Test 3 Flashcards
Three premises of Symbolic Interactionism
Meaning, Language, Thought
Meaning
premise 1, act towards things based on the meanings they ascribe to them
Language
Premise 2, meaning is derived from social interaction (symbols)
Thought
Premise 3, meanings are modified through interpretive process, based on language
Meads Self
I is unsocialized self while Me is socialized self
Meads 3 stages of role taking
Imitation, Play (acting as other would), Game (many roles at once)
Social Roles
Social positions defined by behavior, learned from significant others
Role taking
Taking perspective of others
Symbols
Arbitrary, conventional, meaningful, significant
Typified
Categorize the unfamiliar.
Idealized
Assume that if changed places, each would experience same reality
Wilson Reading
wolf controversy driven by 1. differential access to social power 2. conflicting ideas about private prop. 3. Divergent beliefs about nature Extra: Wolves are symbolic
Amenity Development
Krannich and Petrzelka 2004
1970-1996, areas with high Amenity grew much faster than low, mostly positive economics for the cities while it hurt low wage earners. Hurts environment with increased people
Tourism Use
recreation highly concentrated, use vs. impacts
Inflection point (Tourism Use)
substantial impacts have already occurred so further damage decreases
Whistler, B.C.
1964- no sewer, road, electricity
2007- 2 mill annual visitors
Aldo Leopold
Green fire in wolf eyes
Concerns of ranchers
Lossing cattle and living cattle were down on weight
Framing
Focusing the world around us by making elements essential or background
Assembling the claim
Identify goals, symbols, method to communicate
Presenting the claim
Animating the problem, legitimizing
Contesting the claim
demonstrating the problem
ESA
protect and recover imperiled species
Trophic Cascade
Wolf reintroduction led to rebalancing of dominance
2009
Wolves removed from ESA
Lecture Day 25
Many specific dates pertaining to wolfs
Final Exam
Similar to previous exams
Emphasize material since exam 2 (third case study)
Also include overall concepts (wicked problems, coupled human and natural systems, understanding human societies…three theoretical approaches)
Ecological Restoration
Return of ecosystem to approximation of its condition prior to disturbance
Reintroduction
introducing again, successfully brought in by humans in an area that was once part of their historic range
Wicked problem characteristics
radically different frames, problem never fully solved,
4 arguments in FWS delisting
- Human attitudes are a potential threat to wolves
- threat posed by human attitudes has lessened
- State Management of wolves will foster support
- Existing state regulatory mechanisms will balance negative attitudes
Freyfogle and Goble 2009
Determining status of endangered species requires answer to risk of extinction and if risk is acceptable
Resource Curve
wealth vs availability of Natural Resources, Countries with many resources underperform what they should be
Resource Curve Lessons
Abundance does not equal better life
Succesful management depends on social and global systems and connections
Kennedy and Thomas 1995
No universal laws or principles of ecology that establish value
Wicked Problem
Lots of variables, many connections, technically challenging, lack consensus, solutions good bad not true false
Grand Theory
Broad abstract ideas, global
Mid range theories
Framework of concepts to understand specific social phenomena
Case 1
Grand theory: Structural functionalism
Society is a system of interrelated parts
System components serve particular functions System organized to meet needs of whole
Structure: universal, persistent patterns of social relationships
Functions: contributions of social structures to maintain stability of society
Midrange Theory: Functionalism (Community, Culture, Economy, Polity & AGIL Model)
6 groups used this approach in Discussion Question 9, Conventions / Norms – the types / differences / how they manifest / ‘enforced’
Cognitive hierarchy (& component parts)
Property rights & public powers (e.g. takings, eminent
domain)
Endangered Species Act – what is its goal/objective, when it came about, what this means for citizens
Case 2
Grand theory: Conflict theory
Social systems are dominated by power
Those in power (minority) seek to maintain position by taking advantage of majority
Conflicts develop as oppressed act to take control (laborers rise up against those who control capital)
Midrange theory: Social dilemmas
Conflict between individual and collective
benefits/costs
8 groups used this approach, Prisoners’ Dilemma & Multiple person dilemmas
Tragedy of the Commons
Views of G. Hardin and E. Ostrom (& proposed ‘solutions’
Common Pool Resources
Property regimes (private property, open access,
common property, state managed)
Types of social dilemmas (traps & fences)
The ‘free rider’
Case 3
Grand theory: Symbolic interactionism
Humans act toward things on the basis of the meanings they
Meaning of such things is derived from, or arises out of, the social interaction that one has with others
Meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretative process used by the person in dealing with the things he/she encounters
Midrange theory: Social construction of nature
Groups in society ascribe meaning to natural resources,
environmental issues, etc.
Conflicts occur as the meanings differ between groups
5 groups used this approach, Grand Theory – Symbolic Interactionism Three basic premises
“Human beings act toward things on the basis of the meanings they ascribe to those things.”
“The meaning of such things is derived from, or arises out of, the social interaction that one has with others and the society.”
“These meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretative process used by the person in dealing with the things he/she encounters.”
Reality
Social objects & symbols Reading: Charon 1992
Plato’s Allegory of the Cave DVD: “Wolves in Paradise”
Reductionism
Attempt to understand complex systems through analyst of their components
CHANS
Couples Human And Natural Systems - Ecological systems can only be understood by examining their human and natural components