The Crimean War Flashcards
Poor administration in terms of supplies
• a request for supplies had to go through eight departments before being approved, would then take months to arrive
e.g General Airey sent a request November 1854 to England for 3000 tents and 100 hospital marquees - April 1855 this requisition hadn’t been approved
Failures of Raglan in his appointment
• Raglan had spent his 50 years Army experience in staff work, had never commanded a formation larger than a battalion
Raglan poor communication 1854 Battle of Alma
• British lacked a clear tactic as Raglan failed to relay the French plan to his troops, at one point ordered the British to lie down
Raglan poor communication 1854 Battle of Balaclava
• Raglan orders Lucan to ‘seize the guns’ - unclear instructions, results in 113 British troops dying in the Charge of the Light Brigade
• However, Lucan and Nolan failed to clarify these instructions - lack of responsibility adopted by his subordinates
Raglan inheriting a situation where the Commissariat was not fit for purpose
• Raglan was frustrated with Commissiary-General Filder
• Raglan requested more land transport at the start of the campaign but was refused
• A railway from the port to the battlefront was sanctioned in his home, but not completed until after his death
Failings of Admiral Boxer
• Supplies were piled up in port in the open - unorganised, food rotting, unable to be transported six miles to Sevastopol
Poor transportation
•Heavy rains of 1854-55 storm meant that supplies couldn’t be transported six miles to Sevastopol front lines
• pack mules couldn’t transport goods as they had starved
Overcrowding in hospitals emergency measure
Hospital huts made out of storm wreckage
Issue of disease in the Crimea
• more men died from disease than wounds
• Cholera especially weakened groups at Alma
• amputation death rate 25%
Raglan’s poor medical staff
• Dr Hall, Inspector-General of Hospitals refused to acknowledge issue with medical supplies and sanitation
Nightingale funding supplies in the Crimea
• used £30,000 fund raised by The Times, illustrating how poor administration was
Impact of Roger Fenton’s photos
• had a significant impact as displayed in 26 exhibitions in England
• ‘valley of death’ photograph aroused deep concerns (though not a real battle site)
• photographs of Balaclava harbour and developing railway illustrated issues with supplies
Downside of Fenton’s photographs
• Fenton was a commercial photographer, not permitted to take gory pictures highlighting realities of war as they wouldn’t sell
• Camera technology not advanced, subjects couldn’t move or photo wouldn’t be clear (photos staged)
Political impact of Russell’s reportage
Lord Aberdeen resigned from PM position
Significance of reportage of William Russell
• wrote eye witness accounts of Battle of Alma and Siege of Sevastopol - established close contact with junior officers, Raglan ordered them to stop speaking to Russell to prevent further exposure
• Russell was senior correspondent for The Times. Used as a key element of John Delane’s campaign
• Russell and the Times raised £30,000 fund to support Seacole and Nightingale
Downside of Russell’s reportage
Not the only news reporter - Illustrated London News, The Daily News and The Morning Herald also sent out correspondents