Table of Contents Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Chapter 700 - Examination of Applicaitons

A

statutory authority for examination

requisites of the application

search and requirements for information

patentability reports

rejection of claims

examiner’s letter or action

order of examination

suspension of action

period for reply

abandonment of patent application

interviews

amendments, applicant’s action

swearing behind a reference - affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a)

affidavits or declarations traversing rejections, 37 CFR 1.132

prior art exceptions under AIA 35 USC 102(b)(1) and (2)

affidavit or declaration to disqualify commonly owned patent as prior art, 37 CFR 1.131(c)

file wrapper

public use proceedings

trade secret, proprietary, and protective order materials, expunge information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Chapter 2100 - Patentability

A

patent examination process

patentable subject matter

patentable subject matter - living subject matter

patent subject matter eligibility

guidelines for examination of applications for compliance with the utility requirement

claim interpretation; broadest reasonable interpretation

requirements of rejection based on inherency; burden of proof

product-by-process claims

apparatus and article claims - functional language

material or article worked upon by apparatus

prior art; general level of operability required to make a prima facie case

discussion of utility in the prior art

rejection over prior art’s broad disclosure instead of preferred embodiments

exception to the rule that the critical reference date must precede the filing date

drawings as prior art

availability of a document as a “patent” for purposes of rejection under 35 USC 102(a) or Pre-AIA 35 USC 102(a), (b), and (d)

domestic and foreign patent applications as prior art

“printed publications” as prior art

admissions as prior art

anticipation - application of 35 USC 102

Pre-AIA 35 USC 102(a)

Pre-AIA 35 USC 102(b)

Pre-AIA 35 USC 102(c)

Pre-AIA 35 USC 102(d)

Pre-AIA 35 USC 102(e)

Pre-AIA 35 USC 102(f)

Pre-AIA 35 USC 102(g)

examination guidelines for determining obviousness under 35 USC 103

legal concept of prima facie obviousness

examples of basic requirements of a prima facie case of obviousness

supporting a rejection under 35 USC 103

consideration of applicant’s rebuttal arguments

Pre-AIA 35 USC 103(c)

examination guidelines for 35 USC 102 and 103 as amended by the first inventor to file provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act

overview of the changes to 35 USC 102 and 103 in the AIA

detailed discussion of AIA 35 USC 102(a) and (b)

prior art exceptions under 35 USC 102(b)(1) to AIA 35 USC 102(a)(1)

provisions pertaining to subject matter in a US patent or application effectively filed before the EFD of the claimed invention

use of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130 to overcome prior art rejections

joint research agreements

improper naming of inventors

AIA 35 USC 103

applicability date provisions and determining whether an application is subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA

3 separate requirements for specification under 35 USC 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 USC 112, First paragraph

policy underlying 35 USC 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 USC 112, First paragraph

guidelines for the examination of patent applications under the 35 USC 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 USC 112, paragraph 1, “written description” requirement

the enablement requirement

the best mode requirement

2 separate requirements for claims under 35 USC 112(b) or Pre-AIA 35 SUC 112, second paragraph

subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention

claims must particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention

relationship between the requirements of 35 USC 112(a) and (b) or Pre-AIA 35 USC 112, first and second paragraphs

identifying and interpreting a 35 USC 112(f) or Pre-AIA 35 USC 112, 6th paragraph limitation

search and identification of the prior art

making a prima facie case of equivalence

determining whether an applicant has met the burden of proving nonequivalence after a prima facie case is made

related issues under 35 USC 112(a) or (b) and Pre-AIA 35 USC 112, 1st or 2nd paragraphs

relationship to the doctrine of equivalents

prosecution laches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Chapter 1800 - Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

A

basic patent cooperation treaty (PCT) principles

PCT definitions

reservations under the PCT taken by, and notifications of incompatibility made by, the US of A

where to file an international application

applicants and inventors

agent or common representative and general power of attorney

change in or revocation of the appointment of an agent or a common representative

PAIR access

filing date requirements

elements of the international application

PCT member states

earlier search

signature of applicant

the request

the description

the claims

the drawings

the abstract

fees

priority claim and document

international application transmittal letter

license request for foreign filing under the PCT

correspondence

rectification of obvious mistakes

the international searching authority

basic flow under the PCT

the international search

the international search report

written opinion of the international searching authority

sequence listings

unity of invention before the international searching authority

identification of patent documents

taking into account results of earlier searches

amendment under PCT article 19

supplementary international searches

international publication

withdrawal of international application, designations, or priority claims

international preliminary examination procedure

agreement with the international bureau to serve as an international preliminary examining authority

the demand and preparation for filing of demand

filing of demand

preliminary examination fees

correction of defects in the demand

notification to international bureau of demand

priority document and translation thereof

processing amendments filed under article 19 and article 34 prior to or at the start of international preliminary examination by the examining corps

determination if international preliminary examination is required and possible

unity of invention before the international preliminary examining authority

notation of errors and informalities by the examiner

nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence listings during the international preliminary examination

preparation of the written opinion of the international preliminary examining authority

preparation of the international preliminary examination report

withdrawal of demand or election

receipt of notice of election and preliminary examination report by the USPTO

national stage (US national application filed under 35 USC 371)

a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part application of a PCT application designating the US

the differences between a national application filed under 35 USC 111(a) and a National Stage Application submitted under 35 USC 371

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Chapter 800 - Restriction in Applications Filed Under 35 USC 111; Double Patenting

A

basis for restriction practice in statute and rules

restriction - when proper

definition of double patenting

effect of improper joinder in patent determination of distinctness or independence of claimed inventions

patentability report practice has no effect on restriction practice

reasons for insisting upon restriction

linking claims

action on the merits

time for making requirement

who should make the requirement

indicate exactly how application is to be restricted

make requirement complete

outline of letter of restriction requirement

election and reply

office generally does not permit shift

treatment of claims held to be drawn to nonelected inventions

claims to inventions that are not patentably distinct in plural applications of same applicant or assignee

unity of invention under the patent cooperation treaty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Chapter 600 - Parts, Form, and Content of Application

A

content of provisional and nonprovisional application

oaths and declarations

supplemental oath or declaration

substitute statements

applicant

title of invention

filing fee

disclosure (specification, drawing, models, exhibits, specimens, new matter, sequence listing)

Information Disclosure Statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Chapter 1200 - Appeal

A

composition of Board

administrative handling

notice of appeal

appeal brief

amendments and affidavits or other evidence filed with or after appeal

examiner’s answer

reply briefs and fee for forwarding appeal

oral hearing

actions subsequent to examiner’s answer but before board’s decision

remand by director or board

Board requires appellant to address matter

decision by Board

procedure following decision by Board

withdrawal or dismissal of appeal

judicial review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly