Sustainability Flashcards

1
Q

What are the different mental models of sustainability?

A
  • Efficiency
    • Inter shift shut down focus: no production no energy use
    • Cement can be 20% more efficient with same costs
    • 10,000 litres vs 60 for a pair of jeans
  • Value
    • Fast fashion: use a small interchangeable wardrobe
    • Fire hose handbag
  • Technology
  • System
    • AB sugar
    • Mallorca
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is eco efficiency?

A

Simply do more with less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Factories making the same product can show large variation in operational efficiencies.

Outline the factors which may influence variations in resource efficiency.

Suggest ways in which resource efficiencies may be improved. Use specific examples, from module presentations or from your own experience, to illustrate your answer.

A

Improvement hierarchy:

  • Prevention
    • eliminate unnecessary equipment/processes
    • switch off equipment when not in use
    • e.g. use gravity feeds, standby mode
  • Waste reduction
    • good maintenance and repair
    • sort/treat waste to optimise its value
    • optimise layout
    • e.g. fix leaks, insulate, separate waste, keep equipment clean
  • Resource use reduction
    • optimise production schedule and start up
    • match supply and demand
    • e.g. lower compressed air pressure, use highest temp for cold storage
  • Reuse of waste as a resource
    • look for compatible waste demand
    • understand reuse opportunities
    • e.g. reuse cutting fluid, recover waste heat and water
  • Substitution
    • replace resource (renewable and non toxic)
    • change way function is achieved
    • e.g. replace cutting tools, install optimum motors, replace obsolete tech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the circular economy?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the waste and energy hierarchy and how these feed into the improvement hierarchy

A

Waste hierarchy:

  • Avoid
  • Reduce
  • Reuse/recycle
  • Treatment
  • Energy recover
  • Landfill

Energy hierarchy:

  • Minimise demand
  • Energy efficiency
  • Renewable source
  • Low carbon technology
  • Carbon offsetting
  • Conventional energy

Improvement:

  • Prevent
  • Reduce waste
  • Reduce resource use
  • Reuse waste as a resource
  • Substitute, upgrade, replace
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Briefly outline how LCA and Eco-Audit should be carried out. What information is required?

A

LCA:

  • Define goal and scope of study.
  • Define
    • the functions of the product system,
    • functional unit,
    • boundaries and
    • product system.
  • Define methodology, assumptions and limitations.
  • Perform inventory analysis.
  • Assign environmental impacts of product system.
  • Interpret results.

Eco-audit:

User inputs include

  • Bill of materials,
  • shaping processes,
  • transport needs,
  • duty cycle.

The Eco database is used to generate embodied energies, process energies, CO2 footprints, unit transport energies etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is sustainable development? Define the methodology.

A

Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.

1a. Define objectives, size, time and geographical scale
1b. Identify key design issues and appropriate metrics
* Metrics: e.g. energy generation per unit mass
2. Identify stakeholders and their concerns/power
3. Fact finding: material efficient design, resource efficient design
4. Synthesis: assess data and analyse against three Ps (planet, profit, people)
5. Reflection: is this sustainable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a system boundary? Discuss what factors should be considered when defining a system boundary for environmental analysis of plastic film packaging for cheese produced and consumed in the UK.

A
  • A system boundary is used to define what should be included for a particular environmental analysis. For this case, the following factors should be considered:

Packaging:

  • Material production, manufacturing process, transport between different stages. End-of-life disposal.

Supply chain issues:

  • The weight and volume of the packaging and how it affects the density with which the product can be packed for transport.

The analysis is of the packaging, so the production of the product being packaged (cheese) is outside the boundary. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of the packaging has implications for the shelf-life (lifetime) of the product.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

With reference to the use of LCA for the production of biodiesel, outline the meaning and significance of the terms system boundary and allocation.

A

The system boundary defines what is included in the LCA. Although the protocol is documented, it is subject to interpretation. For biodiesel, there will be variation in the extent to which growing of the crops is included, and how the agricultural systems are treated.

Allocation: Any process involves many systems, which are not independent. Allocation is the appropriate distribution of responsibility for resource consumption, emissions and wastes from processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define what an LCA might aim to achieve.

A

LCA is aimed at providing a measure of the total environmental impact of the kettle, from material production, manufacture, use and disposal. It is particularly useful for comparing the impacts of products, as much like-for-like as possible. For a kettle, one might compare different materials or production technologies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Compare

LCA with Eco Audit for a kettle

A

LCA (life cycle analysis) provides outputs under headings of

  • resource consumption (including materials, energy, water),
  • emissions (including various gases, particulates),
  • and impact assessment (including ozone depletion, global warming, acidification, human toxicity).

These different factors cannot readily be combined, so are usually left as separate datapoints.

There is currently no single method for conducting an LCA, but ISO14040 is an international standard which sets out a framework.

  • It is a systematic way of analysing the impact of an activity or producing a product.
  • It considers all phases of the lifecycle.
  • It is useful for comparing the impacts of comparable activities (e.g. two ways of making a product).

LCA is expensive, time-consuming, does have subjective elements, and is retrospective (normally too late to influence design).

For the kettle, the outputs will include all those noted above (maybe in subcategories as well). It may be noted that most of the impact comes from the use phase.

Eco-audit provides a single measure of impact, which may be energy or CO2.

This is generated under the headings of

  • Material, Manufacture, Transport, Use and Disposal and usually presented as a bar chart.

In addition a summary is generated showing detailed breakdown, life phase energies, life carbon footprints.

  • Eco-audit provides a quick and approximate measure of one aspect of environmental impact.
  • Does not take full account of other eco factors which are included in full LCA.

The following factors may be noted:

  • gaseous emissions (e.g. SOX, NOX), particulates, ozone depletion potential, acidification potential, human toxicity potential.
  • Water use is another big factor which may increasingly become a show-stopper.

It identifies the dominant life phase so allowing a targeted approach to reducing environmental impact. It is done early enough in the design process to influence design.

For the kettle, the use phase dominates, so the biggest improvement may be made by improving thermal insulation of the kettle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain how you would use an Eco-Audit to make recommendations on how to reduce the environmental impact of a refrigerator. Give a prioritised list of proposals to achieve this, justifying your answer. What assumptions are made in performing the analysis?

A
  • The eco-audit will generate a bar chart in which the dominant phase is the duty cycle, followed by the material.
  • Increasing the operating efficiency of the fridge to reduce energy consumption will be the main recommendation.
  • This will be achieved primarily by improving thermal insulation, though note that this will also increase the impact of the Materials phase.
  • There may be scope within the design of the fridge for reducing the heat transfer when the fridge door is open – e.g. compartments in the fridge to retain the cold.
  • Optimising the efficiency of the cooling mechanism is something else to be done – but there may not be much improvement possible there.
  • There may be scope for encouraging good behaviour by incorporating alarms that sound if the fridge door is left open.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define what an LCA might aim to achieve.

A

LCA is aimed at providing a measure of the total environmental impact of the kettle, from material production, manufacture, use and disposal. It is particularly useful for comparing the impacts of products, as much like-for-like as possible. For a kettle, one might compare different materials or production technologies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Briefly describe how an eco-audit of a plastic film packaging for cheese would be carried out.

What are the outputs of such an analysis?

What assumptions might you expect to make in carrying out the assessment?

How would you use the analysis to propose reduction in the environmental impact of the packaging?

Identify any additional factors relevant to environmental impact assessment which should be considered that are not included in this analysis.

A

User inputs include

  • Bill of materials,
  • shaping processes,
  • transport needs,
  • duty cycle.

The Eco database is used to generate

  • embodied energies,
  • process energies,
  • CO2 footprints,
  • unit transport energies etc.

The eco-audit can be facilitated using CES. Assumptions may typically include details of the materials used.

Outputs include a bar-chart showing impact of the four lifecycle phases: material, manufacture, transport and use, plus end-of-life.
The analysis should be used to identify the phase with the greatest impact, and to focus on this for action.

Additional factors:

  • In assessing the wider environmental consequences of food packaging, the domination of the food production aspect should be remembered.
  • Not specifically mentioned are the factors associated with the function of food packaging in reducing food wastage, including the barrier function described under (a) (ii).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an LCA. What are the issues associated?

A

LCA: life cycle analysis

Issues

  • It is time consuming, expensive and subjective.
  • Too late in the design process. Detail only in retrospect.
  • Need a simple approach. Choose a single metric e.g. carbon dioxide generated or energy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is a CES eco audit carried out?

A

Choose the life phase which dominates:

  • materials, manufacture, transport, use or disposal
17
Q

Outline the outputs that will be generated from such an analysis. What are the difficulties with using these outputs?

A

Outputs can be generated under nine environmental themes (students were not expected to remember details for these, but they are stated here for completeness):

  • Abiotic depletion potential;
  • Energy depletion potential;
  • Global warming potential;
  • Ozone depletion potential;
  • aquatic/terrestrial ecotoxicity;
  • acidification potential;
  • human toxicity;
  • photochemical oxidant creation;
  • nitrification potential.

All have different metrics, so combining them is not straightforward. Most studies choose only some of the headings, and tend to keep the figures separate under them. Assessment of impact therefore requires some judgment, such as which metrics are most important.

The choice of system boundaries is crucially important in any LCA. There is some flexibility about how this is done, so it is important that similar system boundary choices have been made when making comparisons between different LCAs. Similar care should be taken over allocation and choice of functional unit.

18
Q

What are the main elements in a business model?

A

Value proposiiton

Value creation

Value capture

19
Q

Explain the concept of value uncaptured?

A

Value captured: the benefits delivered to stakeholders either or not related to monetary profit, e.g. improved energy efficiency

Value uncaptured:

  • Value missed: value inadequately captured or lost,
    • e.g. not using specialist knowledge, inefficient use of data
  • Value destroyed: negative outcomes of business,
    • e.g. pollution, bad working conditions
  • Value surplus: redundant value that is larger than requirements
    • e.g. over capacity of labour, excess functionality
  • Value absent: value which is required but has not been created
    • e.g. lack of skills, lack of warehouse space, unmet customer needs

Value opportunity: the new opportunities of additional value creation through new activities and relationships, e.g. the opportunity to utilise identified waste

Stakeholders must be considered:

  • Investors, environment, society, employees, suppliers, customers

The concept of value uncaptured is used to understand failed value exchanges among multiple stakeholders across a business network to uncover new value opportunities.

20
Q

Give examples of sustainable business models

A

Formula E

Dutjahn Sandalwood Oils

Elvis & Kresse

21
Q

Explain the steps of the value mapping process

A

Steps 1, 2 and 3 – Setting the scene

  • Decide the unit of analysis (product/service, business unit, company or an industry)
  • Add or modify any missing stakeholders
  • Identify the purpose of the unit of analysis

Steps 4, 5 and 6 –

  • Map the value (follow the spiral, clockwise) current value captured for each stakeholder
  • Value uncaptured, i.e. value missed / destroyed / surplus / absence for each stakeholder
  • Stakeholder tensions may arise

Step 7 – Generate value opportunities for sustainability

  • Eliminate value destroyed and absence - reducing the value uncaptured, turning it into positive value
  • Utilise value missed and surplus – reusing the value uncaptured, increasing value in the business network
  • Look for value opportunities – extending the value captured, shifting to higher value added
22
Q

Explain the different waste streams that are utilised and sold in AB sugar

A
  • Molasses and Bagasse made into:
    • Alcohol
    • Biofuel
    • Furfural: fungicide/weed killer
    • Betaine: used for young salmons
  • Pulp and lime made into:
    • Salts
    • Raffinate and Vinasse: animal feed
  • Water, effluent and soil made into:
    • Algae and topsoil
  • CHP, heat and CO2 made into:
    • Power generation
    • Tomatoes/marijuana
    • Biogas
23
Q

Explain riversimple’s 7 point strategy

A
  1. Network electric car
  2. Sale of service not cars
  3. Sale of service upstream
  4. City by city strategy
  5. Distributed manufacturing
  6. Open source designs
  7. Shared ownership
24
Q

Define microplastics and their issues for marine life

A

Defined as any piece of plastic less than 5mm in length, but often less than 0.5mm (small enough to evade standard filtration systems)

Origins include:

synthetic fibres (from washing clothing); microbeads from cosmetics and personal care products; partially broken-down waste plastics

Issues:

Larger bits:

  • Suffocation, entanglement.
  • Sharp edges particularly when ingested

Smaller fragments (sub-millimeter):

  • Mistaken for food so can cause starvation
  • Unexpected effect: mimic oestrogen, disrupts reproductive ability in fish and causes infertility

Additives from processing and product requirements are released from polymer waste (and during a product’s useful life…)

Additives leach out and contaminate fluids: can mimic oestrogen and disrupt reproductive ability in animals and fish so impacting food supplies. But can also cause hormone-related problems in consumers (including humans)

25
Q

What are the functions of primary packaging?

A
  • Mechanical protection:
    • damage reduction (impact, surface damage from handling)
  • Acts as barrier layer:
    • keeps oxygen out (vacuum packs); keeps protective atmospheres in (typically nitrogen or carbon dioxide); prevents water loss
  • Increases product shelf life:
    • reduces food wastage can reduce amount of processing and additives increases acceptable length of supply chain (global food production)
  • Hygiene; environmental barrier, keeps smells in
  • Tamper evidence:
    • Provides assurance that the product is intact and is as produced by the manufacturer (right product, right quality, right quantity)
  • Information, advertising and legislation
26
Q

What is the production footprint like compared to packaging footprint?

A

Packaging footprint tiny compared with food production footprint. Recycling saves a little energy, but there are other reasons for recycling

27
Q

Could we use a single polymer for cheese production?

A

Carbon footprint is minimised by using multi-layer film

Best single polymer is PVDC – but it’s difficult to recycle and expensive

Best easily recyclable polymer is PET.

28
Q

Discuss the impacts on the lifecycle (positive and negative) of including a barrier function in packaging.

A

Environmental impacts:

  • Product life increased by orders of magnitude, so (simplistically) reduces wastage.
  • But the lengthening of the supply chain promotes globalisation of food production, with both positive and negative environmental consequences (factors include transport, agricultural policies and impacts).
  • The complexity of packaging material may in some cases be increased if a barrier function is included (e.g. as an additional polymer layer in cheese packaging, or with metallised films), reducing recyclability.
  • Considering packaged food as a whole, the environmental impact of the food production hugely dominates the total impact.
  • So the impact of the packaging itself is normally considerably less than 5% of the total impact, and any end-of-life considerations are (in terms of energy or carbon footprint) negligible.
29
Q

What happens to polymers at end of life?

A

Disposal:

  • Mechanical recycling
    • Sort, shred, clean, melt/reprocess (extrusion, pressing)
    • Primary Recycling (closed-loop):
      • Standard practice in factories e.g. Out-of-spec low-density polythene (LDPE) injection mouldings are pelletised and immediately returned to injection moulder input
    • Secondary Recycling (post-consumer):
      • Involves downcycling e.g. fleeces and other clothing from PET bottles, (Patagonia) household waste bags from LDPE
    • Sorting is important. Commonly used automated methods:
      • near-infra-red spectroscopy; optical recognition; electrostatics; X-ray fluorescence; density methods including flotation; melting point
  • Composting
  • Feedstock/chemical recycling
    • Polymers broken down into constituent monomers which can be used in refineries or in petrochemical production
    • Plants are very large and costly; processing energy is high
    • Useful for specialist applications (e.g. process for recycling tetrapaks)
  • Other (grinding for filler)
  • Energy recovery
  • Landfill
30
Q

Why are polymers so difficult to recycle?

A
  • Quality of input material is critically important to value of output
  • Polymers cannot be refined or purified: everything that goes into the mechanical recycling process is incorporated into the output recycled material
  • Difficult to analyse polymers to know exactly what is in them

Ideal input:

  • single polymer:
    • polymers cannot be defined by simple chemical formula: properties depend on chain length, chain configuration (branched or linear chain, position of side groups)
  • clean
    • Not mixed with other materials (e.g. metal, paper).
    • Not contaminated by food, or by anything else (e.g. bottle used for bleach)
      • Polymers contain small amounts of many different additives to improve processing to stabilise against environment in service: includes UV, fire resistance
  • uncoloured
31
Q

How can polymer recycling be increased?

A
  • Government subsidies
    • Legislation forcing increased recycling – e.g. required minimum recycled content in products
    • Oil prices rise, so re-processed polymer becomes more valuable
  • Design for recyclability:
    • Narrower range of polymers
    • Think about joining methods
    • Use sub-optimised material (but increases weight of article, uses more material)
    • No coloured plastics
  • Advances in recycling technology to produce higher-grade higher-value material
    • Improved sorting
    • Better tolerance of impurities in mechanically recycled plastics
      e. g. Using calcium carbonate to react with chlorine from PVC
    • Processing of mixed plastics
      e. g. Research into compatibilising mixed polymers
    • More chemical recycling
32
Q

Should you use paper and cardboard or a polymer for packaging?

A

Paper & card have greater impact than plastic.

Environmental footprint of paper/card is high:

Manufacturing operations very energy-intensive (turning trees into chips, processing; needs 60% more energy than plastics) and generate much more toxic waste than plastics (water pollutants 50x higher; air pollutants 70% higher).

End-of-life: plastics recycling requires only 10% energy of paper/card recycling.

Conclusion: All single-use disposable packaging is environmentally undesirable.

Expectation: Transition to re-usable plastic crates, charging a deposit.

33
Q

What should we do about plastic packaging?

A

Knee-jerk reactions:

  • Get rid of plastic packaging
  • Ban all single-use plastic

Superficially plausible but problematic:

  • Use bio-based, biodegradable polymers

More considered reactions:

  • Stop using un-necessary plastics (and packaging)
    • Packaging directive: eliminate all ‘avoidable plastics waste’ by 2042
  • More packaging re-use
    • Returnable bottles, re-fillable containers
    • Barriers: logistics, infrastructures
      • standardised designs: needs support from marketing people
      • safety, hygiene, product assurance and quality control
      • consumer preferences
  • Materials choices: all packaging should be recyclable
  • Increase recycling: build UK recycling capacity
  • Stop uncontrolled exports
  • More energy from waste but only as a temporary measure

Correctly used and disposed, plastic reduces food waste; carbon footprint of packaging is tiny compared with food production

34
Q

For each sustainable business model (Riversimple and Vitsoe), describe what forms of sustainable value are created, delivered and captured.

A

Basic answers will describe sustainable value as the integration of economic, environmental and social value into the business model, and identify generic forms of sustainable value such as:

  • Sustainable economic value - profit, growth, return on investment, financial resilience, long- term viability and stability.
  • Sustainable environmental value - use of renewable resources, low emissions and low waste levels within the ability of the environment to metabolise safely, pollution prevention (air, water, land), protection of bio-diversity, positive benefits to the environment.
  • Sustainable social value - secure and meaningful livelihoods, fair labour standards and practices, well-being, health, community development, poverty alleviation, social justice, equality, diversity.

Good answers will interpret and relate these forms of value to Riversimple and Vitsoe respectively, and identify company-specific forms of sustainable value.

In the case of Riversimple,

  • this might include seeking long-term financial resilience;
  • building a lightweight zero emissions vehicle;
  • open source design;
  • creating local jobs.

In the case of Vitsoei,

  • this might include prioritising long-term viability and stability over short-term growth;
  • a new eco-building to reduce energy use and emissions;
  • reusing all packaging;
  • trust between company and customers;
  • secure livelihoods of employees.

Good answers will also apply the concepts of value captured and value uncaptured (missed/destroyed/surplus/absence) to categorise different forms of sustainable value for the various stakeholders of company A and company B.

35
Q

For each company (Riversimple and Vitsoe), describe what a sustainable business model would look like

A

Basic answers will describe a sustainable business model as one that

  • creates, delivers and captures economic value
  • while maintaining or regenerating economic, natural and social resources beyond its organisational boundaries.

Principles that place sustainability at the core of the business, and define a sustainable business model include:

  • Re-thinking thepurpose of the business.
  • Adopting a broader meaning of valueto integrate economic, environmental and social value.
  • Considering a broader set of stakeholders beyond shareholders, customers and suppliers.
  • Including Natural Environment and Society as stakeholders of the firm.
  • Aligning interestsand encouraging responsible actions from all stakeholders.
  • Adopting a long-term and systems view of the business.

Good answers will interpret and relate these principles to Riversimple and Vitsoe respectively, and propose company-specific principles. In both cases, the sustainable business models would deviate from the traditional car-manufacturing and furniture-making models.

In the case of Riversimple,

  • this might include rethinking the purpose of the business to pursue the elimination of the environmental impact of personal transport;
  • open source designof the vehicle;
  • retaining ownership of the cars and selling mobility as a service where the service includes the car and all associated running costs, including fuel.

In the case of Vitsoe,

  • this might include rethinking the purpose of the business to allow more people to live with less, that lasts longer;
  • encouragingmore customersto buyless;
  • encouraging reuse of furnitureand modular upgrade over time;
  • considering repair, reuse, exchange, leasing and re-manufacture of furniture.
36
Q

Explain the novel features of each business model in comparison to the traditional business models of a car manufacturer and a furniture manufacturer.

A

Good answers will highlight innovations in the proposed sustainable business in comparison to the traditional business models of a car manufacturer and a furniture manufacturer. The answer to this question would build upon and reflect on the analysis performed in the previous two answers, as well as draw upon wider material from the module.

In the case of Riversimple, novel characteristics that highlight the differences to the traditional mainstream car manufacturing business model might include elements such as

  • selling service rather than selling the car;
  • a custodian company governance model;
  • and raising financial capital through crowdfunding.

In the case of Vitsoe, novel characteristics that highlight the differences to the traditional mainstream furniture manufacturing business model might include elements such as

  • avoiding built-in obsolescence in the products;
  • building long lasting relationships with customers by under-selling to them;
  • employee ownership of the company;
  • selling quietly with no marketing campaigns;
  • and raising investment from long-term customers.
37
Q

What is the circular economy?

A

The circular economy is one where

  • no materials are allowed to escape the value system, one implication of which is that no material can degrade over time (eg down-cycle from car steel to rebar steel).
  • This would require significant change in product designs to incorporate new materials (from old materials), changes in the supply chains, changes in the retail relationship with customers an changes to the waste system.
  • This qualifies as acting on the whole system.
38
Q

What measures should be considered for reducing food packaging waste whilst not compromising its global environmental impact?

A

Eco-aware measures for reducing food packaging waste might include:

  • reduction of non-functional packaging (already covered by existing legislation but difficult to enforce);
  • reducing packaging volume (films instead of trays - negative impact on recyclability);
  • making it easier for people to dispose of polymer waste to waste streams that can be recycled (uniform and clear national guidance across domestic and commercial waste disposal operatives);
  • increase national capability for recycling by providing subsidies to recycling companies.
  • More radical proposals look at reducing the range of polymers used for packaging, and this would require national/international agreement, such as using only a small number of uncoloured plastics.