The Hitler State Flashcards

1
Q

What Are the Strengths of Hitler’s Dictatorship?

A
  1. Gift of propaganda + public speaking - Mein Kampf refers to propaganda - way of maintaining popular support + controlling opposition
  2. Hitler’s magnetic personality - influenced people + convinced them that he was special
  3. Effective dictator - strong will = power/energy/determination - vision for Germany = working towards Fuhrer
  4. Belief in own genius to achieve his aims + ability to convince others of genius (even in dark times)
  5. Established a strong dictatorship without too much opposition
  6. Engendered loyalty from party - party dependent on Hitler - leading members remained loyal until bitter end (Fuhrerprinzip)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the Weaknesses of Hitler’s Dictatorship?

A
  1. Neurotic - anxious + emotionally upset
  2. Horrified by prospect of own death - became dependent on drugs
  3. Did not like making decisions - believed things would work themselves out
  4. Found it difficult to keep set routine - had huge implications for those who worked with him
  5. Easily board + quite lazy
  6. Strange working hours
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Totalitarian State?

A
  • Every aspect of life controlled by one person/party

- Dictatorship is in total control of all aspects of the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Was Nazi Germany a Totalitarian State?

A
  • Highly unlikely that it was a Totalitarian State in the true sense - Hitler did not have total control + not the monolithic
  • Hitler’s State was a Polycratic State - consisted of a number of powerful agencies/individuals with overlapping interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Polycratic

A
  • An alliance of different power blocks not in union but which are dependent on each other + work with each other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Process of Radicalisation

Consolidation of Power 1933-1934

A
  • Establishment of dictatorship + one party State
  • Removal of political opposition
  • Removal of internal threats
  • Consensus with key groups (e.g. churches/army/businesses)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Process of Radicalisation

Authoritarian Regime 1934-1937

A
  • Not barbaric dictatorship- viewed as conservative dictatorship which has removed radical left wingers (e.g. KPD+SPD)
  • Restoration of national pride/honour through rearmament- examples = occupation of Rhineland/economic polices/Berlin Olympics 1936
  • Repression of opposition inside/outside Germany - viewed as reasonable - Communities need to be crushed
  • Conservative elements from Weimar (e.g. Schacht+Bloomberg) in prominent positions
  • Nuremberg Laws (1935) moderate steps against Jews
  • SA leader seen to be out of control - Hitler correct in countering threat posed by Rohm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Process of Radicalisation

Radicalisation + Destruction 1938-1945

A
  • Structures established earlier in regime started to expand considerably -
    1. Goering’s Four Year Plan (1936) dominated economy - resulted in resignation of Schacht (1937)
    2. SS under Himmler controlled all internal security + had own military wing (Waffen SS) - SS responsible for implementing Hitler’s racial polices
    3. Purge of army officers in 1938 removed corps (e.g. Bloomberg) + replaced with like-minded officers (more aggressive) - little opposition from army 1938-1944
    4. 1939 = all key agencies working towards Fuhrer
  • Aggressive foreign policy threatens peace in Europe - occupation of Austria/Sudetenland/Czech/Poland
  • Declaring war on USA (1941) seen as open attack on Jews of the world
  • Radicalisation of racial polices (Kristallnacht/Euthanasia/Racial war in east/Final Solution
  • Orders given in 1945 to destroy all economic resources left in Germany in a final act of total annihilation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Compare Hitler’s Dictatorship in 1934-1937 to his Dictatorship in 1938-1945

A

1934-1937

  • Respectable
  • Moderate
  • Revising treaty of Versailles
  • SA seen as threat
  • Restoring pride
  • Removal of communism - justified
  • Bloomberg + Schacht

1937-1945

  • More aggressive in general
  • Goering’s Four Year Plan - controlled economy
  • Got rid of respectable/conservative members (e.g. Bloomberg)
  • SS = more power
  • Aggressive foreign policy (e.g. anschlus)
  • Aggressive racial elements (e.g. Kristallnacht)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe Hitler’s Authority

A
  • Power was not challenged
  • Power was not constrained (no limits)
  • Power was absolute - he alone could interpret the will of the people + interpretation became law
  • Hitler was true source of power - kept regime together - loyalty to Hitler was most important thing
  • During war years Hitler became even more remote - lost some power? - Bormann became increasingly influential - Himmler + Goering arrangement with Western Allies - Abandoned idea of working towards Fuhrer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Briefly Describe the Relationship between Party + State?

A
  • Appeared well-organised
  • Relationship between structure + role of Nazi party and the apparatus of the German state was never clarified satisfactorily
  • Army independent but slowly becoming under Hitler’s control (oath)
  • Party + State became united
  • Violence/fear/Nazism
    Good for Hitler —- Divide + Rule
    /
    /
    Led to Confusion
    \
    \
    Bad for State —- 1936 = controlled by Nazi
    (Army/Police/etc)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What Was the Relationship Between Party + State in 1933/34?

A
  • 1933 = Separate entities
  • 1934 = Hitler claimed the party was to control state
  • Gradual Process - easy because many Germans were committed to working for the Fuhrer
  • Even stubborn/reluctant people found something to work towards (e.g. reversing Versailles) - better chance of maintaining status/job?
  • Party wasn’t unified - made up of many smaller groups (e.g. SS/SA/HS/DAF/BDM/Gestapo)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did Nazi Party Change from 1932-1939?

A
  • Party membership 1932 = 850000
  • Party Membership 1939 = 8 million
  • Most important members joined before 1930
  • Rush to join after March 1933 (people known as March Violets
  • Nazi elites tended to be drawn from lower middle classes/rural areas - industrial/urban working class = underrepresented
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What Effect Did the Nazi Party Have at a Local Level?

Who were the Gauleiters?

A
  • Significant Impact
  • “ever-present and intrusive …. became ingrained into the fabric of day to day life” - {Collier}
  • Abolition of the states allowed Nazis to appoint 32 Gauleiters to govern the regions
  • Gauleiters were virtually all powerful + resisted interference from outside bodies - had personal accesses to Hitler + were totally loyal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the Gaus

A
  • Every Gau divided into 760 Kreise (districts)
  • Headed by a Kreisleiter
  • Block wardens appointed to keep close eye on people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who did the Party Attempt to Positively Affect People’s Lives (1933/34)?

A
  • This was a kind of paternalism
  • Strength Through Joy = entertainment for workers (e.g. theatre trips/sporting events/holidays) - Organised by DAF
  • Beauty of Labour = Improving working conditions (e.g. improved ventilation/heating/potted plants)
  • Winterhelp = collections for the homless
17
Q

What was the Party’s Relationship with the Civil Service?

A

1934-1937
- Civil Service was keen for Nazi Government - opposed Weimar
- Lots of co-operation
- Did not object purge of Jews/Socialists (restoring order)
1937-1945
- As the regime became more radical CS became increasingly concerned
- Top CS were increasingly monitored by Nazis (e.g. phones tapped)
- Felt that they losing their independence
- Collapse of cabinet government led to chaos + confusion - made it difficult for CS to operate
- Remained loyal to regime + participated directly in crimes being committed by Nazis (e.g. attending Wannsee Conference)

18
Q

What was the Relationship Between Party + Legal System?

A
  • Judges + Lawyers naturally conservative + disliked Weimar/feared communism
  • Did not protest/object to being coordinated into Nazi Lawyers Association in 1933
  • Law passed in wake of Reichstag Fire dominated legal proceedings + allowed Nazis to by-pass courts/leagl system.
19
Q

Why was the Support of the Army So Important to Hitler?

A
  • Vital for Political stability
  • A regime which fails to maintain the support of the armed forces will lack credibility domestically/internationally
  • Traditional + Respectable (used in Potsdam Day)
20
Q

What was the Relationship Between the State + the Army 1934-1937?

A
  • Cordial
  • Oath to Hitler
  • Night of Long Knifes
  • Rearmed - modernised + conscription
  • New air force (Luftwafte)
  • Conquered foreign lands (e.g. Rhineland)
  • Same ideology
21
Q

How Did the Relationship Between State + Army Change in 1937?

A
  • Purge of Moderate Army Officers
  • 11/37 = Hitler outlined new foreign policy -WAR
  • Bloomberg (War Minister) + Fritsch didn’t agree
  • Bloomberg resigned in 1938 (wife was a prostitute) + Fritsch resigned (accused of homosexuality)
  • Hitler took control of the army
  • “free reign to wage war; the armed forces were docile + obedient” {Collier}
22
Q

What was the Relationship Between State + Army in 1938-1945?

A
  • 1938 Onwards = army’s ability to shape political developments was drastically reduced - Hitler was strong enough to mould the army more closely to his requirements (army tamed to new master)
  • Plan to arrest Hitler 1938 by disillusioned generals in event of war = proof of deterioration in their relationship
    1938-1942
  • Military policy = successful - plan/arrest didn’t work
  • Resistance = treason/unpatriotic
    1943-1945
  • Defeat in Stalingrad/North Africa = more opposition of army
  • Involvement of army leaders in July Bomb Plot marked end powerful/position of army in society (Gestapo arrested/executed these officers)
  • Last traces of army independence subsumed within regime
23
Q

Describe the Relationship Between State + Big Businesses

A

1933 - 1936
- position on BB began to improve (world economy + destruction of trade unions)
- Small businesses being squeezed out
- Building/coal/steel industries = prospered
- Consumer goods = Suffered
- BB maintained independence
1936 - 1939
- Four Year Plan = turning point
- Only influential group left was electro-chemical sector (crucial role in rearmament)
- Schacht’s authority no longer existed (valued consumer goods)
- BB accepted primacy of politics/fearful of resistance to state intervention only make situation worse.
1939-1945
- BB worker with regime until the end
- Party controlled+directed everything - fatally compromised War production in early years
- BB likened to conductor on buses - no control over actions of driver but keeps collecting passengers’ fares until final crash