The origin of the English Civil War Part 1 Flashcards
The significance of Charles I’s marriage 1625
It was significant due to the substantial dowry of £120,000 that accompanied it, which would be essential for the war against Spain.
Suspicions arising on religion from the Queen
Henrietta Maria could enjoy the freedom of worship as Catholics, but that the recusancy laws were being relaxed in a way that MPs found alarming.
Madrid wooing 1623-1624
It contributed to the widespread distrust of the court on religious matters, particularly in the context of Charles’s pro-Arminian stance.
Buckingham’s power
He enjoyed a seamless transition of power that confounded his enemies, a tribute to his political skill.
The negative effect of Buckingham on Charles and Parliament’s relationship
Many felt that Buckingham was closely directing Charles. He was politically over-dominant, through patronage, and he was also militarily incompetent.
Charles’s ideas of royal authority
Charles believed that the King had the power to make decisions that were beyond the competence of Parliament.
Opposition to the Divine Right - Parliament
MPs saw monarchical power removed Parliament’s independent authority and subject Parliament to the royal will
What did the Puritans seen Arminians as
worse than Catholics because they were the ‘enemy within’
Charles view on Arminianism
Charles’s vision of kingship meant that Arminianism was fine due to its emphasis on hierarchy and ceremony being in line with him.
James I’s approach in religious policy
James was rather pragmatic on religious policy due to his experience in dealing with the confrontational and uncompromising attitude of Scottish Presbyterians.
Significance of the Montague controversy of 1625
showed that Charles indifference to the fears of politically influential Puritan MPs in the House of Commons, and the way in which he would react to an apparent ‘affront’ from Parliament by becoming openly confrontation himself.
Charles began his reign at war with Spain meant that (financially)
It gave Parliament considerable political leverage over Charles, as he had to call three Parliaments in four year.
Parliament attempted to restrict the king’s power
Parliament was acting in provocative and confrontational fashion by voting only two subsidies, which worth £14,000 in total, and voting Tonnage and Poundage for just one year.
Success in the Forced Loan 1625
The Forced Loan raised more money for the King than the four parliamentary subsidies would have done, and was collected in the face of opposition.
What was Charles’s thought on the Forced Loan in 1625
It prompted Charles to think that finance could be raised more efficiently without the uncertainty, delay and expense of calling Parliament.
What was wrong with Forced Loan of 1625
It challenged Parliament’s role in voting taxation because taxation without consent undermined Parliament’s most important privilege. It was also going against the principle stated in the Magna Carta in 1215