TEST 2 Flashcards
police demands + requirements
- MULTIPLE / DIVERSE TASKS
- KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW / ACT LAWFULLY
- PROMOTE A POSITIVE IMAGE
- BEUREAUCRATIC / PERSONAL STRESS
CLUSTER 1
§ Physical courage
§ Self-assertiveness
§ Pragmatism
§ Mission
§ Action
□ A group of people who need to take action
□ Training, responsibility, and authority to intervene
CLUSTER 2
○ Suspicion
○ Cynicism
○ Pessimism
○ Scretuveness
○ Loyalty
○ Solidarity
□ A tendency for police for them to feel like they’re in a close knit group that shares a common identity; a bond only they understand
□ Can cause feelings of isolation, judgment, misunderstanding, and/or fear
□ Overexposure to criminals (constantly seeing the worst part of humanity)
□ View of male offenders is more negative than the general population
□ Overall antisocial view of the world
□ In group and outgroup views to be sharpened
CLUSTER 3
§ Conservatism
□
§ Authoritarianism
□ Scale/concept that emerged trying to understand WW2; how people embraced the Nazi party
□ Value hierarchical dominance
® Lower on the hierarchy = role is to be obedient and submit
* Prejudice
□ Not everyone sees everyone as an equal
□ Easy to have prejudice and discriminate against outgroups (conventions and environment of the job)
® Police treat people with different statuses differently
□ Stereotypes
® Eg. female police officers
VALUES IN A POLICE CAREER
- Preference for order and security (power, security, conformity, traditionalism)
- Desire to provide social services to others (benevolence)
- A job that allows independent thought and creativity (Lurigio & Skogan, 1994)(stimulation and self-direction)
HUNTING
Taking information and narrowing your focus
TRACKERS
find the physical evidence the animal has left behind (footprint)
LAY PSYCHOLOGY
- Ex: research on impression formation
- Before we even meet someone new, we will make our own clues to tell us qualities about them to tell ourselves what kind of person we are meeting
- Rudimentary impression (what they’re wearing, what context we observing them, what expressions, how they look)
- Create an expectation of what someone is like based on our understanding of the messages we gathered from our beliefs (ex: what’s your previous experience w ppl that dress similarly)
- Happens unconsciously
CRIMINOLOGICAL TYPING; LOMBROSO
- White collar crimes vs violent offences based on your eyebrows
- High brow vs low brow
- Been debunked, but it made sense on terms of narrowing the field down for ppl with certain brows to then find out what type of criminal they are
PSYCHOANALYSIS; BRUSSEL
- Idea we need to come up with a reason on what’s motivating someone
- Produced accurate profile of the mag bomber
- “police should be looking for someone w female relatives”
- He looked at hand written notes made by the mag bomber and discovered his w’s looked like breasts (representing female influence)
EMPIRICISTS PERSPECTIVE
- Lets collect more data on more characteristics to help link certain characteristics w certain offender behaviour
- Helps us know where to look
CORE ASSUMPTION #1
- Criminal behaviour is subject to the same set of grand laws of human behaviour to which noncriminal behaviour is subject
- the motives, the process associ w criminal behaviour are the same motives processes motivated w non criminal behaviour
- There’s nothing special about it, no different psychological processes
- Ppl engage in behaviour that they think is rewarding, whether that be sitting in a classroom or killing someone, its still rewarding
CORE ASSUMPTION #1 EQUATION
B= f (P, E), WHERE E= (V+C)
B= offender behaviour, function of
P= offender characteristics (level of rage, anxiety, impulse)
(person)
E= environment (= to some unspecified combo of the victim and the context)
V= victim
C= context
Lets us know the pieces of the puzzle
GOAL OF PROLFING:
- To solve for P
CORE ASSUMPTION #2
- “profiling is a psychological (attributional task)
EQUATION FOR CORE ASSUMPTION #2
- WHAT
- WHEN
- WHERE (PHYSICAL EVIDENCE). —>
HOW (EVENT RECONSTRUCTION, WHAT ACC HAPPENED) —>
WHY (BEHAVIOURS, INTENTIONS, CHARACTERISTICS) —>
WHO? = PROFILE
THE PROBLEM OF DISTORTION
Evidence collection (if distortion happens here, then everything else will be wrong too)
- Possible to misinterpret the physical evidence
- Ex: remains found in desert locations
- Looks like they died from blood forced trauma due to broken ribs, bones
- Further observation; vultures would come stand on the deceased, bones got weaker and broke
- If you got that wrong, you’re going in a whole different direction
- Another ex: contaminating the crime scene
CORE PROFILING TASKS
- MODUS OPERANDI
- PERSONATION/ SIGNATURE (THE STYLE)
- STAGING
- DURESS
- HABIT
CORE PROFILE CHALLENGES
- offenders lie
- caught vs not caught (only info from caught)
- validating victimology of the dead (not here to give their side)
- trad research goal vs profiling goal (characteristics of person, prob. because of human range)
- profilers refuse to participate in profilers in case they get it wrong
(egos, distrust, hype, ignorance)
SOURCES OF INVESTIGATOR BIAS
- Personality characteristics (ex cop culture)
- If you have a certain set of expectations, they will bias you
- Values and general worldview
- (you can bring that into an interview)
- Prejudices and stereotypes (ex racial profiling)
- Dividing the world into groups
- Take those groups and turn them into ingroups or outgroups
- Specific prior expectations (ex other witness accounts, similar past cases)
- Expectations can come from someone else who already viewed the situation
- An anqor (first piece of info) that you then deviate from
- “anqour on the first piece, this will influence the rest of your judgements”
PROBLEMATIC INTERVIEWING TECHNIQUES
- leading questions
- reinforcing expectations, giving verbal/nonverbal clues
- ignoring/disconfirming unwanted answer
- heavy pressure tactics
SOURCES OF INTERVIEWEE BIAS
- memory accuracy
- personality characteristics
- voluntary deception (lying)
LEAKAGE HYPOTHESIS
- There are detectable differences that distinguish lying from truth telling
- “people leak that they are not being truthful”
MAJOR INDICATORS OF LYING EMERGE BECAUSE LYING IS
A) STRESSFUL AND
B) REQUIRES MORE COGNITIVE RESOURCES
5 WAYS TO PUT INNOCENT PPL AT RISK
- “I don’t interrogate innocent people”
- waive rights, innocent don’t believe they need protection
- Higher pressure interrogation if denying guilt
- use questionable interrogation techniques
- “id know a false confession if I saw one”