The Influence Of Early Attachment On Adult Relationships Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What did Bowlby argue (his monotropic theory)

A

That infants will have one special emotional bond (monotropy) usually with the biological mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the importance of monotropy

A

That the infant uses this relationship to form a mental view of relationships called an internal working model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the continuity hypothesis propose?

A

that individuals who are securely attached in infancy continue to be socially and emotionally competent. This is because a secure childhood leads to a positive internal working model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Secure relationships in childhood ensure a positive working model meaninh current, future and romantic relationships will be…

A

Positive & secure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluation of Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory

A
  • Schaffer & Emerson
  • socially insensitive
  • Tizard & Hodges
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Hazan & Shaver (1987) design a test to study the connection between

A

a person’s infant attachment style, their internal working model, and their adult attachment style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hazan & Shaver (1987) Procedure

A
  • they placed a ‘Love Quiz’ in the Rocky Mountain News (an American small-town newspaper).
  • the quiz asked questions about
    1. relations with parents (to identify infant attachment style)
    2. current relationship experiences (to determine adult attachment style)
    3. attitudes toward love (to assess their internal working model)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How many responses did Hazan & Shaver get?

A

620:
- 205 from men
- 415 from women
(From a fair cross-section of the population)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hazan & Shaver (1987) infant vs adult attachment style findings

A

When analysing adult attachment style they found that the prevalence of adult attachment styles was similar to infant attachment styles. 56% were classified secure, 25% insecure-avoidant and 19% insecure-resistant. This suggests that most people’s infant attachment styles are the same as their adult attachment style.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hazan & Shaver (1987) findings; relationship between adult attachment style & internal working model

A

adults with a positive internal working model tended to be securely attached adults.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hazan & Shaver (1987) findings - correlation between adult attachment style & love experiences

A

positive correlation between adult attachment style and love experiences -> Securely attached adults = happy, friendly + trusting love experiences; emphasised being able to accept and support their partner despite faults.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How long did ‘secure’ attachment relationships last

A

10 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How long did ‘avoidant’ attached relationships last

A

6 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How long did ‘resistant’ attached relationships last

A

5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hazan + Shaver (-) how unreliable it is
E.g Fraley (2002)

A
  • several other studies have failed to find the strong correlation between infant attachment style and adult attachment style.

Fraley (2002) conducted a review of 27 samples where infants were assessed in infancy and later reassessed (ranging from one month to 20 years later). He found correlations ranging from .5 to as low as .1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

(-) Hazan and Shaver; we can’t determine cause and effect

A

This is as the study is correlational, rather than experimental
-> impossible to say infant attachment styles determine adult ones
-> could be a third variable that affects both e.g. a person’s innate temperament

17
Q

(-) Hazan and Shaver overt reliance on pp’s memories

A
  • This study relies on participants’ memories about their early lives in order to assess their infant attachment style.
    -> Such recollections are likely to be flawed because our memories of the past are not always accurate, making the study not valid.
18
Q

(+) some other research evidence to support Hazan & Shaver e.g. Mcarthy (1999) - study on 40 adult women

A

Mcarthy’s (1999) study supports the evidence for the influence of early attachments on future relationships. He conducted a study with 40 women of adult age who shared information about their childhood, which helped determine their early attachment styles in the study.

Women with secure attachments in childhood rated their romantic relationships more positively than women with insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant attachment styles.