Test 1 Flashcards
Why isn’t introspection sufficient? Reason 1
- Vision is effortless
- Memory is a slightly blurred replica of of the past
- Humans think logically owing to language and consciousness
Titchener’s instrospection
Use the first word that comes to mind
Potter: vision is efficient
Simons: vision is coarse
Both were right
Potter: RSVP results replicate, gist comprehension is fast
Simons: change blindness replicable, visual details are hard to retain
Gist vs detail
to humans: comprehending first is easier than remembering visual details
to computers: perhaps the opposite is terue
Why isn’t introspection sufficient? Reason 2
- disagreements between different individuals, regarding different aspects of mental capacity: visual perception of gist vs. detail
- many though processes occur outside of conscious awareness: neglect patients
- conscious introspection can be misleading: split brain patient
Visual Neglect
neglects left side of space
- copy right half of a figure
- eat the right side of her plate
Split brain patient
Left side controls speech
- Severing the connection between the two hemisphere can relieve severe epilepsy in some patients
- Right demands go to the left hemisphere: patients can answer why they stood up
- Left demands go to the right hemisphere: patient have no access to answer why
The Garcia Effect
Unique solutions are reached only by adding assumptions
- Assumptions are often but not always, correct
- Rats solved this problem by adding assumptions about how the world works
- Stomach illness: taste, not environment
- Physical pain: environment, not taste
Deduction
Begins with a general statement and tries to figure out specific claims that follow from it
- all gorillas are apes - all apes are mammals - all gorillas are mammals
T or F: deduction is syntactic
True
Inductions
Begins with specific facts or observation s and then draws general conclusion from them
- 99 swans have been observed and all of them are white
- All swans are white - false there are black swans
T or F: induction is syntactic
True
What are the 3 assumptions to children’s word learning?
- Taxonomic assumption
- Mutual exclusivity assumption
- Whole object assumption
Taxonomic assumption
Children will extend a new label to something of the same kind rather than to something which is thematically related to the know object
- Same “kind” of object, not same “theme”
Mutual Exclusivity Assumption
Word names are mutually exclusive
- Show the child an apple and an unknown apple
- Experimenter would ask hand me the “mafer”
- The children would hand the experimenter the unknown object
Whole Object Assumption
A novel label is associated with an entire object rather than a part of that object
Fodor’s criteria for modules
- Domain specificity
- Innately specified
- Hardwire
- informational encapsulation
- mandatory
Domain Specificity (Fodor’s criteria)
a module only processes a certain kind of information - frog's bug detector
Innately Specified (Fodor’s criteria)
Genetically determined, not learned
Hardwired (Fodor’s criteria)
Part of the brain is specially designed for this function
Informational Encapculation (Fodor’s criteria)
Only receives input form certain other modules
- knowledge cannot overcome visual illusions
Mandatory (Fodor’s criteria)
works automatically
- e.g. word meaning is processed automatically
- say the color of the word instead of the name of the color
What are the characteristics for Fodor’s criteria
- Fast and efficient
- Automatic
- Critical for survival
What is the consequence of attending to some stimuli and ignoring others?
Attention can change psychological experience even though stimuli remain the same
Neissier 1979
Videotaped 2 groups of people (in white and black shirts) playing basketball
Inattentional blindness
suggests that unless we pay close attention, we can miss even the most conspicuous events.
Dichotic listening
Used to investigate selective attention within the auditory system
- selective listening is easy
what was noticed during dichotic listening
sound is presented; gender of the speaker; speech changed to tones
what was failed to notice during dichotic listening?
English to German; English speech presented backwards; same word list repeated 35 times
T of F paying attention is a matter of sight and blindness
true
Haines 1991 (Attention and perception)
- Projected flight console info on the cockpit windshield
- 50% of pilots tried to land the plane when the runway was obstructed by another plane
T or F: attention gates conscious memory
True
Rock & Gutman 1981 (attention and memory)
Make aesthetic judgment on red shape
- Surprise memory test
~ Can sort attended shapes from new or__
~Cannot distinguish unattended shape from new ones
T or F: attention modulates brain activity
True
Wojciulike et al. 1998 (attention and brain activity)
In different blocks , attend to faces (F), houses (H), or the color of the cross (C)
- Task: same or different?
- There is a higher activity when faces are attended
Own name effect
subject’s own name is sometimes noticed though unattended
- heard their name through the unattended ear
- not reliable if subjects were on the lookout for new instructions, 80% noticed “you may stop now”
T or F: in late selection it is often possible to show that some semantic processing of ignored stimuli still occurs
true
Early selection model
Attention filters out on the basis of physical features
- When people focus on certain stimuli and ignore others, they generally notice only relatively gross physical properties of the ignored stimuli
late selection model
Attention filters only after meaning is analyzed
- It is often possible to show that some semantic processing of ignored stimuli still occurs