the composition, role and function of parliament Flashcards
what is the legislature
the legislature is a representative body that is intended to reflect the sentiment and opinions of the public. The early legislature was created to provide adive for the executive/monarch and represent the interests of various political groups. They are the branch of governement empowered to make laws.
what is the difference between a unicameral legislature and a bicameral legislature?
unicameral has one chmaber while bicameral has two chambers.
what funcations does bicameralism have?
- checks on the first chmaber, this is especially important if there is a landslide majority.
- more effective checks upon the executive.
- broaden representation.
- scrtunity of legislation.
- consitutional longstop-delay bills
criticisms of bicameralism
unnecessarily costly
work could be covered by a single stremlined chamber
not representitive
can create consitutional stalemate
what does the legislature do
- legislation, however this role has passed to the executive although the legislature remains significant in a watchdog/scrutiny role.
- representation: to represent public opinion.
- oversight of the executive: accountability
- debate
traditionally who were the house of lords
HofL was based on hereditary peers and the two chmabers enjoyed equal status however with the extention of the franchise the powers of the HofL were trimmed.
20th century changes to the house of lords
life peerages act 1958: diverify memebership and bring in experts
trimming of powers parliament act 1911: removed the wpoer of permanent veto
Parliament act 1949: limiations on the powers of delay.
now viewed as a priority
what changes did labour make in 1998
abolition of hereditary peerages
what work is preformed by the house of lords
- consideration and revision of bills from the house of commons. they examine amend and reject bills.
- innititation of non-controversial legislation 1/4 spreads the workload.
- power of delay, they can hold up legislation for relection and reconsideration.
- general debate-less partisan
- scrutinising eu legislation
arguements in favour for further refrom of the house of lords
- a phase two was always intended as the HofL still damages centre-left governements
- PM makes nomiations/appointments therefore the house of Lords does not have legitimacy.
- should reflect britian today
arguements against further reforms for the house of lords
- they provide valuable scrutiny of governmental work because they are chose for a particular reason
- diversity in knowledge they are all experts on something
- they have always has a spirt of independence.
the house of lords should become an elected chamber
they cannot be removed
elections are centeral to democracy
gives them legitimacy
the house of lords should not become an elected chamber
rival the house of commons create competition made a useful contribution have another job they are experts
the house of commons
- part of the legislature
- legislative proposals orginiate with the executive then are debated in the house of commons
what are public bills
they alter the general law of the land and therefore impact the whole community.
most public bills are givernement bills and are brought through by the relevant minister
they have a first reading/introduction
followed by a second reading (debate)
then a committtee stage (detailed examiniation/consideration of admendments)
then the report stage where the committee stuff is reported back
finally a third reading
what are private bills
promoted by orgainisatations outside the house such as local authority or a company and affect a limited section of the community
private members bills
introduced by an mp or peer not a minister
-chnage for whole population
-either top 20 ballot or 10 minute bill
-few becomelaws
-lack of opportunity
-generally cover areas with no strict party view
example the abortion act
watchdog function
- voice of citiozens/their consituency
- national debate
- recruiting for jr ministers/ministers
who are MPS
they are elected represenatives from a single memeber consituency. Each consituency varies in size and socio-economic makeup.
they are elected under the party label and opperate in parliament as a collective body.
obligations of MPS
- the party: toe-the-party-line they are elected under the party label
- the consituency- they elect them, meantr to represent them, burke way or what they actually think way?
- the nation
- conscience/speacil interest
potential conflict between oblications
-party lines and/or consitency and/or personal may all conflict
what kind of system does the uk have
the uk has a representaive syste, with regular and free elections using the first past the post system
the different ways MPS could be represenative
- they represent the interest of their cosistuency who elected them
- they are socially representative
- they are representative of party interests
- they are representaive in a a burke way
how soically representaive are MPs?
middle class+(labour: professionals barristers, teachers etc. conserative: city/business), middle aged, public schooled: loads from eton, oxbridge: ppe, white, male. Very unrepresentative
they are not a microcosm/mirror image of scoeity.