Task 3 Flashcards

1
Q

History introspection

A
  • William James: introspection was primary means of studying consciousness and the mind
  • > most british psychologists did not distinguish between consciousness and mind
  • Behaviorists: introspection was rarely used
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

introspection

A
  • looking into mind, observing components
  • reflective consciousness
  • introspection is really retrospection -> observing our remembered past conscious experiences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

introspective verbal report

A

-verbal description of your conscious experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ordinary verbal responses (compared to introspective report)

A
  • responses to primary cognitive tasks of an experiment (tasks requiring memory, judgment, or decision making)
  • > could in most cases be replaced by simple mechanical responses (e.g. pushing buttons labelled by appropriate words)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

analytic introspection

A
  • classical introspection
  • describe conscious experience in terms of their elementary constituents
  • e.g. table = rectangle with edges
  • if you say ‘i see a table’ that’s a stimulus error
  • advocated by Edward Titchener
  • structuralism -> believe that conscious experience is constructed from a limited number of ‘elements’
  • unreliable, no understanding of practical applications
  • behaviorism was an alternative to structuralism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

descriptive introspection

A
  • description of conscious experience in natural language terms
  • what! did i perceive/think/feel?
  • concerns meaningful events, objects and people
  • reflective consciousness
  • naturally involves categorizing experiences but no analysis or interpretation of their causes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Interpretive introspection

A
  • why! do i feel this?
  • discover antecedents of thoughts/feelings/actions
  • e.g. is love a directly felt conscious experience or is it an inference based on how we behave when we are in love?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Limitations of introspective verbal report

A

1) forgetting

2) reconstruction error
- recalling more than one actually remembers

3) verbal description difficulties
4) distortion through observation
5) censorship

6) experimental demands
- subject tries to figure out what the experimenter expects

7) lack of independent verification
- not possible to independently check on accuracy of subject’s report

8) substitution of inferences for observations
- > when doing interpretative introspection
- > inferences are heavily influenced by a priori theories about causes of human actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Methods of obtaining introspective reports

A

1) thinking out loud
2) thought sampling
- whenever a signal occurs -> one has to report what they were thinking at that moment
3) retrospective reports
4) event recording
- to know how often someone has a particular type of thought -> subject notes each occurrence of the type of thought
5) diaries
6) group questionnaires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can we figure out the neural correlates of conscious visual awareness?

A
  • we have to contract NC of stimulus processing with awareness with NC of stimulus processing without awareness
  • we have to erase an otherwise visible stimulus from awareness -> degraded visual stimulation
  • difficulties: we need conditions that aren’t necessarily everyday-situations; often we can’t use the same stimulus for both conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Visual Backward Masking

A
  • brief target stimulus followed shortly thereafter by a mask
  • > target can be erased from visual awareness
  • different stimuli, only short period of time
  • > stimulus may be unidentifiable but yet detectable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

visual crowding

A

normally visible figure can be unrecognisable when flanked by other nearby stimuli

  • peripheral visual field only, so not where awareness is ordinarily focused
  • may be unidentifiable but yet detectable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bistable perception

A

-ambiguous figures
-> fluctuations in perception despite unchanging visual stimulation
-given perceptual awareness moves in and out of awareness
-changing pattern sin neural activity despite invariant stimulation
+perceptual state lasts for seconds, alternate states are mutually exclusive, figures can be large
- inability to predict when perception will change, not a lot of figures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Binocular rivalry

A

-presenting different image to each eye -> produces fluctuations in visual awareness
+ wide variety of patterns that can be strategically designed to target specific brain areas
+ can see whether visual patterns remain effective when suppressed from awareness
-unpredictable switches, periods of mixed dominance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

motion induced blindness

A
  • stationary visual stimuli disappear as if erased in front of an observer’s eyes when masked with a moving background
  • small object embedded in larger optic flow field
  • object can disappear from awareness for several seconds at a time
  • unpredictable fluctuations in visibility, stable fixation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Inattentional blindness

A
  • when engaged in a demanding task, observers may fail to detect a salient but unexpected stimulus
  • only works in some people
17
Q

change blindness

A

-when viewing 2 successive pictures separated by a blank interval, observers might fail to notice a change in the picture
+common, everyday experiences, many stimuli
-may not always represent pure cases of perception without awareness but failure to report

18
Q

attentional blink

A
  • when 2 (or more) visual targets within a rapidly presented sequence of items -> observers are likely to miss the second target when it closely follows the first
  • unpredictable appearance of first item attracts all attention to it
  • still the second one can impact visual processing

+variety of stimuli, size not crucial, central and peripheral viewing, no changes in stimulus conditions, timing strictly determined, occurs despite foreknowledge so you can repeatedly test