Tactical Price Management Flashcards

1
Q

Heuristics

A

a. Cost-Oriented Pricing – e.g. costs + mark up
i. Not ideal – customers might be willing to pay much more or are not willing to pay that much
ii. Dangerous to ignore the willingness to pay

b. Customer-oriented - e. g., Perceived-Value
i. Could be that you are no longer covering your costs

c. Competition Oriented - e. g., Going-Rate
i. Competition is much cheaper then you will not make a lot of profit

–> strategies only focus on one thing (competition, costs or customer, you want to look at all of them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Optimization based on response functions

A
  • Estimate a response model: Sales = f (Price)
  • Determine values of marketing mix variables that maximize profit
  • More complex models:
    1. Decision Support Systems (DSS)
    2. Marketing Analytics
  • Models cannot replace managers!
  • -> If model results do not match up with managerial intuitions, both have to be reviewed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Advantages of model-based planning:

A
  1. Assumptions have to be revealed

2. Models yield a better understanding of problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Elasticity

A

= percentage change in a dependent variable (e. g., unit sales) divided by the percentage change in an explanatory (independent) variable (e. g., price)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Direct price elasticity

A

a. Rule: |e| > 1 resp. e < -1
b. Exceptions (-1 < e < 0):
i. Consumers do not notice changes in price
ii. Searching for alternatives is too costly for consumers
iii. Consumers are not able to substitute products in the short run
c. Exceptions (e > 0):
i. Giffen effect (decrease in real income for inferior good)
ii. Snob effect
iii. Price as an indicator of quality
iv. Expectation effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cross price elasticity

A

a. For substitutes > 0

b. For complements < 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Linear response function

A

a. Q = b0 − b1 ∙ P und ε = −b1 ∙ P/Q
b. Easy to visualize and understand
c. Parameters can be easily estimated (standard regression methods)
d. Within small intervals, a linear approximation of more complicated functions is possible („window argument“)
e. Constant marginal returns are not realistic - Q can become negative
f. Increasing |elasticities| (with increasing price) are not realistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Multiplicate response function

A

a. Q = b0 ∙ P hoch b1und ε = b1
b. A simple transformation (taking the logarithm of both sides) can turn the multiplicative response function into a linear function, and the parameters of the transformed function can be estimated through linear regression analysis
c. ln(Q) = ln(b0) + b1 ∙ ln(x)
d. With appropriate parameter values (exponents) decreasing, constant, and increasing marginal returns can be modeled
e. Decreasing |marginal returns| are more realistic than constant ones
f. Constant elasticity (b1) is practical
g. No saturation level (at very low prices)
h. Not defined for X = 0 (problem for budget instruments, e.g., advertising)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Models with Competition

A
  1. Dependent variables:
    a. Unit Sales
    b. Market share - relevant in case of competition
    c. Market volume - relevant in case of competition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Simple market share models:

A

a. Linear: SA= b0 + b1 ∙ PA + b2 ∙ PB
with: S = market share, P = Price, A,B = Products
b. Multiplicative: SA = b0 ∙ PA hoch b1 ∙ PB hoch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Models with Competition - Problem

A

Models do not necessarily meet constraints:

a. Market shares should range from 0 to 1 (range constraint)
b. Market shares should sum up to 1 across brands (sum constraint)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Attraction Function

A

= Model which satisfies the range and the sum constraints: attraction function

  • Market share of brand i = attraction of brand i / Sum of attraction s of all brands
  • Our share = Us / Us + them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Data for Estimating Response Functions

A
  1. Data sources:
    a. Market Data, Experiments, Analogies and Meta-Analyses, Expert Judgment, Surveys, Auction
  2. Data Requirements:
    a. Availability, Quality, Variability, Quantity, Costs
  3. Analysis of Market Data
    a. Data on past prices and sales
    b. Analysis: estimate response function –> sales = f(price, controls)
    c. Data sources: Company records, Panel data, Household panel, Store panel (scanner data), Single-source panel, Loyalty programs …
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Data for Estimating Response Functions - Problems

A
  1. Enough variation in price?
  2. Multicollinearity (–> difficult to separate price effect from other effects)
  3. Endogeneity (–> difficult to establish causality)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Experiments

A
  1. Definition:
    a. Empirical test of causal hypotheses
    b. Manipulation of treatment variables whilst keeping all other variables constant
  2. Types: Field vs. laboratory experiments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Managers‘ view on field experiments

A

a. Expensive and time consuming
b. Results are informative for competitors
c. It is difficult to control for all outside influences
d. If marketing efforts are reduced in the experiment, there is a risk of losing customers
e. If marketing efforts are increased in the experiment, there is a risk of upsetting customers when marketing returns to regular level

17
Q

Analogies

A
  1. Basis: elasticities –> invariant to scaling –> comparable
  2. Analogies
    a. Can known elasticity estimates be applied to other products, regions, time periods?
    b. Problems: Reliability, Generalizability
18
Q

Meta-Analyses

A

a. Systematic analysis of various estimated elasticity values
b. Advantage: broad data pool
c. Collection of numerous elasticity results
i. Empirical results from different sources
ii. Estimates typically show a large variance
d. Calculation of mean elasticity values
i. Price: -1.76 (Tellis 1988), 2.62 (Bijmolt/van Heerde/Pieters 2005)
e. Variance of elasticity values can by explained by
i. Methodology (e. g. functional form, data), Objects (e. g., products), Regions (e. g., countries), Time
f. Problem: publication bias (non-significant and non-plausible values are often not published)

19
Q

Expert Judgment

A
  1. Typical problems of objective data:
    a. Market data typically has low variance
    b. Experiments are costly
    c. Markets may not be comparable
  2. Basic idea of expert judgment (= subjective estimation):
    a. Managers have a good market knowledge, which is the basis for their (intuitive) decisions
    b. Managers are asked to make point estimates
    c. A response function is estimated based on these point estimates
20
Q

Evaluation of expert judgment

A

a. At least the same quality as intuitive decisions
b. Knowledge is revealed –> discussions get more objective
c. Reflection on problem is encouraged

21
Q

Considering Uncertainty

A
  1. Environmental uncertainty (e. g. competitive actions) and uncertainty regarding response parameters
  2. Sensitivity analysis:
    a. „What if“ analysis
    b. How does variation in the different parameter values change the results (e. g. profit contribution)?
    c. What is the optimal marketing mix for different parameter values?
  3. Risk analysis:
    a. Method: Monte Carlo simulation
    b. Input: Probability distributions of uncertain parameters
    c. Output: Probability distribution of results (e. g. profit contribution)