The Nature of Evil and Suffering Flashcards
1
Q
Atheist Approach
A
- Evil is convincing evidence that God does not exist.
- A loving God would not have created a universe so full of evil and suffering.
- There is no God.
- Iris Murdoch: (In ‘A Severed Head’: “I cannot imagine any omnipotent sentient being sufficiently cruel to create the world we inhabit.”
2
Q
Buddhist Approach
A
- Our view of evil is distorted.
- Evil is an illusion brought about by human greed and selfishness.
- Evil is a result of past karmic actions.
- We cause our own suffering by forming attachments to greed , desire, passion and popularity.
- One can overcome suffering by stopping such cravings.
3
Q
Hindu Approach
A
- Evil is an illusion brought about by human greed and selfishness.
- Hindus believe all suffering is the result of evil committed in a previous life.
- Evil and Suffering can be overcome by doing good for others.
4
Q
Monist Approach
A
- There is no evil.
- The universe is a single harmonious unity that is good.
- Evil is a mere illusion in our minds.
- Evil is not something that God has deliberately created
- Evil is simply the absence of good.
5
Q
Zoroastrianism Approach:
A
1 . Assumes that the universe is a battlefield on which the Principle of Good and the Principle of Evil fight for supremacy.
- Vardy argues that such dualist notions can be seen as a cosmic battle.
- “If someone believes in two Gods, one of whom is good and the other of whom is evil, then this entails a Cosmic Dualism”
6
Q
Monotheistic Religion’s Approach
A
- No suggestion that evil is an illusion.
- Scriptures tell of the mixture of good and evil in human experience.
- Evil is utterly bad and entirely real.
- The Bible does not attempt to underestimate the reality of evil and suffering.
- New Testament: suffering is a crucial part of the ministry of Jesus. (God takes on human sin through genuine suffering.)
7
Q
Nature of Evil and Suffering (Summary)
A
- Atheist
- Monist
- Buddhist
- Hindu
- Monotheistic Religion Approach
- Zoroastrianist Approach