Term 2 Lecture 6: Protein Structure And Function Flashcards
Protein structure and function is regulated by:
pH, heat, ligands (small molecules)
Consecutive reactions
feedback pathways
chemical modification by other enzymes and interactions with other proteins
Physico chemical effects - pH and heat
Extremes of pH can denature proteins whilst small changes can regulate them
pH change affects charge on proteins/ ligands affecting ligand receptor interactions involving binding and catalysis
pH change can affect protein structure through effects of ionisation on as side chains
Function can change significantly due to denaturation e.g. in talin-actin binding protein involved in cell migration - changing pH affects ionisation of residues at top (pH sensor) causing confirmational changes to region at the bottom of the molecule affecting actin binding.
Small changes in pH affect biological molecules e.g. oxygen binding capacity of Hb
Oxygen binding by Hb is pH dependent
This allows more to be loaded in the lungs and unloaded in the tissues - because lower pH is more efficient for unloading (due to loss of cooperativity)
High pO2 is required for loading.
Charge-charge interaction on salt bridge in deoxy haemoglobin inhibits oxygen binding (changes confirmation to T favouring)
At higher pH (6.6) histidine side chains are not protonated so salt bridge is not present and oxygen can bind (T form not favoured so R form occurs)
CO2+H20<-> H2OCO3 <-> HCO3- + H+
Reaction between CO2 & H2O catalysed by carbonic anhydrase, decrease in pH caused by dissociation of carbonic acid decreases affinity of Hb for O causing T form to be favoured
O2 binding by Hb in lung/ in tissues
Lung/tissues
High O2/ low O2
Low CO2/ high CO2
Rel high pH/ rel low pH
R form favoured/ T form favoured
O2 bonds efficiently/released efficiently
Low levels of 2,3 DPG/ high levels
Hb not carbalymated/ Hb carbalymated
pH affects enzymes and substrates
pH affects enzyme activity (Vmax) usually as a bell shaped curve with maximum as optimum pH
pH also affects substrate which can be part of what determines optimum pH
Stomach enzymes work best at low pH while intestine enzymes work best at slightly alkali pH (in humans)
Effect of temperature on enzyme activity
Activity increases until the protein is denatured
Extremophiles such as thermophilic bacteria have very high optimum temp. E.g. 100⁰C and stable to >110⁰C for a short time. They are useful in industry e.g. Thermus aquaticus is the thermophilic bacteria from which Taq poly used in PCR was isolated.
Regulation of protein binding by reversibly bound small molecules (ligands)
Binding of O to Hb is modulated by small molecule 2,3 biphosphoglycerate (2,3 BPG) an intermediate from the glycolytic pathway
2,3 BPG binds in central cavity of the Hb tetramer held by pos charged hist and lys side chains
2,3 BPG decreases affinity of Hb for O2 it preferentially binds to deoxy Hb stabilising T state (decreases affinity)
Intermediates in glycolytic pathway increase in level in cells under O2 limitation
High levels of 2,3 BPG in RBC under O2 stress aid O2 unloading where needed
Tissue under stress becomes acidified so this also has an effect.
Enzymes : reversible/irreversible inhibitors
Reversible
Non-cov e.g. those forming ES complex can dissociate, restoring activity, common in metabolic regulation.
These usually resemble enzyme substrate/coenzyme or other metabolic intermediate
Irreversible
Form a cov bond between inhibitor and enzyme via a chemical reaction - when inactivated this way an enzyme usually can’t regain function.
These inhibitors are less common in metabolic regulation.
E.g. iodoacetamide - modifies enzyme
Enzyme inhibition
Competitive:
Inhibitor binds to active site, prevents substrate from binding.
Can be countered by increasing conc. Of substrate to outcompete inhibitor.
The structure of the inhibitor is similar to that of the substrate
Non-competitive:
Inhibitor binds at a point that doesn’t prevent substrate binding. Binds to E & ES equally well. Effect cannot be countered by increase in substrate - effective for drugs.
Uncompetitive:
Affects substrate binding and turnover e.g. binds to an ES complex, when substrate binds to the enzyme it reveals a binding site for the inhibitor (induced fit)
Michaelis Menten Vs Lineweaver burke plot to observe inhibition type
Michaelis Menten plots of enzyme inhibition constant Ki. Inhibitors change Vmax and Km →”apparent” Vmax & Km
Lineweaver burke plots are more informative w/distinct change according to inhibitor type
Competitive inhibition:
Km increased, Vmax unaffected
Uncompetitive inhibition:
Km reduced, Vmax reduced
Non-competitive inhibition (mixed inhib):
Km unaffected, V max reduced
See calculations in molecules and cells notebook 2
Regulation by consecutive reaction/ feedback pathways
Basis of metabolism - coupling unfavourable w/favourable reactions
A favourable Gibbs free energy change (∆G <0) is exergonic
An unfavourable Gibbs free energy change (∆G >0) is endergonic
Endergonic & exergonic coupling is common in biochemistry
Two reactions can be directly coupled (same physical location, same time e.g. enzyme reaction) or indirectly coupled (energy from one reaction generates “potential energy” gradient which is used later in the system e.g. batteries.
Direct coupling reaction example
Reaction 1:
Glucose + Pi → Glucose 6 phosphate
(∆G1)
Reaction 2:
ATP→ADP+Pi
(∆G2)
Reaction 3
Glucose + ATP
→ Glucose 6 phosphate+ADP
(∆G3=∆G1+∆G2)
Reaction 1 is thermodynamically unfavourable requiring a POS free energy change (endergonic) so does not happen by itself.
An enzyme (hexokinase) couples reaction 1 with reaction 2 the hydrolysis of ATP to ADP+Pi a reaction with a very negative free energy change (exergonic.)
This makes reaction 3, outcome is the addition of energy changes from reaction 1 & 2 added together. The overall exergonic outcome is a favoured reaction
Consecutive coupling reaction example
Overall free energy change must be neg to be favourable.
In a multi step reaction with multiple barriers the slowest step has the largest barrier and is called the “rate limiting step’
Reaction profile for a simple consecutive reaction X→Y→Z rate constant K1 for first step and K2 for second step. So 2 activation barriers Ea1 & Ea2
1st step: K1>K2 (Ea1<Ea2)
X disappears quickly lots of Y made transiently
2nd step rate limiting
2nd step: K1=K2 (Ea1 = Ea2)
X disappears more slowly, some Y is made
Barriers equal
3rd step: K1<K2 ( Ea1>Ea2)
X disappears slowly little Y is made
First step rate limiting
Role of non-competitive reversible inhibitors
Have a role in regulating enzyme activity in metabolic pathways - in feedback/forward pathways
A->B<->C<->D<->E<->F
Synthesis of cytidine triphosphate (TP a monomer in RNA)
First commited step A→B condensation of aspartame+ carbomylphosphate → N carbomyl-aspartate
Reaction catalysed by aspartate transcarbamoylase enzyme is inhibited by end product CTP
Enzyme shows non-michaelis Menten kinetics (sigmoid kinetics) due to interacting subunit binding sites causing cooperativity.
CTP binding stabilises T form of the enzyme decreasing affinity for substrates carbamoylphosphate and aspartame. CTP binds at a site on the enzyme separate from the active site where substrate binds (an example of feedback inhibition in metabolic pathway)
Analysis of glucose combustion
If we assume jelly babies are pure glucose
C6H12O6 +6O2 →6CO2+H2O
One jelly baby ~22kcal (92kj) ~6g
1 mol glucose 180g so 30 jelly babies per mol & 1 mol = 2761 kjmol-¹
From standard tables at 298k ∆H combustion =2805kjmol-¹
∆H combustion is pretty close to manufacturers value (by bomb calorimetry accounting for sweet not being 100% Glucose)
Energy released ~20s ~138kjmol-¹s-¹
Or ~4.6kj baby -¹s-¹ (quite a lot)
Energy release is far better controlled in the body. The amount of energy released is the same whether the baby is burnt or metabolised