Suture Materials Flashcards
absorbable monofilament suture
Polydioxanone - PDS
Polyglyconate - Maxon
Poliglecaprone 25 - Monocryl
Glycomer 631 - Biosyn
Caprosyn
absorbable multifilament
Polyglycolic Acid - Dexon
Polyglactin 910 - Vicryl & Vicryl Rapide
Glycolide/Lactide Copolymer - Polysorb
non-absorbable monofilament
Polyamide - Nylon (Ethilon, Dermalon, Monosof)
Polypropylene (Prolene, Surgipro, Surgilene)
Polybutester (Novafil)
Steel
Gore-Tex (polytetrafluoroethylene)
non-absorbable multifilament
Silk
Polymerized caprolactam (Vetafil, Supramide (Braunamide))
Polyester (Dacron, Ticron, Mersilene, Ethibond)
Polyethylene (Fiberwire, Ultrabraid, Nespron)
what are the 2 natural sutures
surgical gut
silk
surgical steel
pros:
cons:
example sx:
pros: minimal tissue reaction, stable in contaminated/infected wounds, excellent knot security
cons: inflam reaction to knot ends
sternal closure
surgical gut
pros:
cons:
pros: broken down by phagocytosis, inexpensive
cons: marked inflam reaction, poor knot security if wet, tissue drag/poor handling, unpredictable loss of strength and rate of absorption
silk
pros:
cons:
pros: excellent handling
cons: does not maintain tensile strength after 6 mo, avoid in contaminated sites, essentially non-absorbable > 2 yr
what are the absorbable monofilament sutures pros and cons
pros:
-minimal tissue reaction
-consistent times for tensile strength loss/absorption
-broken down by hydrolysis
-good knot security
cons: stiff, poor handling
Maxon (polyglyconate) & PDS II (polydioxanone)
significant tensile strength loss:
complete absorption:
sig loss of tensile strength 4-5 weeks
complete absorption 180 day (6 mo)
Biosyn (Glycomer 631) & Monocryl (poliglecaprone 25)
significant tensile strength loss:
complete absorption:
significant tensile strength loss 2-3 weeks
complete absorption 3 months
3 types of synthetic absorbable multifilament
dexon (polyglycolic acid)
vicryl (polyglactin 910)
polysorb (glycolide/lactide)
synthetic absorbable multifilament
pros:
minimal tissue reaction
consistent times for tensile strength loss
broken down by hydrolysis
good knot security
faster absorption than monofilaments
high capillarity
excellent handling
synthetic absorbable multifilament
cons:
rate of degradation increases with infection
Vicryl
tensile strength loss:
complete absorption:
50% at 21 days
complete absorption - 60 days
ANTIBACTERIAL