The CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Flashcards
How does CLARKE Describe SITUATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION
a PRE EMPTIVE APPROACH that RELIES NOT on Improving Society BUT Simply to REDUCE OPPORTUNITIES For CRIME
State and Explain an Example of an SCP Measure
TARGET HARDENING Measures such as LOCKING DOORS and WINDOW INCREASE the EFFORT a BURGLAR NEEDS to Make, while INCREASED SURVEILLANCE in SHOPS via CCTV or SECUIRTY Guards INCREASE the LIKLIHOOD of Shop Lifting BEING CAUGHT
Explain how link between SCP and Rational Choice Theory
Underlying SCP Apporaches is RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY of Crime - that CRIMINALS ACT RATIONALLY, WEIGH UP the COSTS and BENEFITS Of a CRIME BEFORE DEICIDNG Whether to COMMIT Or Not
ADVANTAGE of SCP
+ is a COST EFFECTIVE and RELATIVELY SIMPLE Method of Curbing Crime and therefore Appealing As a Short Term Solution to Most Common Crime
Explain the DISADVANTAGE of SCP - DISPLACEMENT
- Measures DON’T REDUCE CRIME But Simply DISPLACES - IF CRIMINALS ACT RATIONALLY, they WILL Respond by TARGET HARDENING SIMPLY BY MOVING to WHERE TARGETS are SOFTER
highlights the WEAKNESS that SCP Too HEAVILY FOCUSES on PETTY STREET CRIMES Like BURGLARY and Therefore IGNORE WHITE COLLAR, CORPORATE and STATE CRIMES
Explain ECP and WILSON & KELLING - “BROKEN WINDOW”
- Use the Phrase “BROKEN WINDOW to STAND for ALL the VARIOUS SIGNS of DISORDER and LACK Of CONCERN FOR OTHERS That are FOUND in SOME NEIGHBOURHOODS -> including Graffiti, Vadilism.
- LEAVING the BROKEN WINDOWS UNREPAIRED, TOLERATING AGRRESIVE BEHAVIOUR, SENDS out a SIGNAL That NO ONE CARES -> IN these AREAS there Is an ABSENCE of SOCIAL CONTROL (Police) and INFORMED CONTROL (the Community)
- this is BECAUSE POLICE are MORE CONCERNED With OTHER CRIMES and NOT PETTY ONES, while THE COMMUNITY FEEL INTIMIDATED
ECP - What is WILSON & KELLING’s SOLUTION to UNREPAIRED BROKEN WINDOWS
- ZERO TOLERANCE POLICING - CRACK DOWN on ANY DISORDER
- INSTEAD Of MERELY REACTING To a CRIME, the POLICE MUST PROACTIVELY TACKLE Even the Slightest Sign of DISORDER, Even If it’s Not Criminal
- this would PRESUMABLY would HALT NEIGHBOURHOOD DECLINE and PREVENT SERIOUS CRIMES Taking Root
What is the PROBLEM of ECP Solution - ZERO TOLERANCE POLICING
ZTP Often DISPROPORTIONALLY AFFECTS ETHNIC MINORITIES Due to BIASES of the INSTITUTIONALLY RACIST POLICE Insitiution who PUT INTO PRACTISE Their ‘CANTEEN CULTURE’ By HEAVILY STOP & SEARCH BLACK Ppl Compared to WHITE Ppl
- COULD have EFFECT of ETHNICS NOT being IN FAVOUR of POLICE and Therefore REBEL BY COMMITTING MORE CRIMES
Explain SOCIAL & COMMUNITY CRIME PREVENTION
- STRATEGIES place EMPHASIS Firmly ON the POTENTIAL OFFENDER and Their SOCIAL CONTEXT
- AIM to REMOVE the CONDITIONS That PREDISPOSE INDIVIDUALS To CRIME In the FIRST PLACE
- are LONGER-TERM STRATEGIES as they AIM to TACKLE the ROOT CAUSE Of OFFENDING (e.g. Poverty. Unemployment) RATHER than Simply REMOVING OPPORTUNITIES for Crime
EXPLAIN how the PERRY PRE-SCHOOL PROJECT is an EXAMPLE of a SOCIAL & COMMUNITY CRIME PREVENTION STRATEGY
- was a PROJECT for DISADVANTAGED BLACK CHILDREN
- an EXPERIMENTAL GROUP of 3-4 yr olds was OFFERED a 2 YEAR INTELLECTUAL ENRICHMENT PROGRAM and Received WEEKLY HOME VISITS
- STUDY SHOWED Striking DIFFERENCES WITH Those that HADN’T UNDERGONE the PROGRAM -> by AGE 40 the CHILDREN had SIGNIFICANTLY FEWER LIFETIME ARRESTS For VIOLENT CRIME and DRUGS while Some had Graduated from High School and WERE IN EMPLOYMENT
What are 2 DISADVANTAGES of SOCIAL & COMMUNITY CRIME PREVENTION
- USUALLY the MOST EXPENSIVE of all CRIME PREVENTION STRATEGIES. MAY therefore BE DIFFICULT To IMPLEMENT ON a LARGE SCALE
POWERPOINT SHEET ABOUT PERSPECTIVES ON CRIME AND CONTROL PRVEENTION
.
What is SURVEILLANCE
MONITORING of PUBLIC BEHAVIOUR for the PURPOSES of POPULATION Or CRIME CONTROL
it THEREFORE INVOLVES OBSERVING PEOPLE’S BEHAVIOUR to GATHER DATA ABOUT IT and TYPICALLY, USING the DATA to REGULATE, MANAGE or ‘CORRECT’ Their BEHAVIOUR
How has SURVEILLANCE CHANGED in LATE MODERN SOCIETY
it NOW INVOLVES the USE of SOPHISTICATED TECHNOLOGY, Including CCTV CAMERAS and Databases that Collate Information from Different Sources to Produce Profiles of Groups and Individuals
FOUCAULT: BIRTH of the PRISON - Explain what he Argues with SOVEREIGN and DISCIPLINARY POWER
CONTRASTS BETWEEN 2 DIFFERENT FORMS of PUNISHMENT :
SOVEREIGN POWER : When the MONARCH Had ABSOLUTE POWER OVER PEOPLE and Their Bodies -> CONTROL ASSERTED By INFLICTING DISFIGURING VISIBLE PUNISHMENT On the BODY
DISCIPLINARY POWER : a NEW SYSTEM SEEKS to GOVERN NOT JUST The BODY, but the MIND Or ‘SOUL’
What does FOUCAULT Say about SURVEILLANCE and CONTROL
DISCIPLINARY POWER REPLACED SOVEREIGN POWER Simply because SURVEILLANCE is a MORE EFFICIENT ‘TECHNOLOGY of POWE’, a More Effective Way of Controlling Power
it’s Now DISPERSED THROUGHOUT SOCIETY, PENETRATING EVERY SOCIAL INSTITUTION to REACH Every Individual e.g: Schools and Factories
How does The PANOPTICON ILLUSTRATE DISCIPLINARY POWER
- was a DESIGN for a PRISON for WHICH EACH PRISONER In his OWN CELL is VISIBLE To the GUARDS FROM a Central WATCH TOWER, BUT the GUARDS AREN’T VISIBLE To the PRISONERS
- thus the PRISONERS DON’T KNOW IF They’re BEING WATCHED but they DO KNOW that They MIGHT BE BEING WATCHED
- therefore They HAVE to BEHAVE At ALL TIMES As they WERE WATCHED and the SURVEILLANCE TURNS Into SLEF-SURVEILLANCE and DISCIPLINE BECOMES SELF DISCIPLINE
1 CRITICISM of FOUCALT?
EXAGGERATES the EXTENT of CONTROL -e.g. GOFFMAN (1982) - shows how SOME INMATES of PRISONS and MENTAL HOSPITALS are ABLE to RESIST CONTROLS
What does MATHIESON argue about SYNOPTIC SURVEILLANCE?
- argued FOUCAUT’s VIEW Tells HALF The STROY WHEN APPLIED to TODAY’S SOCIETY.
- BELIEVED WHILE the PANOPTICAL ALLOWS the FEW to MONITOR the MANY , TODAY the MEDIA ALSO ENABLE the MANY to SEE the FEW
- in LATE MODERNITY There’s an INCREASE In the TOP-DOWN, CENTRALISED SURVEILLANCE that FOUCAULT DISCUSSES BUT ALSO In SURVEILLANCE FROM BELOW -> Mathieson calls this ‘SYNOPTICON’ - where EVERYBODY WATCHES EVERYBODY
How does THOMPSON Provide an EXAMPLE of MATHEISON’s ‘SYNOPTICON’
- argues that POWERFUL GROUPS Such as POLITICIANS FEAR the MEDIA’S SURVEILLANCE Of Them May UNCOVER DAMAGING INFO ABOUT THEM, and this ACTS as a FORM of SOCIAL CONTROL OVER Their ACTIVITIES
Explain what FEELEY & SIMON Argue through - ACTUARIAL JUSTICE and RISK MANAGEMENT
- argue that A NEW ‘TECHNOLOGY Of POWER’ is EMERGING THROUGHOUT the JUSTICE SYSTEM. It DIFFERS From FOUCAULT’s Disciplinary Power in 3 Ways :
- it FOCUSES on GROUPS RATHER Than INDIVIDUALS * ISN’T INTERESTED In the REHABILITATING OFFENDERS , but SIMPLY in PREVENTING THEM From OFFENDING * USES ‘ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS - CALCULATES the STATISTICAL RISK Of PARTICULAR EVENTS HAPPENING to PARTICULAR GROUPS
- FEELY & SIMON - Apply this To Surveillance and Crime and Control -> e.g. AIRPORT SECURITY SCREENING -> CHECKS are BASED on KNOWN OFFENDER ‘RISK FACTORS’ -> AIM it to PREIDCT+PREVENT FUTURE OFFENDING
What are the 4 AIMS of PUNISHMENT
- DETERRENCE
- INCAPACITATION
- REHABILITATION
- RETRIBUTION
Explain the AIM of PUNISHMENT - DETERRENCE
- PUNISHING the INDIVIDUAL DISCOURAGES THEM From FUTUTE OFFEDNING
- ‘MAKING an EXAMPLE’ of Them may ALSO SERVE as DETERRENT to PUBLIC At Large
Explain the AIM of PUNISHMENT - INCAPACITICATION (aka protection)
- the USE of PUNISHMENT to REMOVE the OFFENDERS’ CAPACITY to OFFEND AGAIN
- POLICIES in DIFFERENT SOCIETIES have Included Imprisonment , Execution, the Cutting Of Hands and Chemical Castration