The Extent To Which 'Big Government' Was Reduced, 1981-1996 Flashcards
New Federalism
The policy of turning over the control of some federal programs to state and local governments
How did Reagan see reducing ‘big government’ as benefitting the USA?
New Federalism would produce less federal interference in state and local affairs, business, finance and all aspects of people’s lives
How was reducing ‘big government’ seen as something negative? (5)
- Less funding for state and local government projects
- Less regulation of business expansionism
- Greedy
- Less control over foreign imports
- Less social welfare for the most needy
How many pages were removed from the Federal Register?
23,000 pages
How many pages did the Federal Register have in 1960 and when Reagan came into power?
1960 - 14,500
1981 - 87,000
What did Reagan state the administration had achieved against ‘big government’? (4)
- Cut federal regulations almost in half
- Helped to bring down the cost of petrol and heating fuel by deregulation
- Created a federal strike force to combat government fraud and waste
- Replaced federal agencies with private sector ones and federal employees with volunteers
How much money did Reagan save by creating a federal strike force to combat government fraud?
$2 billion in six months
Big vs small companies during deregulation:
Whilst big companies expanded, smaller independent companies struggled.
What happened to the smaller companies that struggled during the 1980s?
Big companies bought them out leading to a rise in the number of conglomerates
Conglomerates:
An organisation that controls several businesses of different types
Big businesses during deregulation: (4)
- Bought out smaller companies
- Businesses set their own standards of safety (physical and financial)
- ‘Fixed’ a price structure, so that they did not have to compete
- Cut services provided to maximise profits
What occurred when banking restrictions were lifted?
Banks could offer high interest rates on savings
How were high interest rates good and bad for people?
- Good for savers
- Bad for struggling businesses and people with long-term loans
What did banks and S&Ls compete for?
Custom
How was banks and S&Ls competing beneficial for some?
Those who had savings, and who were able to understand the various offers benefited the most.
Before deregulation, how did S&Ls run? (2)
- Run by people used to making safe investments
- Mostly provided mortgage loans at a regulated rate of interest
How did S&Ls operate after they started to compete with banks? (4)
- Made increasingly risky investments
- Lend at very low rates
- Offered high rates of savings to savers
- Many failed through incompetence