Ministerial Responsibility Flashcards
what is the nature of ministerial responsibility?
ministerial responsibility is a convention, not a fixed law that can be enforced
there are no rules governing the circumstances in which ministers must take responsibility by resigning
political circumstances impact how the convention is used in practice
individual ministerial responsibility: what is individual ministerial responsibility?
individual ministerial responsibility is the principle by which ministers are responsible for their personal conduct and for their departments, including the running of their departments and its policies
individual ministerial responsibility: what is the official definition?
The official definition of individual ministerial responsibility is set out in the Ministerial Code issued at the start of a new government by the Prime Minister
The latest version states that “ministers have a duty to Parliament to account, and be held to account, for the policies, decisions and actions of their departments and agencies”
individual ministerial responsibility: what are ministers obliged to do and what are they responsible for?
ministers are obliged to give accurate information to Parliament, if they knowingly mislead Parliament then they are expected to resign
they are responsible for deciding how to conduct themselves but “only remain in office for so long as they retain the confidence of the Prime Minister”
The prime minister is the “ultimate judge of the standards of behaviour expected of a minister and the appropriate consequences of a breach of those standards”
individual ministerial responsibility: when are ministers not expected to resign?
A minister is not expected to resign over a minor mistake
The business of government is so large and complex which means that ministers cannot possibly know everything that goes on within their department
individual ministerial responsibility: what does it depend on?
it works out differently in different situations, it is ultimately unpredictable
individual ministerial responsibility: case study illustrating the flexibility of individual responsibility
Charles Clarke was Home Secretary in Blair’s government and was challenged by opposition MPs in 2006 over the inability of the Home Office to account for the movements of over 1000 foreign prisoners after they had served their sentences in the UK
they had been freed without being considered for deportation and Clarke had admitted that his department had taken their “eye off the ball” but he also told the BBC that “I certainly don’t think I have a duty to the public to go — I have a duty to sort this out”
it was reported that he privately offered to resign but the Prime Minister initially backed him to continue in office, although 10 days later Blair reshuffled cabinet and sacked Clarke following poor results for Labour in local elections
this demonstrates that ministerial responsibility depends on the circumstances at the time
individual ministerial responsibility: what does the fate of an individual minister depend on?
The fate of an individual minister depends on how serious the issue is perceived to be, the level of criticism in parliament and the media when a mistake is made as well as the attitude of the Prime Minister of the day
individual ministerial responsibility: what was Alistair Campbell’s golden rule?
Alistair Campbell, Blair’s press secretary, apparently had a ‘golden rule’ that a minister would have to leave if they were at the centre of a media storm for longer than a given length of time
individual ministerial responsibility: what has happened since the 1980s to erode individual ministerial responsibility?
since the late 1980s, many government functions have been delegated to executive agencies under a director-general rather than a minister
this has led to doubt about who is accountable and has eroded individual ministerial responsibility
The minister is responsible for overall policy while the head of the agency exercises operational responsibility, but it is often hard to determine who should be accountable
for example, in 1995, the Home Secretary controversially fired by director-general of the Prisons Service following criticism of the escape of prisoners from Parkhurst jail
individual ministerial responsibility: what have the blurring lines of accountability led to?
blurring lines of accountability mean that civil servants have been held responsible for departmental errors rather than ministers
when traditionally, they were anonymous, taking neither credit nor blame for the actions of the government but this has been eroded
in 2012, the Transport Secretary admitted that mistakes had been made in the awarding of a franchise to companies to run trains on the West Coast Main Line
three civil servants were suspended as a result, one of whom launched a successful legal action to get them reinstated
individual ministerial responsibility: what did constitutional expert Professor Vernon Bogdanor make the case for?
constitutional expert Professor Vernon Bogdanor made the case for the traditional relationship between ministers and civil servants
he argued that ministers were responsible for ensuring that officials had the necessary skills to carry out the work of the department and that ministers should be in a position to assure parliament that all is in order
therefore, ministers should be held responsible for mistakes made within their departments rather than civil servants
individual ministerial responsibility: what is the most common cause of resignations?
personal misconduct is a more common cause of resignations than failures of policy or administration
sometimes, the impression that a minister’s behaviour has fallen short of expected standards has been enough for their departure from office
for example, Peter Mandelson was obliged to resign twice from Blair’s first government due to a perception of wrongdoing
in one instance, he was accused of using his influence to fast track a passport application by an Indian businessman but was later exonerated by an independent inquiry
in another case, it was revealed he was buying a house with the help of a loan supplied by a Cabinet colleague, whose business affairs were being investigated by Mandelson’s department
in both cases, he had to resign simply to clear the air, regardless of the facts or whether he actually did anything wrong
individual ministerial responsibility: summary of what this convention means
individual ministerial responsibility is the convention that a minister should resign if their department makes a serious political or personal error
ministers are individually responsible for the work of their departments and answerable to Parliament for their department’s activities
they are expected to accept responsibility for any failure that happens in their department
collective ministerial responsibility: case study
Iain Duncan Smith resigned in 2016 as Work and Pensions Secretary under Cameron’s government, stating that he could not support or accept cuts to disability benefits
he objected to the fact that Chancellor George Osborne had made other changes in his budget to benefit high earners — in his opinion, Osbourne was too inclined to make cuts for narrow political reasons rather than in the national economic interest
Duncan Smith also disliked the Treasury’s demand that the Department of Work and Pensions should take public responsibility for the cuts that he did not himself support
personality differences may have also played a part — it was widely believed that Osborne considered Duncan Smith to be too intellectually limited to take responsibility for such complex government policies
Duncan Smith’s desire to see Britain leave the EU also brought him into conflict with Cameron and Osborne and may have played a part in the clash