test3- deception Flashcards

1
Q

Cesare Lombroso (1885)

A
  • first person to look at blood pressure with cuff to see if someone lying
  • founder of movement that criminality could be bred out of species of humans
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

William Marston- pneumography

A
  • Frye Criteria; advocated to have him testify with his lie detection device, ruled against (device not generally accepted in field)
  • was a polygrapher; called himself father of numograph (however wasn’t actually inventor)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does a numograph measure?

A

-primarily blood pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does a Polygraph measure?

A
  • measured many things (ANS response)

- skin conductance, heart rate, breathing rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were polygraphs primarily used for until the late 80s in the US?

A
  • employee testing (on hiring or some point during employment to identify theft or drug use on the job)
  • now illegal
  • no longer allowed in court (still used in investigation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

common uses of polygraphs

A
  • criminal investigation
  • interrogation
  • insurance
  • employee testing (limited to specific investigations of job-related wrongdoing)
  • screening (assess candidates reliability and loyalty)
  • polygraph disclosure tests (uncover info about offenders past behavior)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the main element that varies when giving a polygraph ?

A

how the questions are provided/ how user is questioned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Name the three main polygraph techniques

A
  1. relevant/ irrelevant test
  2. comparison questions test (CQT)
  3. concealed information’s test (CIT)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Relevant/ irrelevant polygraph test

A
  • most primitive, not used much
  • ask irrelevant questions and compare response to relevant questions (know ground truth of irrelevant questions so can tell when lying)
  • often used on Dr. Phil
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Comparison Questions Test (polygraph)

A
  • most common technique worldwide
  • relevant, irrelevant, and control/comparison questions asked (repeated multiple times)
  • comparison questions should be emotionally arousing and know ground truth of, usually don’t have reason to lie about, tailored to person, not about issue at hand
  • includes pre-test interview where develop comparison questions, learn about background, and convince suspect of accuracy of test
  • guilty assumed to respond more to relevant Qs, innocent more to irrelevant Qs
  • don’t have to respond to questions but better if do
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Concealed Information Test (polygraph)

A
  • determine if suspect knows info about crime that only person who committed would know
  • ask multiple choice questions, give them time to pick answer (better to answer as know they are listening)
  • measure ANS response (skin conductance) to correct answer
  • only works if remember details of crime and if salient details only known by perpetrator
  • most popular in Japan and Israel
  • not used a lot b/c need many questions for accuracy, hard to come up with them as must be very familiar with case, and not a lot of motivation by polygraphers to switch to diff technique
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how are lab studies conducted to test polygraph accuracy?

A
  • have people lie and tell truth and see if can tell
  • advantage: experimenter knows ground truth
  • disadvantage: limited application to real world (motivational differences)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how are field studies conducted to test polygraph accuracy?

A
  • involve real-life situations, actual suspects and actual polygraph examinations
  • compare original examiners to blind evaluators
  • see where used, if person fund to be guilty and said guilty= success (PROBLEM: conviction doesn’t necessarily mean guilt)
  • could look at cases where DNA evidence said they are guilty
  • many use confessions to establish ground truth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are two ways to establish ground truth?

A
  1. judicial
  2. confessions
    * both have their own issues*
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did CQT lab and field studies discover?

A
  • results do not suggest that polygraphs are very accurate (bust still better than guessing)
  • bias towards false positives (say your lying when telling the truth)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are some CQT countermeasures?

A
  • physical: tongue biting, pressing toes to floor
  • mental: counting backwards from 7
  • Honts, Raskin, Kirchner (1994): showed success with both measures; something mentally taxing while answering can show success
  • can also learn to escape deception if learn rationale underlying CQT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what did CIT lab and field studies discover?

A
  • false positives low, but false negatives high
  • goof at identifying innocent, not as much for guilty
  • Ben, Shakhar & Elaad (2003): accuracy improved with motivation, 5 or more q’s and verbal response
  • in field study, if add more autonomic measures, false neg rate went down a lot and false pos increased slightly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

CIT countermeasures?

A
  • ant-anxiety drugs (ex. diazepam) –> have found to be ineffective
  • other measures not well studied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

which polygraph type should police be more inclined to use and why?

A

CIT b/c lower false positive rate- ppl are innocent until proven guilty, and wouldn’t accuse as many people falsely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Patricj & lacuna (1989) ‘group contingency threat’ study

A
  • in real life there are consequences for polygraphs
  • got ppl to participate from corrections facility, told them there was a bonus for participating
  • told to convince a person you are telling truth, if everyone succeeds, all get bonus, if you fail, no one gets and they get told it was you who failed (increases stakes)
  • Results: no difference between psychopaths and those with APD, no difference between psychopaths and non
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

NRC 2003- review of polygraph evidence

A
  • tried to come up with recommendation regarding the polygraph
  • physiological responses measured by polygraph are not uniquely related to deception (happen for many reasons)
  • theoretical rationale for CQT is weak (compare and relevant questions are weak)
  • lab studies overestimate accuracy
  • no field studies satisfy min criteria for quality study
  • claims about polygraph today are same as those throughout history (claim high accuracy but rarely reflected in research)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

polygraph admissibility in Canada

A
  • not admissible in Canadian criminal court of law

- results first submitted as evidence in US court in Frye v. US, but denied to be admitted

23
Q

R. v. Beland (1987)- polygraph admissibility case

A
  • only evidence was testimony of accomplices (hinged on witness credibility)
  • tried to introduce polygraph evidence; just re-established rules against oath helping (bolstering credibility) which you cant do
  • issue= distraction, as may get into question of if polygraphers are valid experts instead of actual issue
  • if polygraphers had no machine wouldn’t be allowed to testify
  • if whole case hinges on credibility, maybe should be allowed?
24
Q

‘mystique of science’ or ‘aura of infallibility’

A
  • worry that juries are inordinately influenced by scientific backing of the polygraph
  • bias may make polygraph less accurate
  • research done to see if jurors really influenced, found to be spotty with little affect on jurors
  • other things jurors make decision on, but if case hinges on believability, may have an effect
25
Q

brain based methods to investigate deception (2)

A
  1. event related potential- P300

2. FMRI

26
Q

Event related potential- P300

A
  • brain based method to investigate deception
  • measure shift in voltage at particular time after stimulus presented (directly measuring brain response)
  • associated with surprise response (presented infrequently)
  • resistant to manipulation
  • not good evidence, but has been admitted into court
  • Issues: noisy measure, must show many stimuli
27
Q

FMRI

A
  • brain based method to investigate deception
  • measure cerebral blood flow
  • maybe a lie entre in brain that activates when lying
  • lie conditions produce greater activation in prefrontal and anterior cingulate regions compared to truth
  • Issues: requires cooperative person (cant move), must listen/focus on instructions, cant run for too long (habituation signal issues), research based on averaging data across many participants (healthy individuals included), concerns that may influence jurors (scientific)
28
Q

what specific behaviors may be effected by lying?

A
  • facial temperature (tested with thermal cameras-not that accurate)
  • voice stress analysis (pitch)
  • tone of voice or vocal cues
  • body movement (language)
  • micro-expressions
29
Q

what is the best technique when it comes to examining behaviors for lies?

A
  • vocal cues/ the content of story
  • give few details, less plausible, less engaging/ fluent, more nervous, less cooperative
  • deceptions cues easier to pick up when liar is motivated or lie is embarrassing
30
Q

accuracy of professional lie catchers?

A
  • professionals= 55%, students=54% (no difference)
  • people rely on behaviors that lack predictive validity
  • most people have truth-bias
  • only small differences between liars and truth tellers (few cues to rely on)
31
Q

what are police trained with to detect deception?

A

REID technique/ behavioral analysis interview

32
Q

Vrij, Mann & Fisher (2006)

A
  • study that wanted to see what REID technique does in relation to telling if someone is lying
  • students asked to tell a convincing story to interviewer
  • had people rate, using BAI rating scale, 1 to 5, as guide (ex. liars wont make eye contact so no eye contact=1)
  • RESULTS: technique biased towards saying someone is lying when telling truth
33
Q

Behavioral analysis interview assumptions

A
  • liars less helpful, unconcerned about being a suspect
  • exhibit more nervous behaviors
  • answer quickly to knowledge questions, sound less sincere
  • motive questions cause liar to shit positions (be uncomfortable)
  • more evasive about purpose of interview or name someone they believe is innocent
  • less likely to admit a crime has taken place
  • express less confidence in being exonerated, less likely to have informed loved one of the interview
34
Q

name 3 communication types and if they are universal or not

A
  1. spoken and written language- not universal
  2. gestures- only one gesture is universal (pointing)
  3. facial expression- universal
35
Q

hypothesises of facial expressions

A
  1. stemmed for social contamination or

2. are unique and universal

36
Q

what are facial expressions?

A
  • convey emotions
  • universal
  • difficult to completely supress
37
Q

Dr. Paul Ekman

A
  • military research in psych (allowed to help many people)
  • studied Fore tribes in Papua New Guinea, used to test hypothesis of universal facial expressions- found that they were universal
  • developed FACS
  • expression and microexpression training
  • consulting
38
Q

Name the basic emotions (6) -developed by Ekman

A
  • anger
  • disgust
  • happiness
  • fear
  • sadness
  • surprise
  • can be broken down into subcategories*
39
Q

FACS- Ekman & Frisen

A
  • facial action coding system for writing down expressions
  • describes 10,000 possible facial expression, produced by 40 muscles
  • found microexpressions
40
Q

microexpressions

A
  • transformative expression for brief millisecond
  • may be genuine emotional expression when trying not to convey that emotion
  • discovered by Ekman
41
Q

deception detection theory

A

some people naturally good at reading microexpressions which in turn makes them good lie detectors

42
Q

Porter & Brinke (2008) ‘reading inbetween the lies: identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions”

A

-tape people looking at images that are positive, negative or neutral
-people asked to either make
=simulated emotions (fake expression when looking at neutral photo)
=masked (fake an emotion to an emotional photo)
=neutralized (maintain neutral expression)
-recorded inconsistent emotional expression, microexpression, blink rates
-RESUTS: made inconsistent expressions, no complete microexpression (some partial), blink rate higher in genuine than neutral conditions
-overall, judgments were 60% accurate

43
Q

Porter, Woodworth & Birt (2000)- investigation of federal parole officers to detect deception

A
  • parole officers and students watch tapes of personal accounts of serious events (with feedback, without, or feedback + cue info)
  • training given to officers; involved myth dissolution, info provision and practice judgment, feedback and knowledge testing
  • RESULTS: if practice deception judgment with person with training, this improves peoples abilities
  • can also just improve by going through tapes with feedback
44
Q

what 2 dimensions do disorders of deception vary on?

A
  1. whether intentionally or consciously producing symptoms

2. whether motivation is internal or external

45
Q

factitious disorder

A
  • falsification of physical or psychological signs or symptoms, or induction of injury or disease
  • deception behavior evident even in absence of obvious external rewards
  • may be aware they are intentionally producing, but lack insight into underlying psychological motivations
46
Q

Munchausen syndrome by proxy

A
  • rare factitious disorder

- parent falsifies symptoms in child to gain attention or sympathy

47
Q

Malingering

A
  • intentional production of symptoms for external gain

- external motivations may include: punishment avoidance, drug seeking, military avoidance, financial gain, shelter

48
Q

somatoform disorders

A

-often encourage physical tests and invasive procedures- malingering will not

49
Q

malingering explanatory models (3)

A
  1. pathogenic: underlying mental disorder, little empirical support
  2. criminological: focuses on badness; a bad person (APD), in bad circumstances (legal difficulties), who is performing badly (uncooperative)- little empirical support
  3. adaptational: occurs when there is perceived adversarial context, personal stakes are high, and no other viable alternatives are perceived
50
Q

defensive

A

=opposite of malingering, conscious denial or extreme minimalization of physical or psychological symptoms

51
Q

how to study malingering?

A
  1. simulation design: ppl pretend to have specific symptom, used to address whether measure can detect malingering (disadvantage= limited generalizability)
  2. known group design: compare genuine patients with malingerers, analyze differences (difficulty with reliable and accurate classification of criterion group- used rarely)
52
Q

instrumental psychosis

A

identify patients attempting to fake symptoms to secure special accommodations

53
Q

how might someone tell if patient is malingering psychosis?

A
  • overreact
  • wiling to discuss symptoms
  • more likely to report positive symptoms
  • understandable motive for committing crimes
  • suspicious hallucinations and delusions
  • difference between interview and non-interview behavior
  • sudden emergence of symptoms that explain crime
  • no subtle sign of psychosis
54
Q

assessment methods for malingering psychosis

A
  1. interview based method (SIRS)

2. Self-report questionnaires (MMIP-2):questions designed to detect ‘faking bad’