Test #2 Flashcards
Three threats to causal inference and how to control against each?
o Does cause precede effect?—Pre and post testing
o Relationship between DV & IV? –Comparing pre and post testing
o Third variable problem?—Post testing and random assignment
Classical experiment
Research design with 3 components- pre/post test, experimental/control groups and random assignment
quasi-experiment
- Research design that includes out, but not all, elements of an experimental design
- does not use random assignment
Experimental group
Subjects in experiment who receive the experimental treatment
double blind
Neither participants nor researcher know which group is experimental or control
Placebo
Drug administered that is not actually a drug to eliminate
Threats to internal validity (12)
- History
- Maturation
- Testing
- Instrumentation
- Statistical Regression
- Selection Bias
- Experimental Mortality
- Causal time order
- Diffusion of treatments
- Compensatory Treatment
- Compensatory Rivalry
- Demoralization
History
- External events can effect study results
- Ex. Terrorist attack, tsunami, death
Maturation
- People constantly growing
- Ex. young kids are deviant = mature and grow
Testing
- Process of testing & retesting
- ex. people change their answer to what they want to hear after seeing it already
Instrumentation
- Changes in measurement process
- ex. update survey and try and compare with old data using old surveys
Statistical regression
- Extreme scores regret to the mean
- ex. extreme scores will usually go back down to the mean
Selection bias
- Way in which subjects are chosen
- ex. people choose groups, experimenter selects place convenient for them
Experimental mortality
- when subjects drop out prior to experiment completion
Causal time order
- IV or DV come first, may only collect data at one time point
- Check which comes first
Diffusion of treatments
- Experimental group may pass on elements to control group, have contact w/ eachother
compensatory treatment
- control group deprived; researchers compensate
compensatory rivalry
- control group deprived; may compensate by working harder
Demoralization
- Feelings of deprivation among control group affect results at post-test
Non-equivalent groups design
- Select subjects in a way that makes the 2 groups as comparable as possible
time series deigns
- A type of quasi-experimental design where changes in a DV are monitored over some time period
Cohort design
- Group of subjects that enter or leave an institution at the same time
- ex. groups of people who graded in may
Case oriented research
- Many cases are examined to understand a small number of variables
variable-oriented research
- Large number of variables are studied for a small number of cases or subjects
Representative sampling
- All population members have known & = chance of being sampled
Probability Sampling
- Sampling in which the probability that en element will be included in a sample is known
Non-probability sampling
- Sampling which the probability that an element will be included in a sample is not known
Equal probability of selection method (EPSEM)
- representativeness achieved if sample charac. = population charac.
Standard error
- how far away we find scores device away from the mean
Confidence intervals
- how confident you will get results near the mean range
4 types of non-probability sampling
- Purposive/judgemental sampling
- Quota sampling
- Reliance on available subjects
- Snowball sampling
Purposive/judgemental sampling
- select a sample based on our own knowledge of the population, its elements, and the nature of our research aims
Quota sampling
- use matrix or table to describe the characteristics of the population we want to represent
Reliance on available subjects
stopping people on a street corner or other location