The Cabinet and the PM Flashcards
what is cabinet?
made up of the heads of each department (usually 22 to 23)
the policy-making body of government
the relationship between cabinet and the Prime Minister: what is the current relationship between the cabinet and prime minister?
The cabinet is formally responsible for policy-making
however, in recent times, it has been more usual for decisions to be taken elsewhere, and is often claimed that the executive is now dominated by the Prime Minister to an undue degree
some commentators have argued that the result has been a rise of presidential government — this is the idea that leadership is becoming much more personalised and that prime ministers are much less dependent on cabinet
presidential government refers to an executive dominated by one individual (a strong and dominant prime minister)
factors that affect the relationship between cabinet and the Prime Minister
management skills of the Prime Minister
The Prime Minister‘s ability to set the agenda
The use of committees and informal groups to take decisions
development of the Prime Minister‘s office and Cabinet office
impact of wider political and economic situations
factors that affect the relationship between cabinet and the Prime Minister: MANAGEMENT SKILLS OF THE PRIME MINISTER
A determined and strong prime minister will find it easier to assert control over the cabinet
The right to appoint and dismiss ministers can be used to reshape the executive, to remove poor performers and marginalise opponents, but this power should be used carefully
for example, Margaret Thatcher promoted supporters such as Nigel Lawson and Norman Tebbit in order to build a cabinet in our own image, however by the end of the decade her dominance of the cabinet and alienation of senior colleagues was starting to undermine her position
The resignation of deputy prime minister Sir Geoffrey Howe triggered a leadership challenge in 1990 and when Thatcher needed the support of her cabinet she found that goodwill had evaporated at the top, leading directly to her resignation
factors that affect the relationship between cabinet and the Prime Minister: THE PRIME MINISTER’S ABILITY TO SET THE AGENDA
decisions are rarely, if ever, taken in cabinet by holding a vote
The views of the most senior figures will usually command more weight and most ministers will be too concerned with their individual departmental responsibilities to challenge the consensus view on a matter of which they may have limited knowledge
The prime minister’s traditional right to chair cabinet meetings and to sum up at the end is an important source of influence, they can also keep certain items off the agenda of Cabinet meetings
for example, Harold Wilson refused to allow discussion of devaluation of the pound in the period between 1964 and 1967, even though several ministers wanted to open up the argument
factors that affect the relationship between cabinet and the Prime Minister: USE OF COMMITTEES AND INFORMAL GROUPS TO TAKE DECISIONS
since 1945, Prime Minister‘s have made increasing use of Cabinet committees to take decisions, which are later ratified by the full cabinet
by choosing the membership of these committees and chairing the most important ones or placing this responsibility in the hands of an ally, the Prime Minister can exercise a significant degree of control
for instance, Theresa May decided to chair three important committees, including the one dealing with the crucial issue of Britain’s exit from the EU
many decisions are taken in informal groups or bilateral meetings involving the Prime Minister and one colleague
for example, the decision to place the management of interest rates in the hands of the Bank of England was taken by Tony Blair and Gordon Brown in a private meeting and the rest of the cabinet were informed later
under the coalition, the presence of two parties in government meant that it was necessary to have more discussion of policy in cabinet
yet even then, an informal body known as the Quad (David Cameron, Nick Clegg and their two most senior colleagues, Chancellor George Osborne and Chief Treasury Secretary Danny Alexander) met regularly to resolve differences between the coalition partners
factors that affect the relationship between cabinet and the Prime Minister: DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE AND CABINET OFFICE
The Prime Minister has access to more resources than other ministers, they have a Prime Minister‘s Office in number 10 Downing Street staffed by civil servants and special advisors drawn from the governing party
Harold Wilson created the Policy Unit in 1974 to enable the Prime Minister to gain an overview and drive policy across departments
under Tony Blair, there was close cooperation between the Prime Minister‘s office and the Cabinet Office to support the coordination and implementation of policy
David Cameron initially adopted a more ‘hands off’ approach to government departments, allowing individual ministers more autonomy than under Blair and Brown but, after some policy embarrassments, he strengthened the centre once again with the creation of a Policy and Implementation Unit in 2011
The Press Office, which handles the governments presentation in the media, also works closely with the Prime Minister — under Blair, it gained enhanced importance as part of a newly created Communications and Strategy Directorate in Downing Street
factors that affect the relationship between cabinet and the Prime Minister: IMPACT OF WIDER POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC SITUATIONS
The degree to which the Prime Minister can dominate the cabinet is affected by a variety of external pressures
A prime minister with a large Parliamentary majority and a united party, such as Tony Blair in the wake of the 1997 Labour landslide, will find it much easier to dominate than one like John Major, whose control over the House of Commons was precarious from 1992 onwards
popularity with the public, a booming economy and an ability to master events rather than appear as their victim all strengthen the hand of the Prime Minister in dealing with the cabinet
Margaret Thatcher’s standing improved enormously after victory in the 1982 Falklands War
factors that affect the relationship between cabinet and the Prime Minister: IMPACT OF WIDER POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC SITUATIONS
Gordon Brown
on the other hand, Gordon Brown was harmed by his decision not to hold a general election on becoming Prime Minister after Blair and his authority was further undermined by the financial crash of 2007-08
his decision not to hold a general election meant that his government appeared to lack legitimacy and meant that he was dubbed ‘Bottler Brown’ in the media
in 2009, his position within cabinet was revealed to be very weak when it became known that Alistair Darling (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) had refused to take another post so Brown could replace him with Ed Balls
this showed Gordon Brown to have little authority, his ministers did not listen to him
he had to accept Alistair Darling‘s stubbornness and could not force him to move because a high-profile resignation from his Chancellor at a time of economic crisis would be very damaging
what does the balance of power between the Prime Minister and Cabinet depend on?
The balance of power between the Prime Minister and Cabinet depends on the circumstances of the time
arguments to suggest that the cabinet remains an important body: it is responsible for approval of government decisions
The Cabinet approves government decisions, so gives the government legitimacy in the eyes of Parliament and the public
A minister who cannot accept the agreed line, such as Robin Cook over the Iraq war, should resign from cabinet
arguments to suggest that the cabinet remains an important body: the Prime Minister often recognises the need for Cabinet support
on important issues, the Prime Minister recognises the need for Cabinet support
for example, after completing his renegotiation of the U.K.’s membership of the EU in 2016, David Cameron presented the deal to a full Cabinet meeting
The cabinet is also important in times of national crisis, such as military conflict, although (as in the Falklands war in 1982) day-to-day decisions may be taken by a smaller War Cabinet of key ministers and armed service leaders, whose decisions are reported to the full cabinet later
arguments to suggest that the cabinet remains an important body: it is the place where the programme of government business is discussed
The cabinet is where the programme of government business is discussed
in theory, it is also where disagreements between government departments are resolved
this demonstrates that it is an important body
arguments to suggest that the cabinet remains an important body: the UK does not have a presidential system
The UK does not have a presidential system in reality, even if it has some of the characteristics of one
The fall of Margaret Thatcher demonstrates the continuing importance of keeping the support of cabinet
this case demonstrated that a presidential system in which the Prime Minister dominates and therefore alienates some of their most important senior colleagues is not sustainable
arguments to suggest that the Prime Minister is the dominant force in cabinet and that the cabinet may not be an important body anymore: decisions are commonly taken outside of cabinet
decisions are commonly taken by Cabinet committees that are controlled by the Prime Minister, or in small groups and bilateral meetings
such as the 1997 Blair/Brown decision to hand control of interest rates to the Bank of England
cabinet’s role is to merely ‘rubberstamp’ decisions taken elsewhere