Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Paper 1 > The nature of belief > Flashcards

The nature of belief Flashcards

1
Q

describe the supporters of fideism and their arguments, briefly

A
  1. Pascal’s wager - beneficial to believe
  2. Plantinga- faith is a properly basic belief
  3. Wittgenstein- the language of faith is separate from others
    - R.M Hare: Bliks ‘set of profoundly unfalsifiable assumptions’ we have when viewing the world/
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

objections to plantinga?

A

atheists have no sense of divine,

Peter Vardy: all sorts of belief are basic, eg the great pumpkin objection

disanalogy objection - beliefs need affirmation by evidence (Richard Grigg - I saw a tree)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

objections to pascal’s wager

A
  1. it is a selfish ethic - William James
  2. one cannot will to believe something eg clergy project
  3. Denis Diderot- reliance on Xn god/what if it’s a muslim god BUT could show atheism is irrational
  4. arguably you lose pleasure by believing in an unreal god
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

objections to wittgenstein

A
  1. xns would not believe that the bible is not in fact a historical narrative
  2. John Searle- thinking no god is listening to prayers would not work as seen in experimental xn societies
  3. Essentially only appeals to atheists
  4. Many believers make factual assertions like creationists, so more than just a ‘difference in attitude’ like Wisdom argues.
  5. Antony Flew - beliefs are unfalsifiable and therefore meaningless; Fideists shift the goal posts of God.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explain Wittgenstein’s argument

A

language and practice of faith is totally separate from those of science and reason
religion performs a different function in society
PHILLIPS AND KAI NELSEN: religion is logically cut off from other aspects of life
JOHN WISDOM’s parable of the invisible gardener shows that evidence can lead to different conclusions
R.M Hare’s ‘Bliks’ ‘profoundly unfalsifiable assumptions’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the four people who supported strong rationalism?

A

Clifford, Locke, Hume, Peterson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 4 criticisms to Clifford’s rationalism

A
  1. WILLIAM JAMES: “the fact that a belief works is evidence enough”- pragmatic and beneficial; what if neither decision has sufficient evidence?
  2. BRYAN DAVIES: evidence and sufficient very slippery terms
  3. is clifford’s belief grounded in evidence? circular
  4. God is transcendent, omnipotent- how do we apply logic to immeasurable truths?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

describe locke and hume’ positions

A

Locke: we have a duty to do our best in matters of belief
Hume: faith without reason is not sufficient grounds for a belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

4 points of discussions on nature of belief

A
  1. Neutrality - is reason really neutral
  2. ask a fideistic if he has reason for his faith ….
  3. Faith is a leap, which one to take? relates to pascal’s wager
  4. common sense dictates reason can’t be ignored
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

who supports critical rationalism and what is its objection

A
  1. Augustine - understanding is reward of faith - we don’t need it to believe, but might help others to understand
  2. Aquinas- some truths about god are beyond reason, some are not
  3. Pascal- submitting everything to reason leaves no mystery but blind faith is absurd
    Objection: a critical rationalist will never reach a decisive conclusion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

clifford’s quote?

A

“in all cases, it is wrong to believe something on insufficient evidence”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

quote from pascal that can be linked to neutrality of reason?

A

“the heart has its reasons that reason knows nothing about”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Plantinga’s reformed epistemology

A

Faith is a properly basic belief - warranted because no successful defeat era, and self authenticating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Aquinas on propositional revelation?

A

Emphasised using reason to learn about god from the natural world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strengths of propositional view

A

Viewing bible as sola scriptura makes bible infallible and inerrant

Helpful framework for living

Can be trusted and relied on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weaknesses of propositional view

A

Circular argument (self-authenticating)

Weak conviction that truths about God can be coveted in ordinary language

The truth or falsity of religion turns on whether certain propositions are true.

Historically inaccurate eg moses texts written years after him & Contradictions in the bible - an eye for an eye vs turn the other cheek

Richard Hayes: “the interpretation of scripture can never occur in a vacuum” - psychologically we cannot receive knowledge passively

Karl Barth: literalism could give bible divine status that can only be given to god: this is bibliolatry - false worship of the bible

Impossible to use all the rules of the bible - too complex or obscure and too demanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Schleirermacher on non propositional?

A

The bible is the result of writers reflecting on their RE

Religion is about ones subjective response to the infinite, not just obeying a set of truth
- revelation is the product of an active relationship of believer and god

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Bultmann?

A

Believer has to work out for themselves what is revelatory in scripture and what isn’t, in light of the scientifically true
This demythologises the bible to get to its central truths and narratives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Barth?

A

Bible isn’t the word of god but contain is - everything must be understood through gods revelation in Christ

20
Q

Salvation history

A

The view that the bible is a record of peoples experiences of the divine and so must be understood in different cultural contexts

21
Q

Criticisms of non propositional

A

You can know little about god

Problem of eisegesis- can read meaning into a text

Result of human understanding and can’t reveal anything direct about god

22
Q

Anthony Flew - Religion is Unfalsifiable so God dies a ‘death of a thousand qualifications’.

A

Karl Popper: “science is more concerned with falsification of hypothesis than with the verification.” Influenced by Karl Popper, Antony Flew applied the Falsification Principle to religious language and concluded that religious statements are nothing more than non-sensical utterances of little significance.

23
Q

Objections to Fideism and RE

A
  • they can’t distinguish between rational and trivial beliefs, since any attempt to justify some beliefs as acceptable and to reject others presupposes some form of rational judgment
  • Common sense seems to suggest that our human capacity for reason must be used to test competing claims.
24
Q

Hick’s definition of revelation

A

‘The disclosure from the divine of something previously hidden’

25
Q

2 Timothy 3:16

A

‘All scripture is God-breathed’

26
Q

Richard Hays

A

‘The interpretation of scripture can never occur in a vacuum’

27
Q

W. Alston? (reformed epistemologist)

A

We are biased (in a good way) by the context inside of which we can actually understand / make intelligible a mystical experience.
E.g an apparition to a Hindu is more likely to be Krishna than Jesus.

Mystical experiences occur in a narrative matrix

28
Q

Buddhist Scripture ( one of exams reports commented on no one talking about it !)

A

Tipitaka - Buddhist discourse not divinely inspired but read thoughtfully and respectfully. Offers guidance without being seen as inerrant.

29
Q

Hermeneutics

A

To understand something new we need to interpret based on what we already know // circular
hermeneutics is about the ways you discover meaning in the Bible for your life and your era, faithfully taking its intents into today’s world

30
Q

Errors in the bible?

A
  • haplography (missing out letters)
  • dittography (extra letters)
  • historical mistakes
31
Q

What does Inspired mean?

A
  • comes from Greek ‘theopneustos’ meaning ‘God-breathed’ recalling genesis 2:7
32
Q

What is the Prophetic Formulae?

A

‘Thus says the Lord..’

33
Q

Why is the belief in the Great Pumpkin not properly basic?

A

Plantinga says: ‘God has implanted in us a natural tendency to see his hand in the world around us. The same can not be said for the Great Pumpkin.’

34
Q

What does exegesis mean?

A

Exegesis is what comes out of the Bible, as against what gets read into it.

35
Q

What does Eisegesis mean?

A

Eisegesis is what’s being done when someone interprets the Bible according to notions that were born outside of the Bible. In eisegesis, we read stuff into Scripture

36
Q

What is the hermeneutic circle?

A

refers to the idea that one’s understanding of the text as a whole is established by reference to the individual parts and one’s understanding of each individual part by reference to the whole - circular

37
Q

RM Hare on Bliks

A

‘A set of profoundly unfalsifiable assumptions’

38
Q

Kierkegaard’s fideism

A

‘Precisely because we cannot know Good objectively, we must believe’

  • Lutheran ideas of ‘sola fixes’
  • fear & trembling (homage to Abraham’s intensely faithful actions)
39
Q

Atkins?

A

The ‘why’ questions, so attractive to a religious life, are simply invented.

40
Q

What does Anthony Flew argue in ‘The Presumption of Atheism’?

A

we assume something doesn’t exist (e.g the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn’t exist) unless we have warrant to do otherwise.

41
Q

What does Steven Cahn argue?

A

Believers have no need for proof of god’s existence. Believers have to have ‘self-validating experiences’ to accept god.

42
Q

Tertullian quotation?

A

Credo Quia absurdum

43
Q

Faith in propositional revelation is…

A

An act of rational / intellectual assent

44
Q

What authenticates truths Roman Catholics assent too?

A

Truths are authenticated by The collective mind and experience of the RC Church

45
Q

What authenticates scriptural truths for Protestants?

A

For Protestants, scriptural truths are generally self-authenticating because they come from God, or they are authenticated by the conscience.

46
Q

The question of religious ‘truth’

A
  • truth is relative
  • scientific truth is of a different order from religious truth so religious truth doesn’t had to hang on propositional views of revelation
  • scientific truth in terms of quantum physics is elusive
  • religion is a language game in which truth is defined by the user
  • truth is an anti-real concept anyway

Paper 1 (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions