Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

(WED) Contract Law > Ex 1 > Flashcards

Ex 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

L’Estrange y Graucob case significance

A

Excludes conditions and warranties; not work; bound.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Chapeltan u Barry Urban District Council case significance

A

Ticker no receipt; unreasonable; liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Thompson v London Midland + Scottish Railway Co. case significance

A

Miterate; exclusions; not alter legal position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Curtis v Chemical Cleaning + Dyeing Co. Ltd case significance

A

Sign exclusion; beads/sequins; stain; wedding dress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Olley u Marborough Court Hotel case significance

A

Imply terms previously dealt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

McCuthean v David MacBrayne Ltd case significance

A

Sign sometimes; no consistent course of action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Thornton u Shoe Lane Parking case significance

A

Conditions exclusions inside; not in contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Transocean Drilling une la v Erovidence Resources Ltd case significance

A

Contra proferentum not used when words clear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hollier v rambler motors

A

Imply terms previously dealt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly

(WED) Contract Law (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions