The globalisation of World politics (textbook) - chapter 7 Liberalism Flashcards
What are the three progressions of liberal thinking/internationalism?
The first dates back to the enlightenment in which the concepts of liberalist thought and the way of describing relations between nations began. Here it was believed that war could be solved through the development of a body of international rules and laws constraining the self-interest of states.
This then progressed past the first World War in which the League of Nations was created in reaction to the war. This was done to solve disputes between countries and managing each countries colonies.
The third wave takes us to present day. This is seen with the rise of non-western countries such as China, Indonesia, Brazil and Russia. Can other states and institutions take up the mantle of leadership following the US decline in recent times. Do other countries see this responsibility as relevant to world order.
What is at the core of Kant and Bentham’s ideas?
The belief that reason could deliver freedom and justice in international relations.
What did Bentham put forward as his utilitarian maxim?
The greatest happiness of the greatest number. This was thus the task for a judge for a legislator for the family of nations.
What did Kant require as necessary for perpetual peace?
The transformation on individual consciousness, republican constitutionalism and a federal contract among states to abolish war - like a permanent peace treaty.
What is liberal internationalism?
The supporting of international institutions, open markets, cooperative security and liberal democracy.
What is the theory of democratic peace?
A central plank of liberal internationalist thought, the democratic peace thesis makes two claims: first, that liberal polities exhibit restraint in their relations with other liberal polities (the so-called separate peace), and second, that they are imprudent in relations with authoritarian states. The validity of the democratic peace thesis has been fiercely debated in the IR literature.
What are the limitations of of the democratic peace?
It is not aware as to why democratic institutions are less likely to engage with conflict. Possible explanations include that it is because the decision is made by the people through the electorate and that democratic countries are wealthier meaning they have less to gain and more to lose. The most convincing explanation is that of amity between liberal nations.
How did did the failure of interdependence between Britain and Germany (economic) before the first World War shift liberal thinking?
It shifted the thinking of peace from a natural condition to one that must be constructed and maintained. This was further supported by Woodrow Wilson with the advocacy of an international authority. This was supported with mechanisms that addressed disputes and dealt with them appropriately if a non-violent solution could not bear fruits.
What were some of the key mechanisms of the League of Nations?
Collective security in which an attack on one nation concerns all nations, ceasing relations with offending states, imposing sanctions on these states and self-determination.
What is self-determination?
A principle ardently, but selectively, espoused by US President Woodrow Wilson in the peace negotiations that followed the First World War: namely that each ‘people’ should enjoy self-government over its own sovereign nation-state. Wilson pressed for application of this principle to East/Central Europe, but did not believe that other nationalities (in colonized Asia, Africa, the Pacific, and the Caribbean) were fit for self-rule.
What issues arose out of self-determination?
Contradictory support for different nations i.e. not applying self-determination equally to all nations.
Why did the League of Nations collapse?
The fact that the US and the Soviet Union failed to join undermined its validity significantly. This was followed by the Manchurian crisis and the Ethiopian crisis in the 30s. It was killed off by Hitler’s decision to take back the Rhineland.
How could some of the thinking in the inter-war period be looked at as Conservative?
This stems from the opposition to the idea of the League having coercive authority and this should only be reserved for sovereign states, as a change in the structure of the system rises non-western powers taking control. This was a radically imperialist point of view that was hospitable to empire and inhospitable to big alterations of democracy and to the subordination of states to the rule of law.
What changes did the UN implement and add to the League of Nations after 1945?
One of the biggest changes was the power of veto - this was the acknowledgement of the need for consensus among great powers for the enforcement of action. This means any of the great powers could veto any coercive action proposed by the others.
What is the ‘indispensable nation’?
The US.