Testimonial privileges? Flashcards
If you are asked whether federal or state priv law should apply on the exam, how should you answer?
In fed case
2) arising under fed substantive law (fed question/crim Law)
3) Privs are governed by fed law
In fed case
1) based in diversity,
2) state substantive law applies to claims
3) apply law of state.
Who can assert priv?
Thee holder of it.
What must a communication be to be privelged?
Confidential– not intended to be disclosed to 3rd parties.
How is Priv waived?
1) Failure to claim it
2) voluntary disclosure of priv matter by holder
3) contractual provision waiving it
If the priv holder doesn’t consent, and someone discloses wrongfully the info, what happens?
Priv still applies
If a joint holder of priv waived it, what happens?
Other joint holder’s priv is not waived
What is modern view of eavesdroppers and priv?
In absence of Negligence by person claiming priv, an eaves dropper is prohibited from testifying.
If a client reasonably believes an attorney is a member of the bar but the attorney is not, is their priv?
Yes.
If a client is not seeking prof services of attorney when comment is made, what happens?
No priv.
When are statements to an attorney by corporate officials/employees protected?
Statements are protect if employees were authorized/directed by Corp to make statements
Since priv only applies to confidential communication, what happens if there are reps of the att/client in the room? What about communication through agents like admins/accountants/messengers?
Still confidential. Priv survives. COnfidential still.
If an attorney sends a client to a Doc to get an exam, what result?
NO phys patient priv because no treatment is complicated.
Att Cli priv because as long as Dr not called as testifying expert.
IF former joint clients sue each other, what happens to the atty priv they once had?
Doesn’t apply as between them .
When is there no att-cli priv?
If attys services were used to aid in planning/commissh of crime OR
2) client should have known was a crime
OR
where Cli put legal services at issue in case (tax fraud–she relied on advice of atty.. no priv)
Common relevant to breach of duty in dispute between att client
COmm sent to an issue between parties claim through deceased client
When does general phys-patient majority rule apply in fed court?
Case sitting in diversity.