sz - treatment Flashcards
outline drug therapy for sz?
The introduction of anti-psychotic drugs (also known as neuroleptics) has revolutionised the treatment of schizophrenia. They work by reducing the action of the neurotransmitter dopamine in areas of the brain associated with SZ. These reduce symptoms to allow for some degree of functioning to become possible, but they do not offer a cure. There are two types:
Typical anti-psychotics (e.g. Chlorpromazine): stops dopamine production by blocking receptors in synapses. They are dopamine antagonists; in that they bind to but do not stimulate dopamine receptors (particularly the D₂ receptors in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway). This reduces positive symptoms, such as auditory hallucinations.
Atypical anti-psychotics (e.g. Clozapine): act on serotonin and dopamine production systems, and affect negative symptoms, such as reduced emotional expression. They have some side effects such as weight gain, but a lower risk of the extrapyramidal side effects, due to the fact that they only temporarily occupy the D₂ receptors, and then rapidly dissociate to allow normal dopamine transmission.
Atypical has less side effects
Atypical produces negative effects whereas typical is more positive
Typical only acts on dopamine, Atypical acts on serotonin and dopamine
explain research into anti-psychotics
Leucht et al. (2012) carried out a meta analyses involving nearly 6000 patients who had been stabilised on antipsychotics. Some were taken off the drugs and given a placebo instead. Within 12 months, 64% of the patients given the placebo had relapsed, compared with 27% who had stayed on the drug.
This suggests that the drug is effective, as the placebo has a higher relapse rate than people who stayed on the drug, therefore it must be an effective treatment
However there was still 27% relapse so there is likely to be another variable effecting schizophrenia
Even on a placebo, some people did not relapse, therefore some of the recovery must be partly psychosomatic
explain research into the side effects of anti-pscyhotics
Kapur et al. (2000) estimated that between 60%- 75% of D₂ receptors in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway must be blocked in order for these drugs to be effective in reducing symptoms. However in order to do this, a similar number of D₂ receptors in other areas of the brain must also be blocked leading to undesirable side effects
Extrapyramidial side effects:
Parkinson related symptoms
Tardive dyskinesia – involuntary movement of face/tongue/jaw
May make them stop taking the drugs
Also neuroleptic malignant syndrome – high temp, delerium and coma, can cause death
study into effectiveness of typical and atypical anti-psychotic drugs
Scholer et al (2005) Compared the effectiveness of typical and atypical anti-psychotic drugs
They found that 75% of patients experienced at least 20% reduction in their symptoms, when taking atypical drugs, 55% of patients on typical relapsed compared to 42% on atypical, Side effects were fewer with atypical
Reduction in symptoms of ¾ of patients
Atypical less side effects
Atypical seems more effective
Atypical lower relapse rate
study to evaluate effectiveness of typical and atypical anti-pscyhotics
However - Other studies have found conflicting results, e.g. Kahn (2008) found that atypical anti-psychotics were not more effective than typical anti-psychotic drugs.
However the results we see might be because people continue to take the atypical due to less side effects
This makes it appear as if the drug is more effective when actually it is not
explain ethical issues of drug treatments?
In US a large out of court settlement was awarded to a Tardive Dyskinesia sufferer based on Human Rights Act 1988 ‘noone shall be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’
Comment on the cost-benefit analysis of typical antipsychotics
More people will be able to function better and work if they can lower delusions – benefit
Lots of risks and side-effects - cost
Issue of consent- can patients with delusions give consent
explain motivational deficits of drug treatment?
Ross and Read (2004). Drugs reduce the effects but not the cause, and therefore they decrease the motivation of the patient to find their cause of schizophrenia
Problem – if you keep on giving a patient drugs they become less motivated to find the root cause of the SZ and therefore recovery might be less good
Comment on the issue of drug producing companies.
In 2011, 3.1 million Americans were prescribed antipsychotics, generating $18.2 billion in profits. Prescriptions for atypical antipsychotics increased by 93% between 2001 and 2011, though the incidence rate of SZ and depression remained approximately the same. Comment on the issue of drug producing companies.
Only controlling symptoms
Drug companies sponsor people to research the effectiveness of their drugs
File draw effect – headline stats we see might not be the actual ones
Theoretic issue with dopamine hypothesis?
Treatment causation fallacy
Theory of hyperdopaminergia as a theory was made after the treatment found
This is a potential evaluation issue as the causes of schizophrenia have been assumed
what are the strengths of drugs as a treatment?
Economically better to have people living outside and working with less symptoms
Apart from effectiveness, briefly explain one limitation of drug therapy for schizophrenia. (Total 2 marks)
One limitation of drug therapy is that it only treats the symptoms of SZ and not the actual root cause, this creates a sense of dependency and patients are less likely to be motivated to find the root cause. Without finding the root cause, participants are more liekly to relapse.
outline the Psychological Therapies?
CBT is the main psychological treatment for schizophrenia. However, antipsychotics are often used before or alongside CBT to reduce psychotic thought processes, ensuring CBT is most effective, and to reduce patient dropout rate (Kuipers et al, 1997). CBT is then take undertaken around once every 10 days for about 12 sessions.
CBT aims to identify and alter irrational thinking. Drawings are employed to display links between sufferers’ thoughts, actions (behavioura) and emotions; comprehension of the origins of their symptoms is useful in reducing sufferers’ anxiety levels.
Research on expressed emotion has shown that certain aspects of family life can affect the course of schizophrenia. This has led to the development of various family intervention programmes. Central to these programmes is the emphasis on inclusion and sharing information. The treatment involves the whole family, not just the member with SZ, with the family becoming the patient’s support network. It is usually between 9 months and a year, allowing family to develop skills that can be continued afterwards.
Aims:
Improve positive and decrease negative forms of communication
Increase tolerance levels and decrease criticism
Decrease feelings of guilt and responsibility for causing the illness amongst family member
outline the aims of CBT?
cognitive restructuring via ABCDE framework. Identifying activating event (A), exploring beliefs (B), recognising consequences (C), disputing irrational beliefs (D), restructured belief (E).
To discover that we all have inherent tendencies to certain negative thoughts that evoke unhappiness and disturbance - especially in response to particular trigger situations.
To help the patient to identify delusions.
To challenge and modify delusory beliefs (make irrational thoughts rational). To challenge those delusions by looking at evidence. To help the patient to begin to test the reality of the evidence.
Recognise negative thoughts. Once patients accept that fact, they can learn to spot these negative thoughts as they arise, and then challenge and re-think them. To trace back the symptoms to get a better idea of how they developed
Evaluate the context of the patients delusions and hallucinations by considering ways to test the validity of their faulty beliefs
Set behavioural assignments to improve general levels of functioning (e.g increasing social activity)
Let the patient develop their own alternatives to their previous maladaptive behaviour by looking at coping strategies and alternative explanations.
explain a study to support CBT?
Zimmerman (2005) performed a meta analyses of 14 studies on CBT from 1990 to 2004 and found CBT significantly reduced positive symptoms and that treatment was especially beneficial to those suffering short term acute schizophrenic episode
outline family relationship therapy?
Research on expressed emotion has shown that certain aspects of family life can affect the course of schizophrenia. This has led to the development of various family intervention programmes. Central to these programmes is the emphasis on inclusion and sharing information. The treatment involves the whole family, not just the member with SZ, with the family becoming the patient’s support network. It is usually between 9 months and a year, allowing family to develop skills that can be continued afterwards.
Aims:
Improve positive and decrease negative forms of communication
Increase tolerance levels and decrease criticism
Decrease feelings of guilt and responsibility for causing the illness amongst family member