Systems Engineering for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - Part 2. Flashcards
Advantages of rotorcrafts
Ability to hover.
VTOL.
Disadvantages of rotorcrafts.
Poor efficiency in forward flight.
Complexity/ high maintenance costs.
Advantages of multicopter
- Simple design + control.
- Very good torque compensation.
- High maneuverability
Disadvantages of multicopter.
- Reduced efficiency.
Main modelling assumptions for quadcopters
Aerodynamics:
* Interaction with ground or other surfaces is neglected
* Fuselage/frame drag is neglected
* Propeller wake interactions are neglected
Structure:
* The structure is rigid and symmetric
* Propellers are rigid
What are the 3 parts of modelling a quadcopter?
Input to system are commanded rotor speeds.
1. Motor dynamics (due to fast dynamics wrt body dynamics, the motor dynamics are often neglected for control design).
2. Propeller aerodynamics - Aerodynamic forces and moments.
3. Rigid body dynamics - Translational and rotational accelerations
Modelling assumptions for the propeller dynamics in a quadcopter?
- Infinitely thin propeller/rotor disc area π΄
- Thrust and velocity distributions are uniform over disc area (One dimensional flow analysis)
- Quasi-steady airflow: Flow properties do not change over time
- No viscous effects: No profile drag
- Air is incompressible
Rigid-body dynamics modeling assumptions for quadcopters
- The structure is rigid and symmetric
- We only consider quadrotor near hover condition
- Main forces and moments come from propellers:
- Depend on flight regime (hover or translational flight)
- In hover: thrust and drag proportional to propeller speed squared ππ^2
Assumptions for controlling a quadcopter
- Neglect motor dynamics.
- Low speeds
- Only propeller aerodynamic forces considered - neglect frame drag.
- Linearisation around small attitude angles.
Advantages of flapping-wings MAVs
- Mini potential.
- Power-efficiency at low Re numbers.
- Manoeuvrability, agility
- Hover-capability
- Extensive flight envelope.
Applications of flapping wing MAVs
β’ Search & rescue, disaster response
β’ Monitoring & surveillance
β’ Infrastructure maintenance
β’ Data gathering
β’ Operations in human proximity
Flapping insect vs. plane
β Hover and VTOL capable
β More manoeuvrable &
versatile
β High performance at small
scales
Advantages and disadvantages of two wings against 4 wings
Ad:
- Less complex physics.
- Easier design + construction.
Dis:
- Wing motion causes large inertial oscillations, so less convenient for cameras.
- Less wing area - higher wing loading - so high flap frequency.
Advantages and disadvantages of four wings against 2 wings.
Ad:
- Additional lift production. - lower wing loading needed.
A) Tandem:
Highly manoeuvrable
But:
difficult to mimic in robotic flyers and highly complex.
B) X-Wing:
Opposite-phase flapping reduces body oscillations - stabler motion, suitable for cameras. And can use clap-and-fling which enhances lift.
But smaller flap amplitude because the wing pairs flap in the same plane.
Ad and disad Flapping wing MAVs with a tailplane
Advantages:
β Passive stability (in most flight conditions), hence simpler control
β Simpler flapping mechanism, typically 1 DOF (degree of freedom)
β Overall lower complexity, which allows for research on higher-level problems
Dis:
Γ Less manoeuvrability than wing-controlled FWMAVs
Γ Higher sensitivity to perturbations, e.g. wind gusts
Γ Forces produced by control surfaces are proportional to flight velocity squared (π^2); therefore steering
capability is limited at low flight speeds
Ad and disad Flapping wing MAVs without a tailplane
β Higher manoeuvrability
β Smaller and lighter designs possible
β Higher resilience to wind gusts
Γ More complex flapping mechanisms
Γ More complex control
Γ Active stabilisation required
What are the challenges with flapping wing MAVs
- multibody, time-varying system.
- high complexity.
- unsteady aerodynamics
- nonlinear systems: wide range of flight behaviours.
- small scale.
Explain the bird-like MAVs
Fast flight
passive upstroke
almost no force produced.
- Wing AOA and area are reduced during upstroke, so that much less force is produced thatn downstroke.
Explain the insect-like MAVs
Slow flight/ hover
Active upstroke
Useful lift produced.
Rapid flying and the flap-induced speed at the wing tip is greater than the forward speed.
During upstroke, the wings are reoriented so that the lower wing surface acts as aerodynamic upper
surface and produces lift.
Explain hovering
- Most power-demanding flight regime
- No forward flight velocity, all forces are due to flapping
- Horizontal forces cancel out between upstroke and downstroke
- Two typical wing patterns for hovering:
- Normal hovering
- Inclined-stroke hovering
Flapping wing aerodynamics
- Free-stream circulation.
- Rotational circulation.
- Delayed stall and leading edge vortex.
- Wing wake interaction.
- Added mass
- Clap-and-fling
What is the reduced frequency for flapping wings
A measure of unsteadiness
Define quasi-steady modelling
Assume the instantaneous forces on a flapping wing are equal to the forces that would act on a wing moving steadily at the same free-stream velocity and angle of attack.
Acceptable when k <0.1, and high flapping frequency compared to the body natural frequency
What are the 3 challenges that come with modelling FWMAV dynamics?
- Multi body system.
- Time-varying system (the system responds differently to the same input at different times)
- Nonlinearity
- Experimental data for flapping-wing MAVs
Define the time scale separation principle
The body dynamics and flapping dynamics are assumed to be decoupled because they are characterised by
very different frequencies. Hence averaging over the flap cycle can be used to cancel out time-varying effects.
Explain tethered experiments for MAVs
β Accurate monitoring of test conditions; repeatability
β Reduced impact of external factors
β Feasible before FWMAV is able to fly
Γ Clamping hinders oscillations that would occur in free
flight: can lead to erroneous force measurements
Γ Only steady state
Explain free-flight experiments for MAVs
β Realistic conditions: free, unconstrained body
β Can include manoeuvres
Γ Body oscillations affect on-board sensors
Γ Unstable platforms are difficult to control
Γ Difficult to replicate test conditions
Γ Flight-capable vehicle is needed
How to make simplifications for time varying dynamics - MAVs
Most controllers are designed based on time-averaged dynamics
* Most controllers do not allow for inputs to change within the flap cycle
How to make simplifications for nonlinear dynamics, wide flight envelope - MAVs
- Many controllers are based on linearised dynamics models
- Most control work only considers a single flight condition
How to make simplifications for real-life implementation - MAVs
- Small scale: limited computational power, sensing, power
- Often unstable systems: tuning in flight is problematic
- Many controllers are only tested in simulation
How is actuation split between the wing and the tailplane?
Wings: provide lift and thrust.
Tail - Manouvering, pitch and yaw.
Advantages and disadvantages for fixed-wing UAVs
Ad:
Flight range
Flight speed
Mechanical complexity
Cost
Disad:
Takeoff and landing infrastructure
No hovering
Modelling assumptions for fixed wing UAVs
- Rigid and symmetric structure:
Constant and (almost) diagonal inertia tensor - Constant mass
- Motor dynamics neglected
- Aerodynamics (main assumptions):
- Linear (operate below stall)
- Neglect fuselage lift/sideslip force
- Neglect propeller wake and main wing (or tail) interaction
3 main parts of the fixed-wing model
Input u to the system are commanded servo actuator and rotor speeds or the input voltages into the motors.
- Motor and servo dynamics block.
- Wing and propulsion aerodynamics.
- Rigid body dynamics.