however as both bodies had very little conflict and achieved much. Together they placed Tsarist ministers and officials under arrest, disbanded the secret police, granted an amnesty for political and religious prisoners, established freedom of the press and speech and abolished the death penalty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how did this change? what did service say?

A

The governments appeared to be working fine together but from those two months, the state they were in went downhill very quickly. Robert Service stated “for most of the year the Provisional Government survived on guile and rhetoric.” Highlighting their inadequacy as they weren’t there through good work or through the will of the people, but out of being sly and persuasive which could only last so long.

17
Q

how was it inevitable that they disintigrated? what did Rabinowitch say?

A

Due to their inability to agree on anything and apathy towards the national minorities who wanted to become independent, it was inevitable that they disintegrated Rabinowitch said that the long term causes of unrest made “the desire for an end to the coalition government nearly universal.” Further displaying the severe discontentment with the Provisional Government that eventually led to what was arguably an easy takeover by the Bolsheviks. Furthermore, this resulted in the appointment of Kerensky to fix the issue, only leading directly to the collapse of the government and October revolution due to his countless mistakes.

18
Q

what did people think Kerensky would do?

A

when Alexander Kerensky became prime minister in 1917, he was viewed as the man who would unite and fix Russia due to his connections to both the soviet and Provisional government.

19
Q

what was he really like?

A

however, he was very vain and held himself too highly, therefore he was prone to making terrible decisions, most notable of which was appointing Kornolov as the new supreme commander of the Russian forces.

20
Q

how did this backfire?

A

Kerensky’s trust in Kornolov backfired dramatically when Kornolov used this opportunity to establish a military control within Russia. Worried that he would lose power, Kerensky denounced Kornolov attempting to appeal to the Soviet for help, but this only served to expose Kerensky’s weakness

21
Q

how did this end up benefiting the Bolsheviks?

A

By supplying the Red Guard with weapons to solve his problems, Kerensky inadvertently helped restore the Bolsheviks’ reputation from their previous blunders in the July days. They were now viewed as saviours of the revolution and were elected in large numbers to the Petrograd soviet, gaining overall control in September 1917. This Bolshevik dominated soviet would ultimately approve plans for the Bolshevik seizure in October.

22
Q

what did Kowalski say?

A

Kowalski noted that the system was merely victim to “a number of unpredictable accidents and improbable coincidences… such as the attempted Coup by general Kornolov.” suggesting that Kerensky’s mistakes were not the reason for the fall of the Provisional Government and the October revolution.

23
Q

how did this ruin his career and end his reign within the government and impact the events in October?

A

However, with his reputation in tatters, the Government no longer respected or trusted him and anyone associated with him were discredited. He was loathed by the left and distrusted by the right. Consequentially, they were not prepared to defend Kerensky and the Provisional Government in October resulting in the Bolshevik takeover.

24
Q

what is an obvious question?

A

An obvious question is why none of the other parties were able to provide a real challenge to the Bolsheviks for leadership of either revolution, or why it was so easy for the Bolsheviks in the first place.

25
Q

what is one reason?

A

It could be because they believed that the February revolution was genuine and long lasting, making sense for all of them to co-operate with the Provisional Government, which claimed to represent serious change within Russia. This resulted in revolutionist parties such as the socialist revolutionaries entering into coalition with the Kadets, the dominant party within the government in order to achieve some political advantage. Although, Lenin was able to use this to his advantage, stating that they had ‘sold out to the bourgeoisie’ which proved a powerful propaganda tool when October came.

26
Q

what is another reason?

A

Another explanation could be the damage that war support caused their image within the Russian people. None of them opposed the war as consistently as Lenin and the Bolsheviks after the revolution, the other partied regarded it was Russia’s duty to defeat the enemy. The SRs, Mensheviks and even some Bolsheviks believed in fighting in what they saw was the war against the German bourgeoisie. This acted to solidify Lenin’s April Thesis and his slogan of “bread, peace and land” became more common as the people wanted to end the war more and more due to the increasingly high casualty count.

27
Q

how was the political atmosphere after the fall of Tsarism?

A

Within tsarist Russia there were a severe lack of traditional politics and when Tsarism fell, many political partied found that they were free to spread their beliefs but there was no accepted code of conduct they could follow and the art of negotiation and compromise were unheard of in Russia resulting in a lot of political chaos.

28
Q

what did Lenin say? how was the Bolsheviks appealing?

A

enin expressed this simply as “who? Whom?” referring to ‘who’ was in charge and over ‘whom’ were they in charge of, democracy had no place in this society. It was a matter of who was the most ruthless and flexible to which the Bolsheviks under Lenin fit perfectly; they appealed to a very large demographic and therefore prevailed in October when they eventually seized power.

29
Q

why were the other parties inferior to the Bolsheviks?

A

The weakness of all of the other partied to be fluid and compromise is why they did not get initial power, although the Bolsheviks had an ‘iron fist’ after power was seized, it was that flexibility they displayed that appealed to the masses and ensured that their rise to power was inevitable.