Test 3 Flashcards
In order to know what a language impairment (LI) is…
- WE need to know what id typical for..
- Typical characteristics of Second language..
- We need to know what is typical for ELLs who are developing English
- Many times, typical characteristics of second language acquisition and bilingualism are mistaken for symptoms of LI
TYPICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BILINGUALISM AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION:
- Language Loss
- Interference/Transfer
- Silent period
- Interlanguage
- Codeswitching
- Avoidance
- Formulaic Language
Language loss:
- Many ELL students’L1 is not ..
- unfortunately->
- Thus..
- Many ELL students’ L1 is not maintained in school through bilingual education
- Unfortunately→ language loss in L1
- Thus, low test scores in both L1 and English
Interference/transfer:
- What is it?
- For Example:
- If a Spanish speaking child pointed to a picture and said…
- When students are learning an L2, they make errors that reflect the influence of L1
- For example: in Spanish, a child would say “la casa verde” (the house green)
- If a Spanish-speaking child pointed to a picture and said, “look—I see the house green” (instead of “I see the green house”) this would be transfer from Spanish, not a sign of a clinically significant problem with syntax
Transfer:
-Errors of transfer from L1 are…
- syntax, morphology, phonology, semantics, pragmatics
- Errors of transfer from L1 are NOT signs of a communication disorder—just a difference
Silent Period:
- What is it?
- The younger the student..
- Students introduced to L2 during the preschool years may..
- In the early stages of learning an L2, most students focus on comprehension and do very little speaking
- The younger the student, the longer the silent period usually lasts
- Students introduced to L2 during the preschool years may speak very little in L1 or in L2 for more than one year
Interlanguage:
- What is it?
- Student is..
- What are inconsistent?
- System that has structurally intermediate status between L1 and L2
- Student is approximating L2
- Errors are inconsistent
Codeswitching:
- What is it?
- Who commonly uses this strategy?
- What kind of a communication behavior?
- Alternating between 2 languages within a single phrase, sentence, or discourse
- Bilingual children commonly use this strategy
- Normal communication behavior
Codeswitching is used by..
multilingual adults and children around the world
Avoidance:
- What is it?
- They may be..
- Students will avoid communicating in L2 for fear of being laughed at or made fun of
- They may be self-conscious about their accent, use of English grammatical structures, and people asking “Where are you from?” (especially older learners)
Formulaic Language:
-Children use this to give impression that they speak the L2 well-increase opportunities to converse in L2
Sociocultural variables:
- S:
- C:
A. Socioeconomic status —low-income children have difficulty with knowledge-based tests
B. Cultural styles—e.g. reduced eye contact with adults, being silent in the presence of an adult
Impact of Affective Variables in Second Language Acquisition:
- M
- P
- Name the third one:
A. Motivation— instrumental vs. integrative
-Instrumental:
-just learning for a specific purpose
-learn slower
-Integrative:
-motivated to integrate with the mainstream culture
-they learn faster (Dixon & Zhao, 2017)
B. Personality-is child introverted or extroverted
C. Self-esteem
The Impact of Simultaneous and Sequential Bilingual Acquisition:
- Simultaneous:
- Interference between..
- Simultaneous: child is exposed to 2 languages from infancy in natural situations
- Interference between L1 and L2 is minimal
Early infancy is the..
ideal time for a child to be exposed to 2+ languages
Sequential acquisition:
- What is it?
- Sequential learners..
- Child is exposed to L1 during infancy, learns L2 at a later time
- Sequential learners–↑ diversity in rates and stages of acquisition
- If L2 is introduced sequentially before a strong L1 foundation has been established…
- These students..
- Preschool children who..
- If L2 is introduced sequentially before a strong L1 foundation has been established (e.g., 6-8 years of age), L1 development may be arrested or even regress while L2 is being learned
- These students, for a while, achieve low test scores in both L1 and L2—this can cause them to appear LI when they are not
- Preschool children who learn English in a sequential manner are especially vulnerable to this situation
4 Stages of Second Language Acquisition in Sequential Learners:
- Preproduction
- Early Production
- Speech Emergence
- Intermediate Fluency
Stage 1 (SLASL)
—preproduction:
10 hours-6 months English exposure
Beginning to comprehend-silent period
Beginning to communicate-gestures, body language, pointing
Stage 2(SLASL)
—early production:
- 6 months-1 year English
- 1-2 word verbal responses
- Answers simple yes-no, wh-questions
- Uses routines and formulas
Stage 3 (SLASL)
- Speech Emergence
- 1-3 yrs English exposure
- Using phrases and sentences
- Answers “why” and “how” questions
- Understands a lot, expresses effectively in simple sentences; some grammatical errors
Stage 4 (SLASL)
- Intermediate Fluency
- 3-4 years exposure to English
- Beginning to develop solid academic English
- Engages in extended discourse
- Writes essays, critiques and analyzes information
Separate vs. Common Underlying Proficiency:
- SUP:
- Believers of SUP try to..
- The Separate Underlying Proficiency (SUP) model holds that L1 and L2 proficiencies are totally separate, and building skills in one language will not help the other language
- Believers of SUP try to eradicate students’ L1 through placing these students in “sink or swim” all-English classrooms and telling parents to “speak only English at home”
Cummins promoted the CUP model, which states:
“…the literacy-related aspects of a bilingual’s proficiency in L1 and L2 are seen as common or interdependent across languages… experience with either language can promote development of the proficiency underlying both languages, given adequate motivation and exposure to both either in school or in the wider environment”
According to the theory of Common Underlying Proficiency…
- Building up..
- Parents need to..
- Building up one language positively affects the development of the other language
- Parents need to speak to their child in the language in which they are most comfortable
Practical Implications of CUP:
- Build up L1 skills
- The stronger the students L1 foundation, the more easily she will learn concepts in English
- Additive bilingualism-> academic success!
Often older learners with a solid L1 foundation perform quite well academically because..
Because their solid L1 foundation supports the learning of English and academic content
Unfortunately, many of our ELL students experience limited bilingualism
- These students do not..
- These students experience..
- They can appear to be..
- These students do not receive L1 support, and they try to learn L2 (English) with a foundation that is not fully developed
- These students experience negative cognitive effects and frequent academic failure
- They can appear to be “language impaired,” when in reality, they are merely not strong in either L1 or English
CILF and FALF (*based on the work of Jim Cummins)
- We can distinguish..
- When conducting assessments of ELLs for the possible presence of a LI, what is it important to understand?
- We can distinguish between two types of language fluency
- When conducting assessments of ELLs for the possible presence of a language impairment, it is extremely important to understand
a) what type of language proficiency we are assessing, and
b) if our expectations are reasonable given the student’s length of exposure to English
Conversational Informal Language Fluency (CILF):
- “picked up” quickly and easily from environment
- Oral language fluency-facilitates social interaction in daily life
- Context-embedded, shared reality between speakers
- There is contextual support for the interaction
FALF (Formal Academic Language Fluency):
- Oral and written language
- Gained through formal schooling
- Taught explicitly in academic settings
- Little context or shared reality between communicators
- Abstract- formal communication contexts
For some ELLs…
- FALF takes much…
- If an ELL is proficient and…
- If an ELL is from a low-income background..
- FALF takes much longer to develop than CILF
- If an ELL is proficient and literate in her first language, FALF can develop more quickly
- However, if an ELL is from a low-income background and has no literacy skills in the first language, there can be a gap between CILF and FALF development—CILF develops much faster
In these cases, when we extrapolate from CILF to FALF…
- Create deficits in..
- Students with adequate CILF…
- Create deficits in students-may be erroneously identified as LI
- Students with adequate CILF may still need more time to develop FALF
Many English language proficiency tests assess just CILF
- A problem with this is that..
- These can include..
- The gap between the students..
- A problem with this is that when a CILF-oriented proficiency test labels an ELL student as “Fully English Proficient,” professionals assume the student is ready to handle FALF-oriented tests in English
- These can include statewide school achievement tests, speech-language and psychological tests, etc.
- The gap between the student’s CILF and FALF performance may lead to erroneous special education placement.
BILINGUAL EDUCATION AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS:
- American..
- Monolingual norm..
- American attitudes
- Monolingual norm assumption/limited capacity hypothesis
- Most students in Europe..
- Our 16 year old Ukranian
- Most students in Europe begin compulsory foreign lang instruction before age 10
- Our 16-year old Ukrainian exchange student, Miya, speaks English, Russian, Ukrainian, and French
Diagnostic Pie
- What is language a system of? What is it used to represent?
- What might students experiences differ from?
- If teachers refer ELL students for testing…
- LI=
- Language is a system of symbols used to represent concepts formed through exposure and experience
- Students’ experiences may differ from mainstream school expectations
- If teachers refer ELL students for testing, there may be a difference, not disorder, because of experiential differences
- LI=disorder in both L1 and English!!
4 quadrants in the “Diagnostic Pie” (p. 248)
-Quadrant 1==normal ability, adequate background
-Quadrant 2==normal ability, limitations of linguistic experience, environmental exposure
-Quadrant 3==LI, adequate background
-Quadrant 4==LI, limitations of linguistic experience, environmental exposure
(BE FAMILIAR, not see kids w/ quadrant 1&2)
Dr. Ron Gillam (CSHA)
- What are we way overidentifying?
- Assessed Spanish speaking..
- Of 167…
- We are WAAY overidentifying ELL kindergarteners for IEPs
- Assessed Spanish-speaking Ks at beginning and end of K (English & Spanish)
- Of 167 “at risk” at beginning of K, only 21 really needed IEPs at end of K
Indicators of LI
- How do they learn compared to similar peers?
- communication problems..
- Slower..
- Need for lots of..
- What kind of problems in L1?
- Delayed..
- Compared to SIMILAR PEERS, learn slowly in L1 and L2
- Communication problems at home and/or with similar peers
- Slower development than sibling (of same gender)
- Need for lots of prompting, repetition during instruction
- Pragmatic, syntactic, semantic problems in L1
- Delayed lang devt. Milestones in L1
LEGISLATION: IDEA 2004
- How must we evaluate?
- Tests must be administered..
- Testing cannot reflect…
- We must evaluate in a nondiscriminatory manner
- Tests must be administered in most proficient communication mode
- Testing cannot reflect limited English; must reflect child’s ability in area tested
- The IDEA does not require..
- Many special educators have used..
- the law does not exclude..
- it leaves the choice of..
- The IDEA does not require that standardized measures are used**
- Traditionally, many special educators have used standardized tests because they believe that a quantitative score is mandated by federal law; however, the law does not exclude subjective or qualitative measures. It leaves the choice of measurement tools and criteria to the educator.
IDEA, 2004:
- What is eliminated?
- What do you increase focus on?
- need for IQ performance discrepancy eliminated
- Increase focus on early intervention
IDEA (2004)
-Does not specify use of..
-Says: use a..
Determination of disability should..
- does not specify use of either formal or informal tools for assessment.
- Says: use a variety of assessment tools, and that determination of disability should not rely on a single test or measure.
PRE-EVALUATION PROCESS
- Before doing formal testing..
- What are the three things that are carried out?
- Before doing formal testing, it is extremely important to carry out the following:
1. Language proficiency testing
2. Ethnographic interviewing and case history
3. Teacher evaluation of student’s classroom performance
Language Proficiency Testing
- Primary Language
- Dominant Language
- Who do we interview?
- Primary language? (language they learned first)
- Dominant language? (the lang she most fluent in today)
- Interview parents, teachers, interpreters who have worked with the student
Language Proficiency
- California->
- Use..
- Ask re:
- California -> CELDT (California English language development test)
- Use language measures
- Ask re: oral and written skills in both langs
Be careful of the label “English Proficient”
- Usually means..
- Children may still not be..
- Usually means adequate ORAL English skills (CILF)
- However, ch still may not be able to read, write adequately in English and take standardized tests competently (FALF)
TESTING IN THE PRIMARY LANGUAGE
- Problem: great..
- Problem: Limited..
- Problem: differences in..
- Problem: great heterogeneity within languages (dialects)
- Problem: Limited data on normal development in other languages
- Problem: Differences in vocabulary and linguistic knowledge bases of students who immigrate vs. those born and raised in U.S.
Testing in the Primary Language
- Spanish versions of most..
- Many normed on..
- Spanish versions of most tests fail to consider dialectal differences
- Many normed on monolingual Spanish speaking ch
NEVER Translate an English test into the child’s L1 and use the norms:
- Normative data is..
- ELL student has..
- Some items are..
- Normative data is invalid
- ELL student has different background experiences than norming sample
- Some items are not directly translatable
SELECTING ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS
A,B,C,D,E,F
A. Appropriateness of Test Content B. Adequacy of norms C. Possible Examiner Bias D. Possible Situational Bias E. Possible Format Bias (types of test items) F. Possible Value Bias
A. Appropriateness of Test Content
*Many potentially unfamiliar items
D. Possible Situational Bias
-Ways of..
-Children may have a…
Some children come from..
- Ways of communication differ
- Ch may have a way of communicating that is different from mainstream norms (e.g., don’t look adult in the eye, do initiate conversation)
- Some ch come from backgrounds where verbal elaboration is not encouraged
E. Possible Format Bias
- Some children at home are..
- African American mothers..
- ELL children may have differences in..
- For examples,
- Some ch, at home, are rarely asked known-information questions (e.g., about pictures that both speaker and listener can see)
- Anderson-yockel & Haynes: African American mothers asked their ch fewer yes-no and wh- questions during a reading task than white mothers
- ELL ch may have differences in socialization practices or early literacy experiences
- For examples, labeling or pointing to objects may not be a typical experiences for Hispanic ch
F. Possible Value Bias
- Example: Test of..
- Preschool Language Scale
- Example: Test of Problem-Solving Skills-Revised—”What should she do now?”
- Preschool Language Scale—”Why do you brush your teeth?” African American children in some communities “Because my momma told me to.” (scored as incorrect; correct answer is “because you get cavities if you don’t”)
VII. NONBIASED ASSESSMENT: CONSIDERATIONS IN STANDARDIZED TESTING
Introduction
-What kind of tests are used with ELL students?
-Many SLP’s and other special educators..
-The IDEA permits the use of..
- Standardized, formal tests are commonly used with ELL students
- Many speech-language pathologists and other special educators operate from the belief that we must always obtain quantitative data such as percentile ranks and standard deviations
- However, the IDEA permits the use of qualitative, subjective measures which we will discuss more in the next section
The Native Americans have a saying..
The Native Americans have a saying: When you are riding a horse and it dies, dismount–and find a new one. But many of us keep wanting to revive the old horse of standardized testing with ELL students.
Nonbiased assessment:
B: Pitfalls of using Standardized Tests with ELL Students—Formal Test Assumptions
-There are very few..
-Most Standardized tests are..
- There are very few standardized tests in most languages
- Most standardized tests are developed from a Western, literate, middle class framework
These tests assume that students will:
- Cooperate to..
- Attempt to..
- Understand and successfully..
- Cooperate to the best of their ability
- Attempt to respond even when test tasks don’t make sense
- Understand and successful perform artificial, potentially unfamiliar tasks such as fill-in-the-blanks
They also assume that students will:
- Have been exposed..
- Be comfortable with..
- Be proficient in..
- Have been exposed to info and experiences assumed by test
- Be comfortable with an unfamiliar adult and willing to talk with him or her readily
- Be proficient in verbal display of knowledge
Bias in Standardized Testing: Potentially Unfamiliar Items
- Household objects
- Vehicles
- Sports
- Musical instruments
- Types of clothing
- Professions/occupations
- Historically related events and people
- Foods
- American nursery rhymes
- Geography
- Games
An ELL student may not recognize…
things like American fruits and vegetables
In many countries, soccer is called..
football
Holidays and seasons differ from..
country to country