The Essential Elements of Crimes Flashcards
What is the rule regarding the act requirement? Define an act.
Rule: Ordinarily, if you don’t have an act, you don’t have a crime.
Definition: An act is a voluntary bodily movement
What is the omissions rule? What are the three requirements?
In some limited situation, a failure to act can be the basis for criminal liability.
Three Requirements:
(1) legal duty to act
(2) Knowledge of the facts giving rise to the duty, AND
(3) The ability to help
For purposes of the omissions rule, what are the five ways a legal duty to act can be created?
A legal duty to act can be created by:
(a) statute
(b) contract or agreement
(c) status relations (e.g. parent-child; spouse-to-spouse)
(d) voluntary assumption of care
(e) creation of a peril
What are the four common law mental states?
(1) Specific Intent
(2) Malice
(3) General Intent
(4) Strict Liability
Define Specific Intent…
When the crime requires not just the desire to do the act, but also the desire to achieve a specific result.
Summary: Intent to act with intent to cause certain result
What are the 11 Specific Intent Crimes?
- Assault
- First-degree premeditated murder
- Larceny
- Embezzlement
- False Pretenses
- Robbery
- Forgery
- Burglary
- Solicitation
- Conspiracy
- Attempt
Note: More defense apply to specific intent crimes than the other– especially evidence of mistake of fact and voluntary intoxication.
Define Malice…
When a defendant acts intentionally or with reckless disregard of an obvious or known risk.
What are the common law malice crimes?
(1) Murder
and
(2) Arson
Define General Intent…
The defendant need only be generally aware of the factors constituting the crime; he need not intend a specific result.
Note: The jury can usually infer the general intent simply from the doing of the act.
What are examples of general intent crimes?
(A) Battery
(B) False Imprisonment
(C) Kidnapping
(D) Forcible Rape
(All are crimes against the person)
Define Strict Liability…
Crime requires simply doing the act; no mental state needed.
What are the two types of strict liability crimes?
(1) Public welfare offenses - regulatory or morality offenses that typically carry small penalties. (e.g. selling alcohol to a minor)
(2) Statutory Rape - having sex with someone who is under the age of consent.
What is the rule regarding mistake of fact? What is the requirement for general intent crimes? specific intent crimes? strict liability?
Rule: Whether a defendant’s mistake of fact will be a “defense” depends upon the mental state for the crime and whether the mistake is reasonable or unreasonable. So, if the mental state is -
- Specific intent, then any mistake (even an unreasonable one) will be a defense; mistake need only be honest
- General intent, then ONLY a reasonable mistake will be a defense; mistake must be honest and reasonable.
- Strict liability, then mistake is NEVER a defense.
Summary: a reasonable mistake will be a defense to any crime, except a crime of strict liability. An unreasonable mistake will be a defense ONLY to specific intent crimes.
What is the rule regarding mistake of law? exceptions?
Rule: Mistake of law is NOT a defense.
Exceptions:
a) If the statute specifically makes knowledge of the law an element of the crime (e.g. “selling a gun to a known felon”)
b) The statute was not available (very limited and unlikely
c) The defendant reasonably relied on a statute or judicial decision that was overruled or declared unconstitutional
d) the defendant relied on official interpretation or advise from someone charged with enforcement, administration, or interpretation of the law. BUT… erroneous advise from a private attorney is not a defense to prosecution.
What are the levels of culpability under the Model Penal Code? Define each.
Intentionally (or purposely) - When it is the defendant’s conscious object to accomplish a particular result; It is what the defendant meant to do.
Knowingly - when the defendant is aware of what he is doing (willfully)
Recklessly - when the defendant is aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk, and consciously disregards that risk.
Negligently - when the defendant should have known about a substantial and unjustifiable risk.