Character Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Character Evidence - Basic Concept

A
  • refers to person’s general propensity or disposition (for honesty, fairness, peacefulness, violence, etc.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Instances When Character Evidence CAN Be Offered

A

As substantive evidence:
- to prove a person’s character where their character is directly in issue in the case (an essential element of a claim or defense)
- to serve as circumstantial evidence of how a person probably acted during the events of the case (propensity evidence -> admissible in FEW situations)

  • evidence of a witness’s bad character for truthfulness might be offered for impeachment purposes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Methods of Proving Character

A
  • evidence of person’s specific acts
  • opinion testimony of a witness who knows the person AND
  • testimony as to the person’s general reputation in the community
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Defendant’s Character in Criminal Case

A
  • prosecution cannot INITIATE evidence of def’s bad character to show conduct in conformity
  • BUT def can introduce evidence of own good character to show innocence
    -> if def does this, prosecution can rebut with evidence of def’s BAD character
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Criminal Cases - How Def Proves Character

A
  • character witnesses can testify re def’s good reputation for a particular trait
    -> may also give their personal opinion concerning that trait of he defendant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Def’s Credibility vs. Character

A
  • merely taking the stand does not put def’s character in issue
  • BUT it DOES put def’s credibility at issue -> prosecution can offer impeachment evidence, but can’t offer substantive character evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Criminal Cases - Prosecution’s Options in Response to Def Character Witnesses

A

Once def opens door, prosecution can do either or both of following:
- cross-examine def’s character witness re basis for their testimony by asking questions about specific acts of def that show def’s bad character for trait in question
-> this option is permitted to show witness’s lack of knowledge, NOT really about proving bad character
- prosecution can call its own character witnesses to provide reputation or opinion testimony
-> think their witnesses would need to stick to the particular trait in question (the one for which def opened the door)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Victim’s Character in a Criminal Case - When Def Can Initiate

A
  • except for sexual assault cases, def can introduce reputation or opinion ev of bad character trait of victim when relevant to establish innocence
    -> typically no relevance, but relevant when def claims self-defense + argues victim was first aggressor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Victim’s Character - Prosecution’s Rebuttal When Defendant Initiates

A
  • once def has introduced ev of a victim’s bad character for a pertinent trait *usually violence), prosecution may rebut with reputation or opinion evidence of:
    -> victim’s good character for the same trait
    -> def’s bad character for the same trait
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Victim’s Character - Non-Propensity Purposes

A
  • evidence of victim’s character may also be relevant to prove def’s state of mind at time of altercation
  • ex: if def knew at t of altercation that victim had violent reputation or had committed violent acts in the past, ev may be used to prove def acted reasonably in responding to victim’s aggression
  • note that prohibition on ev of specific acts doesn’t apply if you’re offering the ev for a non-propensity purpose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Victim’s Character - When Prosecution Can Initiate

A
  • applies when rebutting self-defense claim in homicide case
  • allows prosecution to offer evidence of victim’s good character for peacefulness
  • in such instances, ev of ANY kind (not just character witnesses) that victim was first aggressor (ex: eyewitness testimony that victim struck first) opens door to ev that victim had good character for peacefulness
  • prosecution can introduce such ev regardless of whether def has introduced character ev of victim’s generally violent propensity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Past Behavior of Rape Victims

A
  • ev offered to prove sexual behavior or sexual disposition of rape victims in civil or crim proceedings involving sexual misconduct generally inadmissible

Exceptions:
- crim cases: specific instances of sexual behavior admissible to prove someone other than def is source of physical evidence, + instances of sexual behavior between victim + def admissible by prosecution for any reason + by defense to prove consent
- civil cases: ev of victim’s sexual behavior admissible if not excluded by any other rule AND its probative value substantially outweighs danger of harm to victim or unfair prejudice to any party
-> ev of alleged victim’s reputation admissible only if placed in controversy by victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Character Evidence + Civil Cases

A
  • generally NOT admissible to prove character in conformity
  • BUT ALL forms of character ev are admissible (including specific acts) when character is directly in issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Civil Cases Where Character is Directly in Issue

A
  • defamation cases where truth is a defense (plaintiff’s character at issue)
  • negligent hiring or entrustment cases (hired/entrusted person’s character at issue)
  • child custody cases (parents’ character at issue)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Other Misconduct - General Rule

A
  • evidence of a person’s other crimes, wrongs, or acts is generally inadmissible if offered solely to prove conduct in conformity/propensity
    -> i.e. can’t be offered just to suggest def tends to do bad things + therefore more likely of the charged conduct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Other Misconduct - Instances Where Admissible - Overview

A

MIMIC

  • evidence of a person’s other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible if relevant to some issue other than their character or propensity to commit the crime charged
    -> i.e. trying to establish something specific about the charged crime
  • usually offered in crim cases, but could also apply in civil ones
17
Q

Other Misconduct - List of Instances Where Admissible

A

Motive
Intent
Mistake (lack of)
Identity
Common plan or scheme

  • not a comprehensive list - ev can be admitted as long as relevant to ANY purpose OTHER than def’s general character/propensity to commit the crime charged
18
Q

Other Misconduct - Requirements for Admissibility

A
  • may be proved by any evidence - witness testimony, def’s criminal conviction, etc.
  • must be sufficient ev to support a jury finding that def committed the other misconduct
  • misconduct is also subject to the usual Rule 403 standard (probative value must not be substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice)
19
Q

Other Misconduct - Notice + Criminal Cases

A
  • in crim case, prosecutor must provide reasonable notice of any ev of this type that prosecutor intends to offer at trial
  • notice must usually be in writing + provided in advance of trial
    -> court may excuse lack of pretrial notice for good cause though
  • the notice must articulate the non-propensity purpose for which the ev will be offered + the reasoning that supports the purpose
20
Q

Reminders for MIMIC Ev

A
  • only admissible if def is actually contesting the non-character issue
  • if a MIMIC category is satisfied, prosecution can use the ev of misconduct as part of its case-in-chief
    -> means that b/c MIMIC ev is offered for NON propensity purpose, it is admissible even if def hasn’t open the door on character ev
21
Q

Def’s Similar Misconduct in Sex Crime Cases

A
  • ev of a def’s other acts of sexual assault or child molestation is admissible in a criminal or civil case where def is accused of committing an act of sexual assault or child molestation
  • party intending to offer such ev must disclose it to def 15 days before trial (or later with good cause)
  • such ev is relevant for ANY purpose, including propensity