Test 2 Flashcards
Which important aspects of buying behaviour does the NBD-Dirichlet model describe?
How often people buy and which brands people choose
Where some brands share more (or less) customers with one another than what is expected (i.e. they deviate from the Duplication of Purchase Law), this is referred to as:
Partitioning
Which of the following is an incorrect assumption in relation to brand choice
All consumers have the same purchase propensities to buy particular brands
Bigger brands…
Have many more customers who are slightly more loyal
Which of the following is correct in relation to short-term memory
- Storage capacity is normally 5 to 9 items
- Can be enhanced by ‘chunking’
- Also referred to as the working memory
- Describe Category Entry Points (CEPs). List four examples of CEPs for the ice-cream category.
Category entry points are elements in out mental availability that can be distribution outlets and pathways to a brand in a buyers mind.
Examples:
- Need- If a person is hot, they will buy ice-cream to cool them down
- Who else is present- Children, Ice cream is a cheap reward
- The environment- Beach, one often associates an ice cream to be a good snack after a day at the beach
- Core benefit- It cools one down and gives a sugar rush
What is the “Natural Monopoly Effect”? Explain which brand performance metric shows the effect.
- A bigger brand will attach lighter category users in a high more often
- The loyalty metric shows the effect of the NME as it shows systematic variation in a category purchase rate
What is Mental Availability? Briefly describe how it relates to buying situations.
- Mental availability (Brand salience) is how much a brand is thought of when a consumer is making a purchase
- This relates as the mental availability reflects as to how many CEP’s a bran havs
The memory process involves 3 phases. Explain each phase.
- Encoding: information into storage
- Storage: where information is kept
- Retrieval: when provided with a cue we can retrieve linked information
- Explain the empirical generalisation Double Jeopardy?
- It is a pattern that has been observed
- Shows competing brands do not show much difference in regards to the frequencies of purchases in comparison to the substantial difference in the size of their customer base\