Syllogisms Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning?

A

In each deductive reasoning the premises either do or do not contain conclusive arguments for the truth of the conclusion. If deductive reasoning is valid, it can in no way be invalid, and vice versa. If it is valid, the reasoning is conclusive and its conclusion is inevitable rather only having a degree of probability. The conclusion is not just plausible but imperative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does ‘M’ mean?

A

Middle term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does ‘S’ mean?

A

Subject of the conclusion; also called the minor term because of the premise in which it occurs: the second premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does ‘P’ mean?

A

predicate of the conclusion; also called the major term, and this term is adopted for the first premise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the standard format of the syllogism diagrams look like?

A

The first premise is always the one which contains the predicate of the conclusion (P); the second premise is the one which contains the subject of the conclusion (S).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Principle of non-contradiction

A

Something cannot be (a certain way) and at the same time not be (a certain way).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is important about the middle term?

A

There is only such a connecting concept (the middle term) if it means exactly the same in the one context as in the other.
-> The syllogism is valid only if the middle term has its own identity and is related in the same capacity to each of the two other terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can syllogisms be invalid?

A

a) The incorrect use of negation: Poor people are not happy. Rich people are not poor. Therefore, rich people are happy.
b) A shift in the field of reality to which a term refers: Some Turks are Europeans. Some Turks are Asians. Therefore, some Asians are Europeans.
c) An ambiguity in a term: What thou has not lost, thou hast. Thou has not lost thy horns. Ergo, thou hast horns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

First rule

A

There must be three terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Second rule

A

No term must have greater extension in the conclusion than it does in the premises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Third rule

A

The conclusion must not contain the middle term.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fourth rule

A

The middle term must be universal at least once.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fifth term

A

Two positive premises cannot yield a negative conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sixth Rule

A

Two negative premises yield nothing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Seventh rule

A

The conclusion is negative if one of the premise is negative and is particular if one of the premises is particular.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Eight rule

A

Two particular premises yield nothing.

17
Q

Quaternio Terminorum

A

(fourth term) error that arises because of ambiguities. These fallacies always involve a subtle shift in the context of the terms employed, so that at the end of the reasoning we are no longer talking about the same thing as at the start

18
Q

What is the simplest syllogism diagram?

A

M a P
S a M
S a P

19
Q

BARBARA

A

three times universally affirmative

20
Q

Celarent

A

twice universally negative, once affirmative
M e P
S a M
S e P

21
Q

Darii

A

M a P
S i M
S i P

22
Q

Ferio

A

M e P
S i M
S o P

23
Q
A