The Constitutional and Legal Response to Political Extremism and the Nature of Support for Democracy (1945-49) Flashcards
When had the government attempted to (unsuccessfully) pass emergency legislation? Why had they been unsuccessful?
- 3 times across the late 1950s and early 1960s
- The SPD and FDP would not support the introduction of these laws
When were the Emergency Laws passed, and what were 2 reasons why?
- 1968
- It was a condition for the SPD to enter the Grand Coalition, and was seen as increasingly necessary as the cold war intensified in the 1960s
What powers did the Emergency Laws give the government? List 3.
- Intercepting mail
- Tapping telephones
- House searches
What were 2 differences between the Emergency Laws in the FRG, and emergency measures in previous eras in German history?
- Although it allowed the suspension of civil liberties, it was precise on the period of time and the circumstances in which they could be applied
- There were also restrictions on emergency legislation
Give 3 examples of restrictions on emergency legislation.
- The Bundestag could not be dissolved
- The Bundestag would decide when the emergency was over
- It could not abolish checks and balances on the power of any branches of government
How successful can the introduction of these emergency powers be said to have been?
- Very successful, as by the end of the 1970s, there was much less terrorist activity
What was a measure taken by the government in the 1970s to further control extremism?
- In 1972 the Anti-Radical Decree was passed, which allowed for the political vetting of everyone applying for a state job (from teaching to the civil service)
To what degree did the government manage to control the population as a result of these measures?
- By 1977 they had 6000 people under surveillance
What were 2 reactions to the level of control the government had?
- It was criticised by the liberal press
- Fear of terrorism caused the public to support these measures
What were the 4 key elements of the Allies’ de-Nazification policies?
- Making German people visit concentration camps so that they could see and were forced to accept the evil nature of the Nazi regime
- War tribunals to try leading Nazis for retribution, and to show the rest of the world the criminality of the Nazi regime
- The banning of the Nazi Party
- The screening of former Nazis to make sure they didn’t return to their former positions in sectors such as the civil service and the justice system
What were the Nuremberg Trials? Why were they held in Nuremberg?
- War crime trials of leading Nazis who had neither committed suicide, nor escaped
- Nuremberg had been where Hitler would hold his annual, massive party rallies
How long did the Nuremberg Trials last, and what was their outcome?
- November 1945 to October 1946
- Of the 22 defendants, 12 were sentenced to death, 3 to life imprisonment, 4 were given shorter prison sentences, and 3 were acquitted
What were 6 limitations of the war tribunals?
- Some minor figures faced prosecution instead of their superiors
- When one aspect of the Nazi regime was focused on, such as the High Command, the Allies were selective when deciding who to try- this meant that some escaped justice while their colleagues didn’t
- Some responsible for war crimes left Germany, or went into hiding
- Some escaped punishment by claiming that they were only following orders (one-third of the guards in the Bergen-Belsen camp were acquitted as a result of doing this)
- The Allies could not agree if the tribunals were for the purpose of punishment or rehabilitation for the millions of minor participants in the Nazi regime
- Trials were mostly halted in 1948 as the cold war took precedence- however, it was often the most serious and complex cases that were delayed
How many people had the Allies arrested by the end of 1946?
- 250,000
What were 4 issues the Allies faced when trying to de-Nazify the rest of the country?
- They couldn’t tell who was a Nazi and who wasn’t, seeing as some people had to join the Nazi Party in order to keep their jobs
- There were too many problems with the scale of the process
- Many former Nazis were needed in Germany (for example in Bonn, 102 out of 112 doctors had been Nazis)
- The young had been indoctrinated