test3- profiling and sexual assault Flashcards
definition of “criminal profiling”
technique for identifying the major personality and behavioral characteristics of an individual based on the analyses of the crimes he or she has committed
characteristics commonly included in a criminal profile
- age, sex, employment status, intelligence level, educational history, hobbies, family background, residence, criminal history, psychosexual development, post-offence behavior, etc.
- try to determine when you don’t have a witness
when are criminal profiles most commonly used?
- violent crimes
- serial killers & rapists
purpose of criminal profiling?
- if their is a similar crime in the future
- narrow list/search for suspects
- provide new lines of inquiry
- helps set traps/ flush out an offender
- determines whether a threatening note should be taken seriously
- advice on how to interrogate a suspect
- tell prosecution how to break down defenders in cross examination
- find motive
what is another name used to refer to criminal profiling? what are these professionals referred to as?
- criminal investigative analysis (broader focus- more than just profiling)
- professionals referred to as ‘behavioral investigative advisors’ or ‘criminal investigative analysts’
why develop criminal profile for consecutive crimes?
- anticipation of happening again
- fear of escalation
- investment in profiling (don’t do for just one offs)
Malleus Maleficarum
- profile of witches (15th century)
- authors were inquisitors, didn’t have authority
- misleading advertisements
- read to children as bedtime story
- witches= women with strong personality who defies convention and doesn’t cry at trial (paradoxical)
- used in Salem witch trials in 17th century
what did malleus maleficarum claim that witches did?
-prevent conception, injuries to live stalk, baby dies, bad storms causing damage, made penises disappear (only one that didn’t make sense)
Jack the Ripper (1888)
- brutally murdered prostitutes in alleyways on streets of London
- profile developed by Dr. Phillips and Dr. Bonds (one of 1st criminal profiles used)- never identified
- examined victims, crime scene, wounds for insight into psychological makeup
- profile: quite/ harmless looking, wear cloak, promiscuous/ hyper sexual, neat/clean looking
Dr. Phillips and Dr. Bonds
- developed profile for ‘Jack the Ripper’
- first criminal profiles used in criminal investigation
New York’s Mad Bomber (1940)
-profile referred to to justify profiling; by James Brussel
-planted bombs around New York city that escalated (avoided injury, wanted to destroy property and ensue terror)
=George Matesky (fit most characteristics described by profile, but was 54, had disease but not heart)
James Brussel
- created profile for the ‘mad bomber’
- profile: middle aged male, suffering from paranoia, skilled mechanic, cunning, neat with tools, not interested in women, high school graduate, expert in civil or military ordinance, suffered from heart disease, etc.
how did they identify the ‘mad bomber’?
-looked at who hated the power company, went through employee records, found someone who fit profile/ was skilled mechanic & was injured, saw he wrote many angry letters criticizing the power company
=George Matesky
David Canter
-founder of investigative psychology, origins of field traced back to his involvement in railway rapist (created profile using knowledge of human behaviour)
deductive vs. inductive method of profiling
- Deductive: profile generated through analysis of evidence at crime scene, logical reasoning
- Inductive: profile generated from comparison of that particular offenders crimes with similar crimes committed by others
- often combine the two*
organized-disorganized model
- profiling method used by FBI that assumes crime scenes and background of serial offenders can be categorized as organized (planned. controlled) or disorganized (impulsive/ chaotic crime)
- developed through interviews with those incarcerated
‘cluster’ approach to profiling
statistical technique that classified offenders based on how they search, select and approach victims
‘multiple correspondence analysis (MCA)’ approach to profiling
-examine interrelationship between clusters
criticisms of criminal profiling
- based on classical trait model –> stable traits resulting in consistent pattern over time and situation, which doesn’t account for multiple personalities or behaviors that are impacted by contextual factors
- info in profile vague and ambiguous, could apply to anyone
- profiles thought to not have anymore expertise than bartenders or psychics
Who is the Amazing Randy and how does he relate to profiling?
- magician that taught people there wasn’t anything magical going on
- did astrology profiles of everyone, handed them out and asked if they apply to them, most say yes, realize they are all the same
- argument that this is similar to profilers
Kocsis et al (2002) study
- study looking at whether criminal profilers were any good at developing profiles compared to other groups
- given info about a case and asked to create profile (researchers knew the convicted suspect)
- answered 45MC questions and completed adjective checklist (ACL) describing offender
- RESULTS: all scored about the same
- a rebuttal showed there was a difference
geographical profiling
- investigative technique that uses crime scene locations to predict most likely area where offender resides
- used primarily to prioritize suspects
- assumption is serial criminals don’t travel far to commit crimes
- not useful for traveling offenders
computerized geographical profiling system
-use math models of offender spatial behavior to make predictions about where unknown serial offenders reside
ViCLAS
- database for serious crimes created by the RCMP behavioral science branch
- used nation wide
- prevents linkage blindness and allows them to see where serial offenders are traveling
- ViCLAS specialists go through system
- make statistical judgement
- RCMP refuse to provide access to scientists for further analysis (to eventually enter data and get profile)
what are the 2 classifications for a dangerous offender?
- serious personal injury
2. sexual assault crimes
levels of sexual assault (3)
Level 1. minor physical injury or no injury, can be summary offence (punishment up to 10yrs imprisonment- hard ceilings on how much punishment can give)
Level 2: sexual assault with a weapon, threats, or causing bodily harm (max 14yrs imprisonment)
Level 3: aggravated sexual assault, results in wounding, maiming, disfiguring, or endangering life of victim (max life sentence)