Term 1 - Mohr circles, frictional sliding, pore fluid pressure, effective stress & hydraulic fracture Flashcards
Fractures
- Two main groups recognized in nature & laboratory experiments with predictable relationships to principle stresses
- Shear fractures (faults)
- Extension or tensile fractures (joints, fissures, veins, dykes..)
“Andersonian” faults shear fractures
• Total angular offset of shear fractures from planes of τmax = φ = ‘angle of internal friction’
Slip on a pre-existing fault
τf=S+μσn
Coulomb-Navier failure criterion describes the shear stress required to initiate a fault in previously intact rock
What about the state of stress required to initiate slip on a pre-existing fault?
Frictional sliding
- Frictional sliding on pre-existing fractures
• Fault surfaces observed in outcrops commonly appear to be smooth / polished…but…
• In reality, fault surfaces are characterised on all scales by interlocking asperities, which give rise to frictional resistance
Experimental version: Byerlee’s Law
Expts show that at shallow depths (< approx. 10km), shear stress for frictional sliding on pre-existing faults is given by:
τ_f=0.85σ_n
At greater depths
τ_f=0.5+0.6σ_n
Holds for a wide range of rock compositions except those that contain water-rich clays
Note that once again prediction is that faults get stronger with depth
μs = 0.6-0.85
Stick-slip vs. stable sliding
• At low confining pressures (<10km) there are two modes of frictional sliding behaviour:
Aseismic stable sliding, ideally at a constant rate with no further increase in stress
• In reality, often see a steady slip hardening due to slip zone damage, so increasing amounts of stress required
• Tends to be most common in uppermost parts of crust (<3km) where σn is lowest and/or in clay-rich fault zone gouges
Seismogenic stick-slip where slip happens during sudden slip events separated by periods of no slip where elastic strain energy builds up
• Release of this energy as frictional strength of fault is exceeded is what causes an earthquake.
• Magnitude of earthquake is related to the size of the associated stress drop
• Dominant at depths below 3km
Earthquake occurance
- A 6.5-6.9 magnitude earthquake along a 15-20km long fault only produces ~1m of offset
- Largest quakes generate offsets of 10-15m
- faults with km-scale offsets require v. large number of earthquakes
- Throw rates from large active faults are typically in the range 1-10mm/yr
- Different patches seem to slip during different events - complex accumulation of displacement over time despite simple overall displacement profile
Cataclasites
- Indicative of faulting at the greatest depths within the brittle crust
- Distributed brittle deformation: ‘ductile’
Pore fluids
pore spaces within crustal rocks are typically filled with fluids: water, hydrocarbons, magma
• The presence of such fluids can have a profound influence on the fracturing behaviour of rocks
• Under equilibrium conditions in a sedimentary basin, hydrostatic pressure = ρwatergh
• Lithostatic pressure = ρrockgh
• Pfp = 0.4 x lithostatic pressure assuming free fluid movement
Overpressure
• Fluids can become overpressured, e.g. oil well data
• Two ways to induce overpressure:
– Restrict fluid movement, e.g. compaction of sediments
– Input new fluid, e.g. diagenesis/ metamorphism; migration of hydrocarbon or magma
Drained vs. undrained triaxial experiments
- Triaxial compression tests
- Samples of clay saturated with pore fluid
Experiment 1: drained (pore fluid can escape)
• As pconf rises, σn rises and, as the fluids are able to leak off, the pfp remains constant: results are the same as for dry clay – ultimate strength rises with increasing depth
Experiment 2: undrained (pore fluid cannot escape)
• As pconf rises, σn rises, but as fluids are not able to leak off, pfp rises by an equal & opposite amount so the ultimate strength remains constant and μ = 0
Key point: it is the fluid pressure, not simply the presence of fluids, that influences the mechanical behaviour of rocks
Concept of effective stress
Terzaghi (1923) introduced the concept of effective (normal) stress, σ_n’, where:
σ_n^’=σ_n-pfp
Pore fluids pressures effectively counteract σ_n
hus we can modify the Coulomb-Navier failure criterion to account for pfp
τ_f=S+μσ_n’
Hydraulic fracturing of ‘fresh’ rock
- Pore fluid pressure counteracts the normal stresses
* The apparent reduction in normal stress results in failure
Ancient hydraulically-induced fractures
- Dykes/sills
* Veins
Modern hydraulically-induced frictional sliding
• Landslides
“Fracking”
Hydraulic fracture stimulation (“fracking”) of shale gas reservoirs works on the same principle!
τ_f=0.85σ_n’ where
σ_n^’=σ_n-pfp