The Legal System - Paper 1 Section A Flashcards
county courts
civil court
- most civil claims up to £100,000
- negligence, tresspassing, debt, housing
- open court with a single judge
- less legal argument
- judge decideds compensation
appeal from county court to high court
civil courts
can go if its relevant to any section
appeal route from county court to court of appeal
civil court
- goes if raises a point of principle
- heard by circuit judge if orginally heard by district judge (&other way round)
high court - kings bench
civil court
- over £100,000
- more complicated laws
- hear case stated appeals and application reviews
high court - chancery division
civil court
- buisness, property, land & partnerships
- claims and disputes over trust
high court - family
civil court
- heard privately - sensitive
- child marrage, abduction, forced marriage
- if happens outside of country they will still hear it
appeal route from high court to court of appeal
civil courts
- national important
- sufficent importance (leapfrog)
court of appeal
civil court
- leal grounds
- rare for new evidence to be heard
- has to be made within 21 days
- can change or agree with decision
appeal route from court of appeal to supreme court
- only goes if permission is granted
- national importance
supreme court
civil court
- only if genreal public are involved or new law
- 12 judges in whole court
3 track sytem - small claims
civil court
- under £10,000
- under £1000 in injury
- max 2-3hrs
- no lawyers
- informal
- county court
3 track system - fast track
civil court
- £10,000-£25,000
- £50,000 in injury
- 30 days
- open court for 1 day
- county court
3 track system - multi track
civil court
- £25,000-£50,000
- no time limit
- formal
- over £50,000 in injury
- judge sets timetable ect
pre court procedures
civil court
- alternative dispute resolution- way to solve dispute without court
- pre action protocols- prepare documents ect that the court expect
- which court to use- dpends on the claim
- issuing a claim- N1 form , a fee to pay for claim
- defending claim- dispute claim or amit liability
- track allocation- go to one of the three tracks
employment tribunals
civil court
- prelimary matters-claim must be made within 3 months - contract arbitration service - see if there is a resolution - claim passed to employer
- the hearing- held in indiviudual rooms - hear evidence in full or partial - might decide on day or in writing
- appeal- 42 days to appeal, court of appeal or supreme court
ADR - negotiation
civil court
- two parties talk prior to the court
- no third party
- two s
- solicters can do it whilst in court
+ quick & cheap
- unlikely to reach an agreement
ADR - mediation
civil court
- talk about dispute to an indepent 3rd party
- doesnt give opinions
- used lots in family law
ADR - conciliation
civil court
- talk about dispute to 3rd party but 3rd party can give sugestion on how to solve
- parties are together so may cause trauma and damadge relationships
arbitration
civil court
-
arbitration act 1996 (section 1)
* obtain fair resoltion of dispute without delay
* parties decide who they work with
* if they cant decide the court appoints it themselve (section 18) - arbitration by contract - scott v avery clause - cant sue until you have done arbitration
- arbitration act 1996 (section 9)- court can order a stay if you dont follow arbitration rules
evaluations of ADR
civil court
-
advantages
* less hostile
* parties have more control
* cheaper and more flexable
* experts in area -
disadvantages
* not legally binding (dont have to follow)
* emotionally stressful
* unproductive
* no appeal route
evaluations of civil courts
civil court
-
advantages
* productive
* in public interest
* impartial judge
* good appeal route -
disadvantages
* hostile
* lenghty complex rules
* slow - could get worst
* judge is not specialised
advantages of arbitration
civil court
- parties can choose arbitrater - section 1 - gain confidence and takes away bias - process is easier
- private - public image is kept - big buisness can still carry on and not loose profit
- award enforced through court - legally binding
- reduce court workload - more thorrow procedings as they have the time
disadvanatages of arbitration
civil court
- no legal aid- those who cant afford wont get the same justice
- may be forced into it due to contract- more stress on those who dont want to go into it
- no appeal route- if not fair then you cant appeal - waste of money
- not always in publics best intrest- if involes public they wont find infomation out and can become restless
summary offence
criminal court
- magitrates court
- vandilsm, battery, assult, speeding
triable either way offence
criminal court
- magistrates/crown court
- theft, ABH
indictable
criminal court
- crown court
- murder, manslaughter, GBH, treason
magistrates court
criminal court
- summares all cases - deals with first hearings
- warrents for arrest and youth courts
- small offences
appeal route for magistrates to crown court
criminal court
- if pleaded guilty you can only appeal sentence
- if pleaded not guilty you can appeal sentence and conviction
- judge and 2 magistrates
- can only change sentence to magistrates maxium powers
appeal route from magistrates to high court
criminal court
- magistrates make lots of mistakes of law
- can confirm, vary or reverse sentence
crown court
criminal court
- triable either way or indcitable offences
- plead gulity only a judge
- plead not guilty a judge and jury
appeal route from crown court to high court
criminal court
- by defendant- defendant must obtain leave - consider if new evidence would be admissable
- by prosecutor- if jury was knobbled - new evidence in the intrest on the public
high court
criminal court
can only try a case through the appeal route
appeal route from the high court to the supreme court
criminal court
- only if brings point of law or national importance
court of appeal
criminal court
- decrease on increase sentence
- allow, quash or dismiss
- try with new jury
appeal route from court of appeal to supreme court
criminal court
- if point of law is involved
- must get leave
supreme court
criminal court
- very unlikely
- R V P (1919) - new law where raping your wife is a crime
pre trial procedures - summary offence
criminal court
- first hearing- clerk takes name, adress and plea
- plead guilty- consider sentence, hear what defendant has to say, annouce sentence
- plead not guilty- magistates will try to discover the issue and set a trial date
pre trial procedures - triable either way
criminal court
- first hearing- hear plea
- plead guilty- automatically sent to magistates and decide sentence
-
plead not guilty- 1. magistrates decide where the case goes - defendant cant request crown court
2. mode of trial- magistrates make decison where to go - look at law complexity - breach of trust and orgnised crime goes straight to crown court
3. if accepted- defendant can decide magistates o crown court if they have a choice
pre trial procedures - indictable
criminal court
- first hearing- magistrates take defendants identity and decide bail or custody and legal aid
- crown court- “arraign” the defendant (take plea)- set trial date and timetable
aims of sentencing - punishment and retribution
criminal court
- mean of revenge or vengence
- prison or heavy fine
aims of sentencing - deterrance
criminal court
- discourage future criminal acts through fear of consequence
- prison , heavy fine , community service (max 300hr)
aims of sentencing - reform and rehabilitation
criminal court
- criminal behavouir back to normal through support
- community service, suspended prison sentence
aims of sentencing - protection of the public
criminal court
- criminal makes amends for their actions
- fine , community service
aims of sentencing - denuciation
criminal court
- public or judical condemnation through punishment
- prison, heavy fine or community sentence
factors in sentencing - aggravating
criminal court
- previous convictions
- racial, relegious, disabilities or sexual oritation
- pleaded not guilty
- theft - how much theyve stollen
- assult - extent of injury
- wether several offenders are convicted - who played biggest part
factors in sentencing - mitigation
criminal court
- no previous convictions
- shows genuine remorse
- taking minor part in the offence
- mental illnes or disability
- pleading guilty
other factors in sentencing
criminal court
- previous convictions
- pre-sentence report
- medical report
- finacial situations
- sentecning guidlines
types of sentencing (custodial sentence) - suspened sentence
criminal court
- dont go to prison if they comply to rules and no more offences
types of sentencing (custodial sentence) - manditory life sentence
criminal court
- 21 or older is convicted of murder is sentenced to 10 life sentences
types of sentencing (custodial sentence) - discretionary sentence
criminal court
- manslaughter
- GBH
- rape
types of sentencing (custodial sentence) - fixed term sentence
criminal court
- determate sentence with fixed length of time
types of sentencing (custodial sentence) - intermittent sentence
criminal court
- the sentence is served on an intermittent basis
types of sentencing (custodial sentence) - minimum sentence
criminal court
- 7 years for 3rd class drugs
- 3ys for 3rd buglary
types of sentencing (community order) -unpaid work requirement
criminal court
- 40-300hrs of unpaid work to charity
types of sentencing (community order) - activity requirments
criminal court
- under go training or education to gain qualifitcation
types of sentencing (community order) - programe requirment
criminal orders
- programe which is desgined to adress behavour