TASK 2 - SDT Flashcards
signal detection theory (SDT)
= alternating experimental trials which present a stimulus (S + N) and trials without a stimulus (only noise = N)
- -> theoretical framework for decision-making under uncertainty/near threshold
- used to quantify perceptual sensitivity and decision strategy of subject
- can be applied to any situation with two discrete states of the world (signal or no signal) –> 2 x 2 design
- used as guide to maximise payoffs (decide optimally)
signal
= stimulus presented to the subject (S+N curve)
- low-intensity or near threshold
noise
= all other stimuli in the environment (N distribution)
a) internal noise: differences in neural processing, perception, individual baseline neural firing
b) external noise: differences in external environment (light source,sounds)
SDT
- assumptions
a) internal noise has specific distribution (normal)
b) same noise distribution for N and S+N trials
c) signal and noise add up linearly (no interaction)
d) decision is based on two consecutive processing stages: sensory (sensitivity) –> decision stage (strategy) –> response
SDT
- outcomes
- 2 conditions + 2 possible responses –> 4 outcomes
1. correct rejection = no tone + “no” (correct)
2. false alarm = no tone + “yes” (mistake)
3. miss = tone + “no” (mistake)
4. hit = tone + “yes” (correct)
probability distributions
= show frequency of trials against the internal response (X) strength
- N distribution: probability that given perceptual effect will be caused by noise
- -> P(FA)+P(CR)=1
- S+N distribution: probability that a given perceptual effect will be caused by signal (and noise)
- -> P(H)+P(M)=1
probability distributions
- internal response (X)
= perceived loudness = what the subject experiences on each trial, personal neural evidence
- -> if internal response strong = decide that signal was present
- on most trials the internal response is intermediate = not 100% sure that signal was present
- S+N distribution always more to the right from N distribution –> when signal is present, internal response always stronger
- -> stronger signal pushes S+N distribution more to the right ( automatically stronger internal response)
probability distributions
- decision criteria (Xc)
= if internal response exceeds (personal) decision criteria (Xc), subject decides that the signal was present
- N distribution: left from Xc (say no) = CR; right from Xc (say yes) = FA
- S+N distribution: left from Xc = M; right from XC = H
decision criteria
- strategies
- subjects decision whether signal was presented depends on the location of their criterion
a) liberal criterion: far to the left; FA and H high
b) conservative criterion: middle; FA fairly low, H fairly high
c) neutral criterion: far to the right; FA and H low
sensitivity
= d’ = measure of sensitivity
= distance between the means of the two distributions normalised to their average std. dev.; 1/(area where two distributions overlap)
- assumptions: normal distribution, independence of sensitivity and bias
–> increasing d’ will lead to less errors (less confusion, more certainty that stimulus presented)
d’
- computation
= Z(P(H))-Z(P(FA)) = (mean (S+) - mean (N))/√(0.5*(variance (S+N) ^2 + varaiance (N) ^2)
- need proabilities of FA and H (number of FA or H/ total number of N trials or S+N trials)
d’
- interpretation
d’ > 0: high sensitivity (good hearing), able to detect signal, task not too difficult
d’ = 0: just guessing (N and S+N graphs completely overlap)
d’ < 0: high sensitivity but error/cofusion of answers (press yes when no meant)
factors influencing d’
- increase intensity of stimulus
= increases d’
- S+N trials generally cause stronger internal response –> graph more to the right
- -> overlap of both graphs smaller: easier to differentiate whether signal was present or not
- affect the means of the graphs (difference between means increases)
factors influencing d’
- more sensitive subject
= increase d’
- subject has stronger internal response to stimulus (hears better than ‘normal’ participants; task is too easy) –> graph more to the right
- -> overlap decreases
- affect the means of the graphs (difference between means increases)
factors influencing d’
- reduce variability of noise
= increase d’
- graphs become narrower (less influencing factors) –> can only be controlled for if experimenters know the noise)
- affect variation of graphs (graphs do not spread so much)