Tax Law L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I) Flashcards
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
1. General Principles – Sections 130 and 132
Sure, here’s a summary of the key principles found in Section 130 of the Local Government Code:
- Uniformity: Taxation must be uniform within each local government unit.
- Equity: Taxes, fees, charges, and other impositions should be based on the taxpayer’s ability to pay and should be equitable.
- Public Purpose: Revenue should be collected only for public purposes.
- Just and Legal: Taxes should not be unjust, excessive, oppressive, or confiscatory, and they should comply with laws, public policy, and national economic policy.
- Prohibition on Privatization: The collection of local taxes should not be outsourced to private entities.
- Benefit to Local Government: Revenue collected should benefit the local government unit levying the tax.
- Progressive Taxation: Local government units should strive to implement a progressive system of taxation, where those who earn more pay a higher proportion of their income in taxes.
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Common Limitations on the Taxing Powers of Local Government Units – Section 133
Certainly! Here’s a summary of the limitations on the taxing powers of local government units as outlined in Section 133 of the Local Government Code, listed numerically for easy memorization:
- Income Tax: Generally not allowed, except when levied on banks and other financial institutions.
- Documentary Stamp Tax: Not allowed.
- Estate and Inheritance Taxes: Not allowed, except as otherwise provided.
- Customs Duties and Fees: Not allowed, except for specific exemptions.
- Taxes on Goods in Transit: Not allowed, including charges for wharfage or tolls.
- Taxes on Agricultural and Aquatic Products: Not allowed when sold by marginal farmers or fishermen.
- Tax Incentives for Business Enterprises: Not allowed for certain periods for BOI-certified enterprises.
- Excise Taxes on National Products: Not allowed.
- Value-Added Tax (VAT): Generally not allowed, except as otherwise provided.
- Taxes on Transportation Services: Not allowed, except as specified.
- Taxes on Insurance Premiums: Not allowed.
- Vehicle Registration and Licensing Fees: Not allowed, except for tricycles.
- Export Taxes: Not allowed, except as otherwise provided.
- Taxes on Registered Countryside and Barangay Businesses: Not allowed.
- Taxes on the National Government: Not allowed.
These limitations ensure a framework for local taxation that respects national economic policies and avoids double taxation or undue burden on certain sectors or transactions.
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Local Business Tax – Sections 143, 145 and 146
Section 143. Tax on Business
Certainly! Here’s a summary of the taxes that may be imposed on businesses as outlined in Section 143 of the Local Government Code, listed numerically for easy memorization:
- Tax on Manufacturers, etc.: Taxes may be imposed on manufacturers, assemblers, brewers, distillers, and other similar businesses based on their gross sales or receipts.
- Tax on Wholesalers, Distributors, etc.: Taxes may be imposed on wholesalers, distributors, or dealers in various articles of commerce based on their gross sales or receipts.
- Tax on Exporters and Essential Commodity Businesses: Taxes may be imposed on exporters, manufacturers, and businesses dealing with essential commodities at a reduced rate compared to other businesses.
- Tax on Retailers: Taxes may be imposed on retailers based on their gross sales or receipts, with rates depending on the amount of sales.
- Tax on Contractors: Taxes may be imposed on contractors based on their gross sales or receipts, with rates varying according to sales.
- Tax on Banks and Financial Institutions: Taxes may be imposed on banks and financial institutions based on their gross receipts from various financial activities.
- Tax on Peddlers: Taxes may be imposed on peddlers engaged in the sale of merchandise or articles of commerce.
- Miscellaneous Business Taxes: Taxes may be imposed on any other business not specified above, subject to certain limitations and regulations.
These provisions allow local governments to levy taxes on various types of businesses operating within their jurisdiction, with rates and conditions specified by the local sanggunian.
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Validity of a Local Tax Ordinance – Section 187
Here are the requirements for the validity of local tax ordinances, summarized and listed numerically for easy memorization:
- Procedure for Approval: Local tax ordinances and revenue measures must follow the procedure outlined in the Local Government Code for approval.
- Mandatory Public Hearings: Public hearings must be conducted prior to the enactment of tax ordinances or revenue measures to ensure transparency and gather input from the community.
- Appeal to Secretary of Justice: Any question regarding the constitutionality or legality of tax ordinances or revenue measures may be appealed to the Secretary of Justice within thirty (30) days from the date of effectivity.
- Decision by Secretary of Justice: The Secretary of Justice shall render a decision within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of the appeal.
- Effectivity of Ordinance: The appeal does not suspend the effectivity of the ordinance or the accrual and payment of the tax, fee, or charge levied therein.
- Court Proceedings: If aggrieved by the decision of the Secretary of Justice or the lapse of the sixty-day period without action, the party may file appropriate proceedings with a court of competent jurisdiction within thirty (30) days.
These requirements ensure that local tax ordinances are enacted through a transparent process and provide avenues for addressing legal concerns or grievances regarding their validity.
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Taxpayer’s Remedies
a. Administrative – Section 195
b. Judicial - SEC195
c. Refund or Credit – Section 196
RULE ON 195
To summarize and list down numerically the taxpayers’ remedies under Section 195 of the Local Government Code:
-
Protest of Assessment:
- The taxpayer has 60 days from receiving the notice of assessment to file a written protest with the local treasurer contesting the assessment.
- If no protest is filed within 60 days, the assessment becomes final and executory.
-
Decision on Protest:
- The local treasurer must decide on the protest within 60 days of its filing.
- If the protest is wholly or partly meritorious, the local treasurer cancels wholly or partially the assessment.
- If the assessment is found to be wholly or partly correct, the protest is denied wholly or partly with notice to the taxpayer.
-
Appeal:
- If the protest is denied or partially denied, the taxpayer has 30 days from receiving the denial or from the lapse of the 60-day period to appeal to the court of competent jurisdiction.
- Failure to appeal within the specified period makes the assessment conclusive and unappealable.
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Assessment and Collection of Local Taxes – Section 194
a. Remedies of Local Government Units
To summarize and list down numerically the tax remedies of local government units under Section 194:
-
Periods of Assessment:
- Local taxes, fees, or charges shall be assessed within five (5) years from the date they became due.
- Taxes, fees, or charges accrued before the effectivity of the Code may be assessed within three (3) years from the date they became due.
-
Fraud or Intent to Evade Payment:
- In cases of fraud or intent to evade payment of taxes, fees, or charges, assessment may be made within ten (10) years from the discovery of the fraud or intent.
-
Periods of Collection:
- Local taxes, fees, or charges may be collected within five (5) years from the date of assessment by administrative or judicial action.
- Taxes, fees, or charges assessed before the effectivity of the Code may be collected within three (3) years from the date of assessment.
-
Suspension of Prescriptive Period:
- The running of the periods of prescription may be suspended under the following circumstances:
- The treasurer is legally prevented from making the assessment or collection.
- The taxpayer requests a reinvestigation and executes a written waiver before the expiration of the assessment or collection period.
- The taxpayer is out of the country or cannot be located.
- The running of the periods of prescription may be suspended under the following circumstances:
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Assessment and Collection of Local Taxes – Section 194
b. Prescriptive Period
To summarize and list down numerically the prescriptive period and injunction under Section 194:
-
Prescriptive Period for Assessment:
- Local taxes, fees, or charges must be assessed within five (5) years from the date they became due.
- Taxes, fees, or charges accrued before the effectivity of the Code may be assessed within three (3) years from the date they became due.
-
Prescriptive Period for Fraud or Evasion:
- In cases of fraud or intent to evade payment, assessment may be made within ten (10) years from the discovery of the fraud or intent.
-
Prescriptive Period for Collection:
- Local taxes, fees, or charges may be collected within five (5) years from the date of assessment by administrative or judicial action.
- Taxes, fees, or charges assessed before the effectivity of the Code may be collected within three (3) years from the date of assessment.
-
Suspension of Prescriptive Period:
- The prescriptive periods provided may be suspended under certain circumstances:
- When the treasurer is legally prevented from making the assessment or collection.
- If the taxpayer requests a reinvestigation and executes a written waiver before the expiration of the assessment or collection period.
- When the taxpayer is out of the country or cannot be located.
- The prescriptive periods provided may be suspended under certain circumstances:
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Assessment and Collection of Local Taxes – Section 194
c. Injunction
The injunction mentioned under Section 194 of the Local Government Code limits the ability to halt the assessment or collection of local taxes, fees, or charges through legal action. Here’s a breakdown:
- Who: This applies to taxpayers who wish to challenge the assessment or collection of local taxes, fees, or charges imposed by local government units.
- Does What: Taxpayers are restricted from obtaining an injunction to stop the local government from assessing or collecting taxes unless they pay the assessed amount under protest.
- Where: This restriction applies within the jurisdiction of the local government unit imposing the taxes, fees, or charges.
- When: The restriction applies when taxpayers seek legal recourse to halt the assessment or collection process.
- How: Taxpayers must pay the assessed amount under protest before seeking an injunction through legal channels.
- Why: This provision aims to ensure the continuous flow of revenue for local government operations and projects by preventing undue delay in the assessment and collection process. It encourages taxpayers to fulfill their obligations while providing a mechanism to challenge assessments through proper channels.
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
1. General Principles – Sections 130 and 132
Certainly! Here’s a summary of the key principles found in Section 132 of the Local Government Code:
- Authority: The power to impose taxes, fees, charges, or generate revenue is vested in the sanggunian (local legislative body) of the concerned local government unit.
- Exercise through Ordinance: This authority is exercised through the enactment of an appropriate ordinance by the sanggunian.
- Legislative Process: The process of passing such ordinances follows the procedures and requirements set forth in the Local Government Code.
- Local Governance: This provision ensures that local taxing authority is exercised within the framework of local governance and under the oversight of the local legislative body.
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Local Business Tax – Sections 143, 145 and 146
Section 145. Retirement of Business.
Certainly! Here’s a summary of the key principles found in Section 145 of the Local Government Code, listed numerically for easy memorization:
- Submission of Sworn Statement: Upon termination of a business subject to tax, the business must submit a sworn statement of its gross sales or receipts for the current year.
- Payment of Tax Difference: If the tax paid during the year is less than the tax due on the gross sales or receipts of the current year, the difference must be paid before the business is considered officially retired.
These principles ensure that businesses fulfill their tax obligations upon retirement and settle any outstanding tax liabilities before ceasing operations.
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Local Business Tax – Sections 143, 145 and 146
Section 146. Payment of Business Taxes. -
Here are the key principles from Section 146 of the Local Government Code, summarized and listed numerically for easy memorization:
- Payment for Every Establishment: Taxes imposed under Section 143 must be paid for each separate or distinct establishment or place where the business subject to tax is conducted. No exemption is granted for conducting multiple businesses together, and each line of business must pay its respective tax.
- Responsibility of the Person Conducting the Business: The tax on a business must be paid by the individual or entity conducting the business.
- Combined Total Gross Sales for Related Businesses: If a person operates multiple businesses subject to the same tax rate, the tax shall be computed based on the combined total gross sales or receipts of these related businesses.
- Separate Reporting for Different Tax Rates: If a person operates multiple businesses subject to different tax rates, the gross sales or receipts of each business shall be separately reported to compute the tax due for each business.
These principles ensure clarity and fairness in the payment of business taxes, preventing evasion and ensuring that each business pays its appropriate share of taxes based on its activities and revenues.
L. Local Taxation (R.A. No. 7160, Book II, Title I)
- Taxpayer’s Remedies
c. Refund or Credit – Section 196
Section 196. Claim for Refund of Tax Credit.
To summarize and list down numerically the key points as to the claim for refund of tax credit under Section 196:
-
Written Claim for Refund or Credit:
- A written claim for refund or credit must be filed with the local treasurer before initiating any case or proceeding for the recovery of any tax, fee, or charge that was erroneously or illegally collected.
-
Time Limit for Filing Claim:
- No case or proceeding can be entertained in any court after the expiration of two (2) years from:
- The date of payment of the tax, fee, or charge, or
- The date the taxpayer is entitled to a refund or credit.
- No case or proceeding can be entertained in any court after the expiration of two (2) years from:
-
Statute of Limitations:
- The two-year period serves as a statute of limitations, beyond which no claim for refund or credit can be pursued in court.
Based on the key points summarized from the search results, here are three challenging MCQ questions on the claim for refund of tax credit under Section 196 of Philippine tax law:
Question 1:
A taxpayer made an erroneous payment of taxes to the local government in January 2022. In December 2023, the taxpayer discovered the error and wanted to file a claim for refund.
According to the rules on claim for refund or credit under Section 196, which of the following statements is CORRECT?
A. The taxpayer can still file a claim for refund with the local treasurer, as the two-year time limit has not yet expired.
B. The taxpayer’s only option is to file a case directly in court, as the two-year time limit for filing a claim with the local treasurer has already passed.
C. The taxpayer cannot file a claim for refund or initiate any case or proceeding, as the two-year time limit has expired.
D. The taxpayer can file a claim for refund with the local treasurer, but the court has the discretion to entertain the case even if the two-year time limit has passed.
Correct Answer: C. The taxpayer cannot file a claim for refund or initiate any case or proceeding, as the two-year time limit has expired.
Explanation:
According to the key points summarized from the search results, Section 196 establishes a two-year time limit for filing a claim for refund or credit. This two-year period serves as a statute of limitations, beyond which no claim for refund or credit can be pursued in court.
In the given scenario, the taxpayer made the erroneous payment in January 2022 and wanted to file a claim for refund in December 2023. Since the two-year time limit has already expired, the taxpayer cannot file a claim for refund with the local treasurer or initiate any case or proceeding in court for the recovery of the erroneously paid taxes.
Option A is incorrect because the two-year time limit has already passed, and the taxpayer can no longer file a claim for refund.
Option B is incorrect because the taxpayer cannot file a case directly in court, as the two-year time limit has expired.
Option D is incorrect because the court does not have the discretion to entertain the case if the two-year time limit has passed, as per the provisions of Section 196.
Question 2:
A taxpayer filed a claim for refund of erroneously paid taxes with the local treasurer in January 2022. The local treasurer did not act on the claim, and the taxpayer decided to file a case in court in March 2024.
Based on the rules on claim for refund or credit under Section 196, which of the following statements is CORRECT?
A. The court can entertain the case, as the taxpayer filed the claim with the local treasurer within the two-year time limit.
B. The court cannot entertain the case, as the taxpayer filed the case in court after the expiration of the two-year time limit.
C. The court can entertain the case, as the two-year time limit only applies to the filing of the claim with the local treasurer, not the filing of the case in court.
D. The court can entertain the case, as the local treasurer’s inaction on the claim should be considered an implicit denial, allowing the taxpayer to file the case in court.
Correct Answer: B. The court cannot entertain the case, as the taxpayer filed the case in court after the expiration of the two-year time limit.
Explanation:
According to the key points summarized from the search results, Section 196 establishes a two-year time limit for filing a claim for refund or credit, and this two-year period serves as a statute of limitations, beyond which no claim for refund or credit can be pursued in court.
In the given scenario, the taxpayer filed the claim for refund with the local treasurer in January 2022, which was within the two-year time limit. However, the taxpayer then filed the case in court in March 2024, which was after the expiration of the two-year time limit.
The search results clearly state that “no case or proceeding can be entertained in any court after the expiration of two (2) years from the date of payment of the tax, fee, or charge, or the date the taxpayer is entitled to a refund or credit.”
Therefore, the court cannot entertain the case, as the taxpayer filed the case in court after the expiration of the two-year time limit.
Option A is incorrect because the filing of the claim with the local treasurer within the two-year time limit does not automatically allow the court to entertain the case if it is filed after the expiration of the time limit.
Option C is incorrect because the two-year time limit applies to both the filing of the claim with the local treasurer and the filing of the case in court.
Option D is incorrect because the local treasurer’s inaction does not override the statutory two-year time limit for filing the case in court.
Based on the key principles summarized from Section 146 of the Local Government Code, here are two challenging MCQ questions:
Question 1:
A business owner named Juan operates a restaurant, a convenience store, and a small manufacturing plant all under the same roof. According to the principles outlined in Section 146, how should Juan’s business taxes be calculated?
A. Juan should pay a single business tax based on the combined total gross sales or receipts of all three of his business operations.
B. Juan should pay separate business taxes for each of his three business operations, based on their individual gross sales or receipts.
C. Juan should only pay business taxes for the restaurant and convenience store, as the manufacturing plant is exempt from local business taxes.
D. Juan can choose to either pay a single business tax based on the combined total gross sales or pay separate taxes for each business operation.
Correct Answer: B. Juan should pay separate business taxes for each of his three business operations, based on their individual gross sales or receipts.
Explanation:
According to the key principles summarized from Section 146 of the Local Government Code:
- Taxes imposed must be paid for each separate or distinct establishment or place where the business subject to tax is conducted. No exemption is granted for conducting multiple businesses together.
- The tax on a business must be paid by the individual or entity conducting the business.
- If a person operates multiple businesses subject to different tax rates, the gross sales or receipts of each business shall be separately reported to compute the tax due for each business.
In the given scenario, Juan operates three distinct business operations (a restaurant, a convenience store, and a manufacturing plant) under the same roof. Based on the principles outlined in Section 146, Juan must pay separate business taxes for each of these three operations, based on their individual gross sales or receipts.
Option A is incorrect because the taxes cannot be calculated based on the combined total gross sales or receipts of all three businesses, as they are separate and distinct operations.
Option C is incorrect because there is no exemption for the manufacturing plant, and all three businesses must be taxed separately.
Option D is incorrect because the taxpayer does not have the option to choose between a single combined tax or separate taxes for each business. The law requires separate taxation for each distinct business operation.