Test 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Community

A

A group of interacting populations of different species both within the same trophic level and from higher or lower levels with interaction outcomes often shaped by the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reciprocal

A

Feedbacks between species interactions and environmental conditions explain the dynamics of biological communities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Trophic Cascade

A

A series of indirect interactions in a food web that occur when a predator’s actions impact prey, which then impacts the prey’s prey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 6 essential components of competition

A
  1. Two or more organisms that require a single resource that is in short supply
  2. The supply of that resource must be affected by its use by the consumer
  3. The contest for that resource reduces the fitness of one or both competitors
  4. Competing organisms may be the same (infraspecific) different (interspecific)
  5. Explicitly tied to density-dependence - competition intensifies as density increases
  6. Organisms may compete by:
    - Exploitation
    - Interference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ecological Niche

A
  • How the environment limits the population
  • How the population affects the environment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Consumption Paradox

A

Resource use can drive both the growth and collapse of populations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dominance Disadvantages

A
  • The direct opposite of rarity advantages
  • Dominance associated with ecological success, but large “reproductively successful” populations may eventually experience the highest rates of mortality seen in the natural world
  • Frequency: species in a community
  • Density: Individuals in a population
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In modern agiculture, all farm management centers of overcoming…

A

Dominance disadvantages
- Fertilizer (nutrient limitation
- Irrigation (moisture limitation)
- Insecticide (enemy attack - across trophic levels
- Herbicide (invasion - within trophic levels)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Exploitation

A
  • indirect
  • mediated via a shared resource
  • No touch, no sight
  • Victory usually relative, not absolute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Interference

A
  • Direct
  • Direct aggressive interaction
  • One winner, one loser (absolute)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Exploitation Competition

A

Interact via impacts on the resource pool
- competitive effect
- competitive response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

___ select species have the highest fitness at the lowest level of resources

A

R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Global environmental change transforms…

A

The pool sizes and flow rates of limiting resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Principle of Competitive Exclusion

A

Two species with identical requirements for shared limiting resources cannot coexist

Options for the subordinate:
1. move
2. die
3. adjust (natural selection)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Latter Factor

A

Predicted to be a critical driving force in speciation and, therefore, coexistence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Gause (1920) Experiment and Assumption

A

Used a simple system with 2 yeast species and one limiting resource (controlled complexity

Assumption: Even among closely related species or individuals, one is always predicted to be the better competitor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Hutchinson (1961) Experiment

A

Paradox of Plankton

observed factors preventing the system from reaching equilibrium
- turbulence of the water
- predation
temperature inversions
- intraspecific competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

MacArther (1958) Experiment

A

Studied warblers

Assumption: identical needs, unlimited resource
- competitive exclusion wrong?

Method: Measured feeding positions within the tree
- Found species hardly interact because they make different livings of different parts of the tree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the ghost of competition past?

A

Competition is unimportant, but in the past it must have been extremely important - important but indirect
- Competition played out more powerfully in earlier years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The Paradox of Plant Coexistance

A
  • Most plants require common set of resources that include water, light, N, P, K and a dozen micronutrients
  • Plants are immobile
  • Interspecific competition for resources is the norm in plant communities, so how can so many plants coexist with one another
  • All plants fo the same things - so why so many species?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Silvertown (1999) Experiment

A

Problem: species rich plant communities are repositories of biodiversity and dwindling resources but how to they coexist?
- A plants require the same resources so there should be competitive exclusion

Method: Species tolerances were estimated from the range of hydrological conditions
- Each species occurred in a different location in the trade-off space between
1. drainage /soil aeration
2. dryness
- Every species occupies slightly different space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Lotka-Volterra Competition Model

A

Describes the competition between organisms are based on the logistic curve. Each of these two equations shows the effect of intra-specific (within a species) competition only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Generally the strength of ____ competition exceeds ____ competition

A

Intraspecific competition exceed interspecific competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the competition coefficient?

A

Converts species 2 individuals into an equivalent number of species a individuals

  • α, is the per capita competitive effect of species 2 on species 1
  • β, is the per capita competitive effect of species 1 on species 2

Competition coefficients show per capita competitive effect of each species on the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
2 "sources of slowing" for the growth of species 1
1. its own density 2. The density of the second species weighted by the second species relative impact
26
Darwin's Naturalization hypotheses - Strauss
Biological invasions should be influenced by the degree of similarity between exotic and native species 1. Novel genera would be more successful invading than genera with native representatives. Prediction: greater differences, less competition, more success 2. Invaders that are more closely related to natives should be more likely to succeed, owing to similarities based on common ancestry. Prediction: greater similarities, greater competition, less success Test: Match the ancestral elatedness of the invader with those in the native community Trait over-dispersion: The presence of greater variability than would be expected based on a random model Supports H1 (novel hypothesis), with species more distantly related to the native community are most likely to invade Why: Less competition = easier invasion
27
Succession
The directional replacement in community composition through time, initially in response to disturbance but then regulated by autogenic processes (species influencing other species, and themselves).
28
Novel Ecosystems
- Communities altered by humans; characterized by new combinations of species and environmental conditions Message: outcomes of successions are not always predictable - Especially in terms of species composition and species richness - Predictability declines as scale gets smaller
29
Disturbance
A major agent of natural selection Kills or damages, affecting fitness - Tolerance traits - Avoidance traits - Prevention traits Catastrophic: Where all species are eliminated Non-catastrophic: some species persist
30
Disturbance intensity
Not all disturbance are the same - Environmental Stochasticity - How predictable is the occurrence of disturbances - Intensity: Disturbance vary in their magnitude, duration, frequency, and interval
31
Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis
- Too much is too bad, too little is too bad - Predicts species diversity will be greatest when disturbances like fires, tornados, or hurricanes are of intermediate amount of time has passed after disturbance Predictability Matters - Anthropogenic change typically involves significant shifts in the intensity of disturbances, that are so frequent that they homogenize landscapes and thus highly predictable (lowering species diversity)
32
Succession follows the same rules as... (2)
1. Follows the same rules as the ecological niche and environmental carrying capacity. - Environment acting on species (disturbance) - Species acting on the environment (autogenic processes affecting resource supply) 2. Follows the same rules as diversity regulation, with the blending on Type I and Type II diversity regulation - Dispersal: who gets there first - Competition: how the early colonists affect those that follow
33
Inhibition Succession
Whatever shows up first stays - Ex. invasive “ice plant” colonizes disturbed coastal area of california. It has such high saline leaves that soil becomes too salty for anything else to grow.
34
Reid's Paradox
The oak, to gain its present most northerly position in Northern Britain after being driven out by the cold probably had to travel fully six hundred miles, and this without external aid would take something like a million years - Based on average dispersal distance (janzen-conell) - How did it travel so far in so little time
35
Jump Dispersal
- Rare long distance dispersal events, that tend to initiate primary succession - Colonization of Krakatoa - Empty space is quickly filled
36
Community-level processes that critical for population regulation are not necessarily deterministic and orderly but can unfold in a range of ways depending on:
1. How abiotic foctors shape the environment 2. How species shape the environment 3. Dispersal constraint on who get there first and in what abundance
37
What is the key problem when testing Reid's Paradox
Key problem: Rare events rarely seen or measured; requires indirect testing
38
King and Herstorm (1996) Experiment
Holocene tree migration from fossil pollen data - Spruce - Eastern north america - Date of first pollen appearance in lake sediments vs. closest previous appearance to the south Findings: 1. mean = -100 m/yr 2. Rare events > 1 km
39
Holland (1980) Experiment
- Northward expansion for forbs much slower than trees Hypothesis: unoccupied suitable (births>deaths) habitat remains Test: Transplant plant slow dispersers where they’re absent Outcome: 1. High success of transplants - growth and reproduction 2. 1000s of km2 of unoccupied by suitable habitat in northeastern North America for many species
40
Succession describes ___, not ___
Succession describes on-going transition, not progression towards a climax
41
Assembly is regulated by... (2)
1. Limiting environmental factors 2. Constraints on colonization
42
Inhibition Succession
Any species can potentially colonize an area (as long ad they can disperse there) but the early colonists modify the location making it unsuitable for species arriving later
43
Indirect Inhibition
Resource control (exploitation competition)
44
Direct Inhibition
Direct interaction (interference competition)
45
Multiple Stable States
There can be multiple endpoints of succession at a given location not just one deterministic outcome Shaped by Three Factors 1. Environmental Change 2. Species Impacts 3. Dispersal
46
What are the 2 Succession over-simplifications?
- Succession aways results in the same highly predictable outcome - Succession involves the orderly and highly predictable transition from one group of species ( r-type) to the next (K-type)
47
Stability
Lack of change over time
48
Resistance
Remaining unchanged following disturbance
49
Resilience
Returning to the reference state, after a temporary disturbance
50
Threshold (tipping point)
An abrupt change in the functioning of a community often brought about by environmental change or the arrival of new species
51
Hysteresis
Reversing the change may require different actions than what drove the change in the first place - Tough to go back to where you were
52
True/False: Food webs loose energy from one level to the next?
True
53
Carnivores
Kill prey during attack
54
Herbivores
Remove parts of many prey, rarely lethal
55
Parasites
Consume parts of one or few prey, rarely lethal
56
Parasitoides
Kill one prey during prolonged attack
57
What are the two forms of predators?
Specialist - Consumes only one prey type Generalist - Consumes many prey types
58
Predation-prey relationtionships are most often ____ relating to abiotic factors and feedbacks, thresholds, and indirect effects
non-linear
59
The linearity or non-linearity of predator-prey relationships derives from ____
population processes
60
Simple linearity
As the number of prey items increases, the number killed by the predator increases - Type I
61
Strength in Numbers
As the density of rodents increases, the percentage of the population killed by weasels declines in a curvilinear fashion - Type II
62
Satiation
As orey availability increases, the number of those found in the gut of the predator increases up to some threshold - Type II
63
Type III
As a previously rare prey species increases, predators slowly increase their consumption with prey density,
64
Paradox of enrichment
When more resources lead to less species and less production. - Initial growth then crash
65
Optimal Foraging Theory
Time spent foraging must be balances against other facests of growth and survival
66
What are the 4 prey quality variabilities
1. Ease of capture 2. Handling time 3. Frequency within the prey population 4. Energy pay-off
67
Marginal Value Theory
Describes strategy that maximizes gain per unit time in systems where resources decrease with time
68
Why are aquatic food pyramids often inverted?
- Driven by the growth rate, size and nutritional quality of produces - Aquatic primary producers achieve faster growth rates and are more nutritious