Testimonial Privileges Flashcards
Testimonial Privileges - General Concept
- permit a person to refuse to disclose, and prohibit others from disclosing certain confidential info in judicial proceedings
Fed vs State Privilege Law - When They Apply
- privileges are governed FED common law in a fed court case arising under fed substantive law
- privileges governed by STATE law in fed court case based on div jur, where state substantive law applies to parties’ claims + defenses
Major Privileges Recognized by Federal Courts
- attorney-client privilege
- spousal immunity
- privilege for confidential marital communications
- psychotherapist/social worker client privilege
- clergy-penitent privilege
- governmental privileges
Persons Who May Assert Privilege
- privileges = personal to the holder -> generally can be asserted only by the holder
- sometimes person w/ whom confidence was shared may assert the privilege on the holder’s behalf though
Confidentiality
- to be privileged, communication must be shown or presumed to have been made in confidence (not intended to be disclosed to third parties)
Commenting on Privileges
- forbidden -> neither counsel for the parties nor the judge may comment on someone’s claim of a privilege
Waiver
Any privilege is waived by:
1) failure to claim the privilege
2) voluntary disclosure of the privileged matter by the privilege holder OR
3) a contractual provision waiving in advance the right to claim a privilege
NOT waived by:
- someone wrongfully disclosing info w/o privilege holder’s consent
- waiver by one joint holder does not affect right of the other holder to assert the privilege
Eavesdroppers
- privilege based on confidential communications is not destroyed because it was overheard by someone whose presence is unknown to the parties
- under modern view, in absence of negligence by he person claiming the privilege, even the eavesdropper would be prohibited from testifying
Attorney-Client Privilege - Elements
Applies to:
- confidential communications
- between attorney and client (or representatives of either)
- made during professional legal consultation
- unless the privilege is waived or an exception is applicable
Attorney-Client Relationship
- “attorney” = member of the bar, OR someone the client reasonably believes to be a member of the bar
- “client” must be seeking the professional services of the attorney at the time of the communication
- disclosures made before attorney accepts or declines the cases are covered by the privilege
Corporate Clients (attorney-Client Privilege)
- corporations are “clients” within the meaning of the privilege
- statements made by officials or employees to an attorney are protected if the employees were authorized or directed by the corporation to make such statements
Confidential Communication
- privilege applies to communications only
- does NOT apply to underlying info, pre-existing docs, or physical ev
- to be protected, a communication must be confidential (not intended to be disclosed to third parties)
-> communications made in known presence and hearing of a stranger are not privileged - reps of attorney or client may be present without destroying the privilege
Attorney-Client Privilege - Communications Through Agents
- communications made to third parties are confidential + covered by privilege if necessary to transmit info between attorney + client
- ex: administrative assistants, messengers, accountants
- communications between client + doctor during exam made at attorney’s request -> physician-patient privilege DOESN’T apply because no treatment contemplated, but attorney-client DOES apply, as long as doctor not called as testifying expert
Attorney-Client Privilege - Joint Client Rule
- if 2 or more clients w/ a common interest consult same attorney, their communications w/ the attorney concerning the common interest are privileged as to third parties
- BUT if joint clients later have a dispute w/ each other concerning common interest + one client sues other, privilege does NOT apply as between them