The Legal System - Paper 1 Section A Flashcards
county courts
civil court
- most civil claims up to £100,000
- negligence, tresspassing, debt, housing
- open court with a single judge
- less legal argument
- judge decideds compensation
appeal from county court to high court
civil courts
can go if its relevant to any section
appeal route from county court to court of appeal
civil court
- goes if raises a point of principle
- heard by circuit judge if orginally heard by district judge (&other way round)
high court - kings bench
civil court
- over £100,000
- more complicated laws
- hear case stated appeals and application reviews
high court - chancery division
civil court
- buisness, property, land & partnerships
- claims and disputes over trust
high court - family
civil court
- heard privately - sensitive
- child marrage, abduction, forced marriage
- if happens outside of country they will still hear it
appeal route from high court to court of appeal
civil courts
- national important
- sufficent importance (leapfrog)
court of appeal
civil court
- leal grounds
- rare for new evidence to be heard
- has to be made within 21 days
- can change or agree with decision
appeal route from court of appeal to supreme court
- only goes if permission is granted
- national importance
supreme court
civil court
- only if genreal public are involved or new law
- 12 judges in whole court
3 track sytem - small claims
civil court
- under £10,000
- under £1000 in injury
- max 2-3hrs
- no lawyers
- informal
- county court
3 track system - fast track
civil court
- £10,000-£25,000
- £50,000 in injury
- 30 days
- open court for 1 day
- county court
3 track system - multi track
civil court
- £25,000-£50,000
- no time limit
- formal
- over £50,000 in injury
- judge sets timetable ect
pre court procedures
civil court
- alternative dispute resolution- way to solve dispute without court
- pre action protocols- prepare documents ect that the court expect
- which court to use- dpends on the claim
- issuing a claim- N1 form , a fee to pay for claim
- defending claim- dispute claim or amit liability
- track allocation- go to one of the three tracks
employment tribunals
civil court
- prelimary matters-claim must be made within 3 months - contract arbitration service - see if there is a resolution - claim passed to employer
- the hearing- held in indiviudual rooms - hear evidence in full or partial - might decide on day or in writing
- appeal- 42 days to appeal, court of appeal or supreme court
ADR - negotiation
civil court
- two parties talk prior to the court
- no third party
- two s
- solicters can do it whilst in court
+ quick & cheap
- unlikely to reach an agreement
ADR - mediation
civil court
- talk about dispute to an indepent 3rd party
- doesnt give opinions
- used lots in family law
ADR - conciliation
civil court
- talk about dispute to 3rd party but 3rd party can give sugestion on how to solve
- parties are together so may cause trauma and damadge relationships
arbitration
civil court
-
arbitration act 1996 (section 1)
* obtain fair resoltion of dispute without delay
* parties decide who they work with
* if they cant decide the court appoints it themselve (section 18) - arbitration by contract - scott v avery clause - cant sue until you have done arbitration
- arbitration act 1996 (section 9)- court can order a stay if you dont follow arbitration rules
evaluations of ADR
civil court
-
advantages
* less hostile
* parties have more control
* cheaper and more flexable
* experts in area -
disadvantages
* not legally binding (dont have to follow)
* emotionally stressful
* unproductive
* no appeal route
evaluations of civil courts
civil court
-
advantages
* productive
* in public interest
* impartial judge
* good appeal route -
disadvantages
* hostile
* lenghty complex rules
* slow - could get worst
* judge is not specialised
advantages of arbitration
civil court
- parties can choose arbitrater - section 1 - gain confidence and takes away bias - process is easier
- private - public image is kept - big buisness can still carry on and not loose profit
- award enforced through court - legally binding
- reduce court workload - more thorrow procedings as they have the time
disadvanatages of arbitration
civil court
- no legal aid- those who cant afford wont get the same justice
- may be forced into it due to contract- more stress on those who dont want to go into it
- no appeal route- if not fair then you cant appeal - waste of money
- not always in publics best intrest- if involes public they wont find infomation out and can become restless
summary offence
criminal court
- magitrates court
- vandilsm, battery, assult, speeding