THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE Flashcards
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Ott, Steven J. (1990) Understanding of Organizational Culture
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Ott, Steven J. (1990) Understanding of Organizational Culture
*Understanding that there is an informal organization that exists as a subcomponent of formal organizations. There are two primary schools of thought when thinking about organizations: 1) Mainline perspective approach and 2) Organizational culture approach.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Ott, Steven J. (1990) Understanding of Organizational Culture
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Ott, Steven J. (1990) Understanding of Organizational Culture
Organizational culture theories are predicated only on assumptions and this deviates from the mainline perspectives (organizations as closed systems) which stipulates that quantitative, experimental-type, logical positivist, scientific research is useful for studying organizations. The mainline perspective also posits that organizations are institutions whose primary purpose is to accomplish goals that are set forth by people in authority. In the mainline perspective, organizational theories are concerned with how to best design organizational structures and manage to attain goals effectively and efficiently. The personal preferences of organizational members are restrained by formal rules, authority, and rational behavior.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Ott, Steven J. (1990) Understanding of Organizational Culture
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Ott, Steven J. (1990) Understanding of Organizational Culture
Organizational culture theories are predicated only on assumptions. Organizational culture is an unobservable force behind organizational activities and is comprised of such things as shared values, beliefs, assumptions, perceptions, norms, and patterns of behavior. Culture to an organization is like personality to a person. Organizational culture refers to a set of theories that attempt to explain and predict how organizations and its people act in them. Organizational culture approach assumes that organizational behaviors are predetermined by patterns of basic assumptions existing in the organization. [SIDE NOTE-Closed loop approach]. A pervasive organizational culture will become the norm and the accepted truth about how things are done within the organization. A strong culture controls organizational behavior and can block the organizational from making changes needed to adapt to the environment. Personal preferences of behavior and not controlled by formal rules and authority but are instead guided by norms, beliefs, and assumptions.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Ott, Steven J. (1990) Understanding of Organizational Culture
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Ott, Steven J. (1990) Understanding of Organizational Culture
The organizational culture perspective is beneficial for describing and explaining, and to some extent predicting behavior when organizations are facing fundamental changes. Organizational culture is still a very nebulous concept (at the time this article was written) and its utilization presents more questions than answers.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Morgan, Gareth. (2006). Chapter 5: Creating Social Reality: Organizations as Cultures
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Morgan, Gareth. (2006). Chapter 5: Creating Social Reality: Organizations as Cultures
I Culture refers to a pattern of development reflected in a society’s system of knowledge, ideology, values, laws, and daily rituals. Organizations are mini-societies that have their own mini-societies and subcultures. Corporate culture “develops an ethos (spirit of a culture or era) that is sustained by social processes, images, symbols, and rituals that are embedded in the formal structure of an organization.” (Page 128). An organization’s fundamental nature depends as much on its culture as on the formal organizational chart, codes, and procedures. Organizational leaders play a crucial role in shaping the values that direct/guide an organization.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Morgan, Gareth. (2006). Chapter 5: Creating Social Reality: Organizations as Cultures
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Morgan, Gareth. (2006). Chapter 5: Creating Social Reality: Organizations as Cultures
Leaders are symbolic of many aspects of their organizations. Leaders, through their position of power, have an advantage in that they can dictate corporate values and codes of behavior. Changing organizational culture is a daunting task that involves the reinventing of values, shared meanings, beliefs, ways of thinking, and bringing about a new way of life. Changing organizational culture means introducing a new shared meaning that must be accepted by the majority. The difficult task in cultural change is doing away with the societal values and norms that are imported into the organization.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Morgan, Gareth. (2006). Chapter 5: Creating Social Reality: Organizations as Cultures
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Morgan, Gareth. (2006). Chapter 5: Creating Social Reality: Organizations as Cultures
Corporate culture is not imposed on a social setting. Instead, it emerges from social interaction. Different groups within the organization (accounting, production, sales, marketing, etc) may have differing view of the organization’s business. Groups may have their own languages and sets of favored concepts. These differing norms and functions of groups can combine to produce inefficiencies and contradictions. Subcultural divisions can also emerge when different groups have different loyalties. Individuals may develop subcultures within the organization that have certain practices, values, and norms that are in opposition to organization values. This results in a struggle (between organization and groups) to shape culture and claim control.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Schein.(1993)
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Schein.(1993). Defining Organizational Culture
Organizational culture has come to be symbolized by the espoused values, artifacts, and underlying assumptions. The concept of culture helps to explain some of the more seemingly irrational aspects of groups and organizations. [SIDE NOTE-In other words those relationships and interactions that are not outlined on the organizational chart]. Commonly used definitions of culture emphasize critical aspects such as group norms, espoused values, rules of the game, embedded skills, habits of thinking, shared meanings, artifacts, underlying assumptions etc. All of these critical aspects denote something that group members have in common. Culture also denotes that something that is inherent to the group is stable.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Schein.(1993)
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Schein.(1993)
Leadership is tasked with the role of having to create and manage the culture of organizations. “The only thing of important leaders to is change and manage culture” (Schein, 1985). Thus, leadership and cultures are intertwined. Schein (1993, Page 361) proposes that leaders “create and manage culture” and “managers and administrators live within them.” However, culture is only partly created by leadership, as organizational groups also have influence in forming cultures.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Schein.(1993)
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Schein.(1993)
**If culture becomes dysfunctional it is the job of leadership to perceive the functional and dysfunctional elements of the existing culture and to manage cultural evolution and change in such a way that the group can survive in a changing environment. It is imperative that leaders become conscious of the cultures in which they are embedded or those cultures will manage them. Cultural understanding is essential for leaders if they are to lead.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Cook and Yannow. (1993). Culture and Organizational Learning
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Cook and Yannow. (1993). Culture and Organizational Learning
*Organizational learning takes place at the group level and not at the individual level. Organization learning can be one way that culture is changed.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Cook and Yannow. (1993). Culture and Organizational Learning
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Cook and Yannow. (1993). Culture and Organizational Learning
Cook and Yannow suggest that organizations are capable of learning. Yet organizational learning does not imply observable change. For instance, an organization can learn something in order not to change. Lastly, all organization know-how is unique to each organization and no two organizations perform the same task identically. Lastly, organizational learning is not like individual learning because organizations do not possess the cognitive wherewithal of individuals (which is very complex). Organizational culture is defined “as a set of clause, beliefs, and feelings, together with the artifacts of their expression transmission, that are created inherited, shared, and transmitted within one group of people and that, in part, distinguish the group from others.” (Page 372). Organizational culture is formed by individuals acting in groups over time to create a set of meanings that are expressed in artifacts. Therefore organizational learning is associated with a category of activity that can only be done by a group. When a group acquires the know-how associated with its ability to carry out its collective activities, organizational learning has taken place.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Cook and Yannow. (1993). Culture and Organizational Learning
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Cook and Yannow. (1993). Culture and Organizational Learning
Learning is related to knowing something and entails acquiring knowledge. Organizational learning denotes an activity that is done by a group and that holistic organizational functions cannot be carried out by one individual. Thus, organizational learning is reflective of group learning or acquiring knowledge.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Cook and Yannow. (1993). Culture and Organizational Learning
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Cook and Yannow. (1993). Culture and Organizational Learning
It becomes important for new members to absorb and conform to the culture of the organization. Organizations are therefore able to continually reconstitute themselves and ensure that their cultural practices and beliefs are sustained. Individuals become socialized into the cultural fabric of the organization therefore reconstituting the culture of the organization i.e. preserving the current culture. It is important for organizations to know how to make the actions of a new individual compatible with the other members of the organization thereby fostering the continuity of its culture.
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Trice and Beyer. (1993). Changing Organizational Cultures
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE
Trice and Beyer. (1993). Changing Organizational Cultures
Managers who want to change existing cultures need to find ways to incorporate new elements into prevalent ideologies and cultural norms. Changing or creating cultures requires replacing existing ideologies, symbols, and customs with new ones. Culture change involves breaking with the past and breaking with current cultural continuity. Cultural change is not an easy process. It is a difficult, complicated, and demanding effort that may not succeed.