Tactical Price Management Flashcards
Heuristics
a. Cost-Oriented Pricing – e.g. costs + mark up
i. Not ideal – customers might be willing to pay much more or are not willing to pay that much
ii. Dangerous to ignore the willingness to pay
b. Customer-oriented - e. g., Perceived-Value
i. Could be that you are no longer covering your costs
c. Competition Oriented - e. g., Going-Rate
i. Competition is much cheaper then you will not make a lot of profit
–> strategies only focus on one thing (competition, costs or customer, you want to look at all of them)
Optimization based on response functions
- Estimate a response model: Sales = f (Price)
- Determine values of marketing mix variables that maximize profit
- More complex models:
1. Decision Support Systems (DSS)
2. Marketing Analytics - Models cannot replace managers!
- -> If model results do not match up with managerial intuitions, both have to be reviewed
Advantages of model-based planning:
- Assumptions have to be revealed
2. Models yield a better understanding of problems
Elasticity
= percentage change in a dependent variable (e. g., unit sales) divided by the percentage change in an explanatory (independent) variable (e. g., price)
Direct price elasticity
a. Rule: |e| > 1 resp. e < -1
b. Exceptions (-1 < e < 0):
i. Consumers do not notice changes in price
ii. Searching for alternatives is too costly for consumers
iii. Consumers are not able to substitute products in the short run
c. Exceptions (e > 0):
i. Giffen effect (decrease in real income for inferior good)
ii. Snob effect
iii. Price as an indicator of quality
iv. Expectation effect
Cross price elasticity
a. For substitutes > 0
b. For complements < 0
Linear response function
a. Q = b0 − b1 ∙ P und ε = −b1 ∙ P/Q
b. Easy to visualize and understand
c. Parameters can be easily estimated (standard regression methods)
d. Within small intervals, a linear approximation of more complicated functions is possible („window argument“)
e. Constant marginal returns are not realistic - Q can become negative
f. Increasing |elasticities| (with increasing price) are not realistic
Multiplicate response function
a. Q = b0 ∙ P hoch b1und ε = b1
b. A simple transformation (taking the logarithm of both sides) can turn the multiplicative response function into a linear function, and the parameters of the transformed function can be estimated through linear regression analysis
c. ln(Q) = ln(b0) + b1 ∙ ln(x)
d. With appropriate parameter values (exponents) decreasing, constant, and increasing marginal returns can be modeled
e. Decreasing |marginal returns| are more realistic than constant ones
f. Constant elasticity (b1) is practical
g. No saturation level (at very low prices)
h. Not defined for X = 0 (problem for budget instruments, e.g., advertising)
Models with Competition
- Dependent variables:
a. Unit Sales
b. Market share - relevant in case of competition
c. Market volume - relevant in case of competition
Simple market share models:
a. Linear: SA= b0 + b1 ∙ PA + b2 ∙ PB
with: S = market share, P = Price, A,B = Products
b. Multiplicative: SA = b0 ∙ PA hoch b1 ∙ PB hoch
Models with Competition - Problem
Models do not necessarily meet constraints:
a. Market shares should range from 0 to 1 (range constraint)
b. Market shares should sum up to 1 across brands (sum constraint)
Attraction Function
= Model which satisfies the range and the sum constraints: attraction function
- Market share of brand i = attraction of brand i / Sum of attraction s of all brands
- Our share = Us / Us + them
Data for Estimating Response Functions
- Data sources:
a. Market Data, Experiments, Analogies and Meta-Analyses, Expert Judgment, Surveys, Auction - Data Requirements:
a. Availability, Quality, Variability, Quantity, Costs - Analysis of Market Data
a. Data on past prices and sales
b. Analysis: estimate response function –> sales = f(price, controls)
c. Data sources: Company records, Panel data, Household panel, Store panel (scanner data), Single-source panel, Loyalty programs …
Data for Estimating Response Functions - Problems
- Enough variation in price?
- Multicollinearity (–> difficult to separate price effect from other effects)
- Endogeneity (–> difficult to establish causality)
Experiments
- Definition:
a. Empirical test of causal hypotheses
b. Manipulation of treatment variables whilst keeping all other variables constant - Types: Field vs. laboratory experiments