Sustainability definitions and viewpoints Flashcards
What is sustainable development?
Meeting the needs of today without compromising the future of the next generation.
What is sustainable development? (In terms of triple bottom line)
sustainable development involves the simultaneous pursuit of economic prosperity, environmental quality and social equity. Companies aiming for sustainability need to perform not against a single, financial bottom line but against the triple bottom line
What are the two pespective on the current political situation?
rspective on the current political situation: Reformist & Radical
Reformist – current political system isn’t broken just needs to be tweaked to solve our environmental problems
Radical – current political system is broken and needs big change to sort it out
What are the two ways in which you can see environmental challenges?
Prosaic - Problem to get through
Imaginative - Opportunity to do things differently
What are the four main viewpoint?
1) Prosaic and reformist: (problem solving discourse)
2) Prosiac and Radical: (Survivalism)
3) Reformist and imaginative (sustainability)
4) Radical and imaginative (green radicalism)
Sustainability definition (ecological)
avoidance of the depletion of natural resources in order to maintain an ecological balance.
What is to be sustained? (3)
Nature: earth, bio diversity, eco system
Life: ecosystems services, resources, environment
Community: cultures, groups, places
What needs to be developed? (3)
Economy: wealth, productivity, consumption
People: life expextancy, education, social equity
Society: social capital, security
What is corporate greenwash? give examples
greenwashing when a company or organization spends more time and money claiming to be “green” through advertising and marketing than actually implementing business practices that minimize environmental impact. Green is big business!
- Chevon advert in the 1980s
- Lays natural potato chips - no different!
- Ben & Jerry’s 20 year mission - not using organic milk
What is the promethean response?
- No real environmental problem – often don’t believe in climate change
- Or if they do believe – not as bad as scientists are making it out to be or -it’s not humanities fault, natural planet cycle
- Market forces will naturally sort out our problems - depletion of resources will result in higher prices reducing demand and push for a search for alternatives. Therefore, no government intervention is need. Keep regulation away
- Innovation and business will solve our problems without any stimulus – it’s not that bad
Describe the prosaic response and include the 3 types
- They believe some intervention is needed (pragmatic and focused)
- Focus on solving well-bounded environmental problems
- They do it with the socioeconomic system that we currently have
1) Administrative rationalism
2) Democratic pragmatism
2) Economic rationalism
Describe administrative rationalism and it’s challenges (5)
- Experts work out what should be done
- Politicians put in place what needs to be done to make it happen – state has the best interest of people and business
- Certain standards must be met – been very good for air pollution and water pollution
- Tools used are environmental impact assessment and possibly cost benefit analysis
Challenges: complex problem across borders and making sure companies follow the rules
Describe democratic pragmatism (3), give an example (1) and provide challenge (2)
- Interactive problem solving within the basic institutional structure of liberal capitalist democracy – consensus of balancing needs
- People don’t trust the experts - Public consultations, policy dialog, public inquiry
- Civic society should be involved in the problem solving process to have democratic legitimacy
- Example – incinerators. Placed in poor areas because of low prices. Local people felt used – kicked off – needed to be involved
- Problems - Can be co-opted by the powerful - co-opted by those who are most passionate and have time
Define economic rationalism, give an example, solution, and challenge
- Primarily view environmental problems as mechanisms economic problems – externalities
- E.G. Tragedy of the commons – over use free resources such as assuming trees will take our co2 no problem. It’s free to pump out CO2 therefore people will continue to do this – Tax?
- Solution: Define property rights over externalities such a the right to emit CO2, to catch fill or use landfill. Place cap. Create market to allow for these things to be traded.
- Problem Takes the view society is made up of rational self-interested people -Governments roles is to make markets
Describe survivalism
- Inevitable limits to growth of humanity by the carrying capacity of the biosphere - Stocks of resources are limited
- Need to move to a steady state economy: stop population growth, economic development
- International coordination by governments is needed
- Negative view of humanity