Terms Express And Implied Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Condition

A

Central to contract - can allow contract to be repudiated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Poussard v spiers and pond

A

Lead actress failed to attend
Condition in contract so could be repudiated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Warranty

A

Minor term - only damages can be claimed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bettini v gye

A

Singer didn’t show up to rehearsal
Breach of warranty - awarded damages for loss of earnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Innominate term

A

Not clear condition or warranty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hong Kong for shipping co. Ltd v Kawasaki

A
  • ship not suited for ordinary cargo service
  • introduced innominate terms - category between warranty and conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Oscar chess v Williams

A

Date of car model not in contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

couchman v hill

A

catalogue said heifer unserved - was pregnant
taken as contract term rather than representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dick Bentley v Harold smith motors

A

Said Car 20,000 miles v 100,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Routledge v mackay

A

7 day time lag

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Moorcock

A

Safe mooring and not damaged implied term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Shaewel v reade

A

Horse for stud purposes - implied term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Shell uk ltd v lostock garage ltd

A

Officious bystander test
Only sell to shell, prices so low make loss - never would’ve agreed to deal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Egan v static control components

A

Reasonable person assume guarantee apply to existing and future debts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

M&S plc v BNP Parius security services trust companies

A

Notionable reasonable people in positions of people in time of contracting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hutton v warren

A

Local custom entitled for seed + labour at end of agricultural lease

16
Q

Hillias v arcos

A

Vague option clause - implied same terms as previous contract

17
Q

Importance attached to representation

A

Couchman v hill

18
Q

Special knowledge or skill of person making statement

A

Oscar chess v Williams - date of car model
Dick Bentley v Harold smith motors - car miles

19
Q

Time lag between statement and contract

A

Routledge v mackay - 7 day

20
Q

Terms implied by common law or statute

A

Sale of goods act 1979
Sale of goods and services 1982
CRA 2015

21
Q

Business efficacy

A

Moorcock - safe mooring implied
Scrawel v reade - horse stud

22
Q

Officious bystander

A

Shell uk ltd v lostrock garage Ltd - only sell shell
Egan v static control components - reasonable persons assume guarantee applied
M&S plc v BNP parions security services trust companies - notional reasonable people in position of parties at time

23
Q

Term implied by custom

A

Hutton v warren - local custom entitled to allowance for seen + labour end of agricultural lease

24
Q

Term implied by prior dealings

A

Hillias v arcos - vague option clause - implied on same terms as previous contract