The Judicial Power Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Source

A

Article 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Justicability

A

Whether a lawsuit can be decided by a federal court as an actual case or controversy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 components/questions of justicability

A

1) What does a lawsuit request?
—–No advisory opinions

2) When is a lawsuit brought?
—-when its ripe, but before its moot

3) Who brings the lawsuit
—-must be someone with standing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Advisory opinions

A

Lacks actual dispute between adverse parties OR legally binding effect

Courts cant rule on them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ripeness

A

Pre-enforcment review of laws or policies are generally not enforcable.

EXCEPTION: P shows:
1) the issues are fit for a judicial decision AND
2) the P would suffer substantial hardship in the absence of review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mootness

A

Live controversy + ongoing injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mootness excpetions

A

1) Controversies capable of repetition but that evade review b/c of their inherently short duration

2) Cases where teh D voluntarily stops the offending practice but is free to resume it
—–exception: very difficult to restart

3) Class actions in which the class rep’s controversy has beome moot but the claim of at least one member is still viable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Standing components

A

Injury
Causation
Redressability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Injury

A

1) Any concrete or particularized harm
2) that has occured or is imminent
3) that has been suffered by the right person (generally no third party standing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ideological objections and generalized grievances (injury)

A

No standing generally for citiznes and taxpayers.

Ex: —-can’t sue government for not enforcing law
—–can’t challenge congressional spending of tax revenues

EXCEPTIONS:
-tax payers can challenge their tax liability, even as a class.

-congrseional spending in violation of the Establishment Clause
—–applies only to LEGISLATIVE spending (such as congress allocating money to build a church)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Third party standing exceptions

A

FIRST EXCEPTION: If claimant has standing, can assert rights of T IF:
1) difficult for T to assert own rights OR
2) Close relationship between P and T so P could adequatley represent

Example:
–parent suing on behalf of child
–NAACP challenges law demanding release of it’s membership list on behalf of its members (freedom of association)

SECOND EXCEPTION: Organizations can sue on behalf of its members if:
1) there is an injury in fact to the members,
2) the members injury is related to the organizations purpose AND
3) individual member participation in the lawsuit is not required (damages vary by members)

THIRD EXCEPTION: Free Speech Overbreadth
–A person has standing to bring a FS claim alleging that hte gov restricted substantially more speech than necessary even if that persons own speech would not be protected under the First Amendment
——does not apply to commercial speech restrictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Causation (standing)

A

Injury is fairly traceable to the D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Redressability

A

The win CAN remedy their injury through either damages or injunction

Example of no redressability: mother challenged a state’s failure to prosecute a baby daddy for non payment of child support. “remedy” would’ve been just sending dad to jail. Should have sued the dad directly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Soverign Immunity

A

Generally, can’t sue states. Source: 11 amendment.

Exceptions:
1) Waiver
2) Actions against local governments
3) Suits by other states or teh federal government
4) bankruptcy
5) certain actions against state officers
6) congress removes the immunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Soverign immunity waiver

A

Can be express or structural/implied

Structural examples:
1) Vets can sue statesthat refuse to accomodate their service related disabilities
—-based on fed govs power to raise and support a military

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Soveirgn Immunity Exception: local governments

A

Can sue lcoal government AND agencies (like police dept)

17
Q

Soverign immunity: bankruptcy

A

Exception. If ap person ownes a state money, can sue them in relation to a bankruptcy proceeding.

18
Q

Soverign Immunity exception: Certain actions against state officials

A

Can sue:
1) for damages personally OR
2) to enjoin the official from future conduct that violates the Constitution or federal law

But can’t sue seeking retroactive damages.

19
Q

Soverign Immunity Exception: Congress removes immunity

A

Congress can remove as to actions created under the 14th Amendment power to prevent discrimination.

Intent must be clear.

20
Q

Supreme Court Jurisdiction: independent and adequate state law grounds

A

No review of state court decision if adequate and independent state grounds (independent/adequate from federal question)

21
Q

Congress’s power to modify the SUpreme Court’s original and appellate jurisdiction.

A

Congress cannot add to SC’s OJ.

But can make exceptions and regulations re: it’s appellate jurisdiction