T Flashcards
BATTERY
1) INTENT
2) HARMFUL OR OFFENSIVE CONTACT
ASSAULT
1) INTENT
2) REASONABLE APPREHENSION OF AN IMMINENT BATTERY
TRESPASS TO CHATTEL
1) INTENT
2) INTERFERENCE W USE
3) REMEDY= ACTUAL DAMAGES
CONVERSION
1) INTENT
2) SUBSTANTIAL INTERFERENCE W USE
3) REMEDY= FMV OF PROPERTY AT CONVERSION
TRESPASS TO LAND
1) INTENT
2) PHYSICAL INVASION OF LAND
IIED
1) INTENT OR RECKLESSNESS
2) EXTREME AND OUTRAGEOUS CONDUCT
3) SEVERE EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
BYSTANDER RULE IIED
1) CLOSE FAMILY MEMBER
2) D HAD KNOWLEDGE
3) SEVERE ED
NON FAMILY MEMBER BYSTANDERS IIED
BYSTANDER MUST SUFFER PHYSICAL HARM
FALSE IMPRISONMENT
1) INTENT
2) CONFINED, BOUNDED AREA
3) AWARE OF CONFINEMENT
SHOPKEEPER PRIVILEGE
1) REASONABLE BELIEF
2) DETAINED IN A REASONABLE MANNER
3) REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME
NEGLIGENT TRESPASS TO LAND
1) NEGLIGENTLY ENTER LAND OF ANOTHER
2) LIABLE FOR DAMAGE TO LAND
NEGLIGENT IIED
1) NEGLIGENT CONDUCT
2) ZONE OF DANGER
3) SEVERE EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND PHYSICAL HARM
BYSTANDER RULE NIED
1) CLOSE FAMILY MEMBER
2) EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
MISHANDLING OF A CORPSE
1) NEGLIGENT HANDLING OF A CORPSE
2) NO PHYSICAL HARM REQ’D
TRANSFERRED INTENT
D INTENDS TO COMMIT A TORT, BUT COMMITS:
1) A DIFF TORT OR
2) THE SAME TORT AGAINST A DIFF PERSON
TRANSFERRED INTENT, BOTH TORTS MUST BE FROM THE FOLLOWING:
ASSAULT
BATTERY
FALSE IMPRISONMENT
TRESPASS TO LAND
TRESPASS TO CHATTEL
DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS; CONSENT
1) IMPLIED OR EXPRESS
2) CANNOT EXCEED SCOPE OF CONSENT
DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS; SELF DEFENSE
1) REASONABLE BELIEF OF ATTACK
2) REASONABLE FORCE
DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS; DEFENSE OF OTHERS
REASONABLE BELIEF THIRD PARTY TO BE ATTACKED
DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS; DEFENSE OF PROPERTY
1) REASONABLE FORCE
2) REASONABLE BELIEF TO STOP INVASION OF LAND
3) CANNOT USE DEADLY FORCE TO DEFEND PROPERTY
PRIVATE NECESSITY
DEFENSE TO TRESPASS
LIABLE FOR DAMAGES TO PROPERTY
PUBLIC NECESSITY
1) PREVENTING PUBLIC HARM
2) NOT LIABLE FOR DAMAGES TO PROPERTY
NEGLIGENCE
1) DUTY
2) BREACH
3) CAUSATION
4) DAMAGES
DUTY
OWED TO FORSEEABLE PLAINTIFFS
STANDARD OF CARE
REASONABLY PRUDENT PERSON
UNKNOWN TRESPASSER
NO DUTY OF CARE
KNOWN TRESPASSER
WARN OF KNOWN DANGERS
LICENSEE
SOCIAL GUEST
WARN OF KNOWN DANGERS
INVITEE
BUSINESSES
WARN, INSPECT, AND MAKE SAFE
DUTY OF A PARENT
KNEW/ SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT CHILD WAS LIKELY TO CAUSE HARM
NO GENERAL DUTY TO RESCUE UNLESS
1) ASSUMPTION OF DUTY
2) SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP
SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP
COMMON CARRIER
INNKEEPER/GUEST
TEACHER/STUDENT
EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE
DUTY OF A CHILD
OTHER CHILDREN OF SAME AGE, EXPERIENCE, AND MATURITY
DUTY OF A PROFESSIONAL
SIMILAR PROFESSIONALS W THE SAME EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND CUSTOMS
EXAMPLE:
o Doctor
o Lawyer
o Professional Athlete
BREACH OF DUTY
FAILURE TO COMPLY W DUTY OF CARE