Surgery Flashcards
A 17-year-old boy presented with high grade fever,
nausea, vomiting of ingested matter and flank pain
of three days duration. His temperature is 38.5°C,
and pulse rate is 100/min. However, other physical
examination findings are not remarkable. Laboratory
result is notable for leukocytosis and pyuria. What is
the most likely diagnosis of the boy?
• a. Acute cystitis
• b. Nephrolithiasis
C. Acute prostatitis
• d. Acute pylenophritis
D
Clinical features of lower UTI [19][20]
Irritative lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
Increased urinary frequency
Urinary urgency
Dysuria
Hematuria
Suprapubic tenderness
Clinical features of upper UTI (pyelonephritis) [21]
Symptoms of lower UTI
Fever
Flank pain
Costovertebral angle tenderness
Fatigue/malaise
Nausea and vomiting
See “Clinical features” in “Pyelonephritis.
The most likely diagnosis is:
d. Acute pyelonephritis
Explanation:
1. Clinical Presentation:
• High-grade fever, nausea, vomiting, and flank pain are characteristic of acute pyelonephritis, an infection of the kidney.
• The flank pain suggests involvement of the upper urinary tract.
2. Laboratory Findings:
• Leukocytosis indicates a systemic inflammatory response.
• Pyuria (white blood cells in the urine) points to a urinary tract infection, which supports the diagnosis.
3. Exclusion of Other Options:
• a. Acute cystitis: Typically presents with dysuria, frequency, urgency, and suprapubic pain, but without fever or systemic symptoms like nausea and vomiting.
• b. Nephrolithiasis: Usually causes severe, colicky flank pain, sometimes with hematuria, but fever and pyuria are uncommon unless there is a concurrent infection.
• c. Acute prostatitis: Uncommon in a 17-year-old. Symptoms typically include perineal pain, urinary retention, and systemic symptoms.
Conclusion:
The combination of systemic symptoms (fever, nausea) and localized findings (flank pain, pyuria) strongly supports acute pyelonephritis.
A 24-year-old male patient came to an emergency
OPD after he was injured at his back by an unknown
offender three hours back. He had minimal bleeding
from the stab site. On physical examination, he had
2 x 3cm deep laceration to his back, and the fascia
and peritoneum were intact. What is the most
appropriate management for the patient?
• a. Debridement, washing and primary closure
• b. Admit him, IV antibiotics and primary
c l o s u r e
• c. Wound care and delayed primary closure
• d. Wound care daily and let it close by itself
A , ( primary closure for wounds in recent, clean wound ,low risk of infection)
Primary wound closure
Definition: closure of recent wounds by approximation of the wound edges, allowing for healing by primary intention
Indications
Recent, clean wounds that have a low risk of infection
Procedure: See “Wound closure techniques.”
Antibiotics [14]
Minor, uncontaminated injuries: Antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely required.
Wounds at high risk of infection: Consider antibiotic prophylaxis.
Wound healing
Occurs by primary intention
Wound healing occurs with minimal inflammation and minimal to no granulation tissue formation.
Organ-specific tissue forms at the site of healing
Minimal (hairline) scar formation
Secondary wound closure
Definition: leaving a wound to heal by secondary intention (i.e., without approximating the wound edges)
Indications
Infected wounds, e.g., surgical site infection [15]
Wounds at high risk of infection, e.g., wounds with implanted foreign bodies [6]
Bite wounds that do not meet the criteria for primary closure (see “Bite wounds” for details)
Wounds older than the time frame within which primary closure can be safely performed.
Large wounds with irregular edges that cannot be approximated without tension
Goal: debridement to remove devitalized tissue; removal of contaminants and foreign bodies that may disrupt healing. [6]
Procedure [6]
Administer local, regional, or general anesthesia.
Clean via pressured irrigation using warm, isotonic saline. [6][16]
Perform surgical (sharp) debridement: removal of devitalized tissue and debris to allow for wound healing
Ensure drainage (e.g., silicone/rubber drains, strip of gauze) of deep wounds.
Apply moist dressing.
Immobilize the affected extremity, if necessary.
Further treatment
Wounds at high risk of infection: Consider antibiotic prophylaxis.
Infected wounds: Administer antibiotics (see “Empiric antibiotic therapy for skin and soft tissue infections”).
Regular dressing changes
Reevaluation for delayed primary closure (if needed) after ∼ 3 days
Consider negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) as an adjunct to stimulate the healing process for large wounds. [14][17]
Wound healing
Occurs by secondary intention
Usually accompanied with pronounced inflammation
Takes longer than wounds that have been repaired with primary closure
Requires the formation of granulation tissue
The wound bed is replaced with increased proliferation of fibroblasts.
Pronounced scar formation
Open wound drainage system
Tertiary wound closure (delayed primary closure)
Definition: surgical closure of a wound after healing by secondary intention has already begun; also known as healing by tertiary intention
Indications
Clean wounds with healthy edges in patients presenting after the time frame within which primary closure can be safely performed.
Contaminated wounds left to heal by secondary intention and with no signs of infection after 3–5 days [6]
Procedure
Clean the wound and debride any areas of devitalized tissue.
Close the wound using an appropriate wound closure technique (e.g., simple interrupted sutures).
Wound healing
Occurs by tertiary intention
Results in a larger scar than with primary or secondary closure due to an interruption in normal wound healing
A 22-year-old male patient presented with
progressive mid-abdominal discomfort followed by
anorexia, nausea and vomiting of 24 hours duration.
The pain later shifted to the right iliac fossa. He had
right lower quadrant abdominal tenderness and
WBC count of 12000/mm3 with left shift (NR; 3.54-
9.06 × 103/mm3). What is the ultrasound finding
that supports the most likely diagnosis?
• a. Presence of fluid in general peritoneum
• b. Length of appendix greater than 15mm
c. Presence of air in general peritoneum
• d. Diameter of appendix greater 6mm
Ultrasound findings — The most accurate ultrasound finding for acute appendicitis is an appendiceal diameter of >6 mm
The ultrasound finding that supports the most likely diagnosis is:
d. Diameter of appendix greater than 6mm
Explanation:
1. Clinical Presentation:
• The patient’s symptoms, including mid-abdominal pain shifting to the right iliac fossa, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and right lower quadrant tenderness, are classic for acute appendicitis.
• Leukocytosis with a left shift (increased neutrophils) supports an inflammatory or infectious process.
2. Ultrasound Findings in Appendicitis:
• The most reliable ultrasound finding for appendicitis is an appendiceal diameter greater than 6mm. This suggests inflammation or swelling of the appendix.
• Other findings can include:
• Non-compressible appendix.
• Increased echogenicity of surrounding fat (suggesting inflammation).
• Presence of periappendiceal fluid or an appendicolith (calcified deposit).
3. Exclusion of Other Options:
• a. Presence of fluid in the general peritoneum: This may indicate perforation with generalized peritonitis, which is a complication of appendicitis, but it is not the most common initial finding.
• b. Length of appendix greater than 15mm: The length of the appendix is not a diagnostic criterion for appendicitis.
• c. Presence of air in the general peritoneum: This suggests perforation and is a late finding, not typically seen in uncomplicated appendicitis.
Conclusion:
The diameter of the appendix greater than 6mm is the most specific and early ultrasound finding supporting the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
A 28-year-old male patient came to a health center
after noticing skin discoloration on his back for
unknown duration. Five hypo-pigmented skin lesions
with loss of sensation on the lesion and enlarged
ulnar nerves were found during examination. What is
the most likely diagnosis?
• a. Leprosy
• b. Ulnar nerve neuropathy
• c. Tinea corporis
• d. Pityriasis alba
The most likely diagnosis is:
a. Leprosy
Explanation:
1. Key Clinical Features:
• Hypopigmented skin lesions with loss of sensation: This is a hallmark sign of leprosy, caused by Mycobacterium leprae. The bacteria attack peripheral nerves, leading to sensory loss in affected areas.
• Enlarged ulnar nerves: Thickened peripheral nerves are a classic finding in leprosy, especially in the ulnar, radial, or peroneal nerves.
2. Exclusion of Other Options:
• b. Ulnar nerve neuropathy: While ulnar nerve neuropathy can cause localized symptoms, it does not present with hypopigmented skin lesions or sensory loss over multiple skin patches.
• c. Tinea corporis: This fungal infection causes well-demarcated, scaly, annular lesions but does not cause loss of sensation or nerve enlargement.
• d. Pityriasis alba: This is a benign skin condition causing hypopigmented patches, commonly in children, but it does not involve nerve thickening or sensory loss.
3. Diagnosis Confirmation:
• A skin smear or skin biopsy can confirm the presence of Mycobacterium leprae.
• Testing for loss of fine touch, pain, and temperature sensation in the lesions further supports the diagnosis.
Conclusion:
The combination of hypopigmented, anesthetic skin lesions and enlarged ulnar nerves strongly suggests leprosy.
A 29-year-old G-Il, P-I mother, who is a known
Graves’s disease patient on treatment, presented to
the regular OPD at her 36thweeks of gestation with
complaints of palpitation, nervousness, sweating,
and diarrhea of one day duration. On physical
examination, she is anxious and confused, her blood
pressure is 150/90 mmHg, pulse rate is 130/min,
respirations are 28/min, temperature is 38.3°C and
there is systolic ejection murmur at the apex. CBC
results were; hematocrit level of 39percent, WBC
count of 18 x103/mm3, and platelet count of
260x103 /mm3. What is the most likely diagnosis of
this patient?
• a. Myxedema coma
• b. Thyroid storm
c. Eclampsia
• d. Adrenal crisis
The most likely diagnosis is:
b. Thyroid storm
Explanation:
1. Key Features Supporting Thyroid Storm:
• History of Graves’ disease: This is a known hyperthyroid condition, and the patient is likely at risk for complications, especially during pregnancy.
• Acute onset symptoms: Palpitation, nervousness, sweating, diarrhea, and confusion are classic symptoms of a hypermetabolic state.
• Vital signs:
• High fever (38.3°C), tachycardia (130/min), hypertension (150/90 mmHg), and tachypnea (28/min) are hallmark signs of thyroid storm.
• Physical findings: Anxiety and confusion are common in thyroid storm, indicating CNS involvement.
• Normal CBC: Leukocytosis (WBC 18,000/mm³) and elevated hematocrit can occur due to the stress response.
2. Exclusion of Other Options:
• a. Myxedema coma: This is associated with severe hypothyroidism and presents with hypothermia, bradycardia, hypotension, and altered mental status, opposite of this patient’s presentation.
• c. Eclampsia: Typically presents with seizures and other symptoms like severe hypertension, proteinuria, and hyperreflexia, which are not described here.
• d. Adrenal crisis: Adrenal insufficiency presents with hypotension, fatigue, abdominal pain, and electrolyte imbalances, which are not consistent with this patient’s findings.
3. Thyroid Storm and Pregnancy:
• Pregnancy is a hypermetabolic state and increases the risk of thyroid storm in patients with poorly controlled Graves’ disease.
• Precipitating factors like infection, labor, or non-compliance with medication can trigger a thyroid storm.
Conclusion:
This patient’s acute hypermetabolic symptoms and history of Graves’ disease strongly suggest thyroid storm, a life-threatening emergency requiring immediate treatment with beta-blockers, antithyroid drugs, and supportive care.
A 35-year-old female patient came to a hospital with
anterior neck swelling of five years duration. Since
the last three month, she has started to experience
palpitation and has a history of hot intolerance with
no history of bone pain, cough or yellowish
discoloration of the eye. On examination, her pulse
rate is 110/min, blood pressure is 120/70mmHg,
and there is lid lag and lid retraction. On thyroid
examination, there is diffusely enlarged thyroid
measuring of 4*3cm,the lower border is reachable.
She is investigated with thyroid function test and the
results show that TSH is 0.3micro unit/mL(Normal;
0.5-5 micro unit/mL), Total T4 is 180
nmol/L(Normal; 55-150 nmol/L), Total T3 is 5
nmol/L(Normal; 1.5-3.5 nmol/L). What is the most
likely diagnosis of the patient?
• a. Toxic multinodular goiter
• b. Toxic Adenoma
• c. Graves’ disease
• d. Follicular neoplas
The most likely diagnosis is:
c. Graves’ disease
Explanation:
1. Clinical Presentation:
• Anterior neck swelling of 5 years: Suggestive of a thyroid pathology.
• Symptoms of hyperthyroidism: Palpitations, heat intolerance, and a rapid pulse (110/min) are indicative of excess thyroid hormone.
• Lid lag and lid retraction: These are signs of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, a hallmark of Graves’ disease.
2. Thyroid Examination:
• Diffuse thyroid enlargement: This is a classic finding in Graves’ disease.
• The lower border of the thyroid being reachable suggests no significant retrosternal extension.
3. Thyroid Function Test Results:
• TSH is suppressed (0.3 µU/mL): Indicates hyperthyroidism.
• Elevated T3 (5 nmol/L) and T4 (180 nmol/L): Confirms hyperthyroidism.
• T3 being disproportionately elevated compared to T4 is a pattern commonly seen in Graves’ disease.
4. Exclusion of Other Options:
• a. Toxic multinodular goiter: Typically presents in older patients with a nodular, non-diffuse thyroid gland on examination or imaging.
• b. Toxic adenoma: Causes focal hyperfunctioning nodule(s), not diffuse thyroid enlargement, and no ophthalmopathy.
• d. Follicular neoplasm: Usually presents as a solitary thyroid nodule and does not cause hyperthyroidism or ophthalmopathy.
Conclusion:
The combination of diffuse goiter, hyperthyroidism, and signs of thyroid ophthalmopathy strongly supports the diagnosis of Graves’ disease.
A 34-year-old male patient sustained stick injury to
his arm. He had pain and is unable to use his
extremity. On evaluation, his vital signs are in the
normal range. There is visible deformity and crepitus
over the left arm. Distal pulses are intact and there is
wrist drop. What is the most likely explanation for
this case?
• a. Humeral shaft fracture plus radial nerve
injury
• b. Humeral shaft fracture plus radial and ulnar
nerve injury
0 c. Humeral shaft fracture plus median nerve
injury
• d. Humeral shaft fracture plus ulnar nerve
injury
The most likely explanation is:
a. Humeral shaft fracture plus radial nerve injury
Explanation:
1. Key Findings:
• Visible deformity and crepitus: Strongly suggest a humeral shaft fracture.
• Wrist drop: This is a classic sign of radial nerve injury, as the radial nerve innervates the extensor muscles of the wrist and fingers. When injured, the patient cannot extend the wrist.
• Intact distal pulses: Indicates that major vascular structures (like the brachial artery) are not compromised.
2. Radial Nerve and Humeral Shaft Fractures:
• The radial nerve runs in the radial groove of the humerus and is susceptible to injury in humeral shaft fractures.
• Radial nerve palsy often presents with wrist drop and weakness in finger extension but does not affect sensation in the palm, as the palmar branch is supplied by other nerves.
3. Exclusion of Other Options:
• b. Humeral shaft fracture plus radial and ulnar nerve injury: Injury to both nerves would result in additional symptoms, such as sensory loss in the ulnar nerve distribution (e.g., medial hand and fingers) and claw hand deformity, which are not reported here.
• c. Humeral shaft fracture plus median nerve injury: Median nerve injury typically presents with weakness in wrist flexion, thumb opposition, or sensory loss in the lateral palm and fingers, not wrist drop.
• d. Humeral shaft fracture plus ulnar nerve injury: Ulnar nerve injury presents with sensory deficits in the medial hand and motor weakness leading to a claw hand deformity, not wrist drop.
Conclusion:
The combination of humeral shaft fracture and wrist drop strongly suggests radial nerve injury, making option a the correct answer.
A 35-year-old female patient presents with colicky
right upper quadrant abdominal pain of three
months duration. Her pain worsens when she eats
fatty meal. Since four days ago, she has persistent
right upper quadrant pain, vomiting of ingested
matter and fever. On physical examination, her blood
pressure is 100/60mmHg, pulse rate is 112/min,
temperature is 38.7 degree centigrade and she has
tenderness during inspiration on right upper
quadrant abdomen. On investigation WBC count was
12,000/mm3, and abdominal ultrasound shows gall
bladder wall of 3.5mm thick and hyperechoic lesion
with posterior shadow within it. What is the best
initial management for this patient?
• a. Maintenance fluid, keep NPO and start sips
when she tolerate
• b. Maintenance fluid, IV antibiotics, and urgent
cholecystectomy
• c. Maintenance fluid, PO antibiotics and
analgesics for seven days
• d. Maintenance fluid, IV antibiotics, analgesics
and bowel rest
The best initial management is:
b. Maintenance fluid, IV antibiotics, and urgent cholecystectomy
Explanation:
1. Clinical Presentation:
• The patient has a history of colicky right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain exacerbated by fatty meals, consistent with biliary colic due to gallstones.
• Persistent RUQ pain, fever, vomiting, and tenderness during inspiration (Murphy’s sign) suggest acute cholecystitis.
• Ultrasound findings of gallbladder wall thickening (3.5mm) and a hyperechoic lesion with posterior shadow (gallstone) confirm the diagnosis.
2. Best Management for Acute Cholecystitis:
• IV antibiotics: To treat infection caused by biliary stasis and inflammation.
• Urgent cholecystectomy: This is the definitive treatment and should ideally be performed within 24-72 hours of symptom onset to prevent complications like perforation or gangrene.
• Maintenance fluids: To address dehydration from vomiting.
• NPO (nothing by mouth): To reduce gastrointestinal stimulation until surgery.
3. Exclusion of Other Options:
• a. Maintenance fluid, keep NPO, and start sips when she tolerates: This approach neglects the need for antibiotics and definitive surgical intervention.
• c. Maintenance fluid, PO antibiotics, and analgesics for seven days: Oral antibiotics are not sufficient for acute cholecystitis, and delaying surgery increases the risk of complications.
• d. Maintenance fluid, IV antibiotics, analgesics, and bowel rest: While partially correct, this does not address the need for urgent cholecystectomy, which is the definitive treatment.
Conclusion:
The optimal initial management for this patient with acute cholecystitis is IV antibiotics, maintenance fluids, and urgent cholecystectomy to resolve the infection and prevent further complications.
A 36-year-old woman who was operated for
longstanding goiter presented to a surgical referral
clinic with paresthesias of the distal extremities,
numbness, painful muscle spasms, and seizures in
the 3rd postoperative day. What is the most likely
electrolyte abnormality in this case?
• a. Hypokalemia
• b. Hypocalcemia
• c. Hyponatremia
• d. Hypomagnesemia
The most likely electrolyte abnormality is:
b. Hypocalcemia
Explanation:
1. Post-Thyroidectomy Complication:
• Hypocalcemia is a common complication after thyroid surgery, particularly if the parathyroid glands (which regulate calcium levels) are inadvertently damaged or removed, or their blood supply is compromised.
2. Clinical Features of Hypocalcemia:
• Paresthesias (tingling, numbness) in the distal extremities.
• Painful muscle spasms (tetany), often in the hands and feet.
• Seizures.
• Trousseau’s sign: Carpal spasm induced by inflating a blood pressure cuff.
• Chvostek’s sign: Facial muscle twitching elicited by tapping the facial nerve.
3. Exclusion of Other Options:
• a. Hypokalemia: May cause muscle weakness, cramps, or arrhythmias but not paresthesias or tetany.
• c. Hyponatremia: Can cause confusion, seizures, and lethargy, but does not cause tetany or paresthesias.
• d. Hypomagnesemia: May cause neuromuscular irritability similar to hypocalcemia but is less common after thyroidectomy.
4. Underlying Mechanism:
• The parathyroid glands produce parathyroid hormone (PTH), which regulates calcium homeostasis. Post-surgical hypoparathyroidism leads to decreased serum calcium levels.
Conclusion:
The patient’s symptoms are classic for hypocalcemia, likely due to transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism following thyroid surgery.
P Flag question
A 40-year-old female patient came to an OPD with
the complaint of amenorrhea of three months
duration. She also had frequent abortion for which
she visited many private clinics and did not get cure.
She also complained hot intolerance and significant
weight loss. Her pulse rate is 120/min. On
examination, she has lid lag and exophthalmia,
diffused anterior neck swelling which moves with
respiration, and thickened skin over the dorsum of
the foot and pre-tibial region. What is the most likely
explanation for these findings?
O a. Hashimotos thyroiditis
• b. Secondary thyrotoxicosis
• c. Subacute thyroiditis
• d. Graves’ disease
The most likely explanation is:
d. Graves’ disease
Explanation:
1. Key Clinical Features:
• Amenorrhea: Can occur in hyperthyroidism due to hormonal imbalances.
• Hot intolerance and weight loss: Classic symptoms of hyperthyroidism.
• Pulse rate of 120/min: Indicates tachycardia, commonly associated with hyperthyroidism.
• Lid lag and exophthalmia: Hallmark signs of Graves’ disease, caused by thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.
• Diffuse anterior neck swelling: Suggests a diffuse goiter, typical in Graves’ disease.
• Thickened skin (pretibial myxedema): A specific sign of Graves’ disease due to dermopathy.
2. Exclusion of Other Options:
• a. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: Typically causes hypothyroidism, not hyperthyroidism. It is associated with fatigue, cold intolerance, and weight gain.
• b. Secondary thyrotoxicosis: Results from excessive TSH production (e.g., TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma) but does not usually involve ophthalmopathy or dermopathy.
• c. Subacute thyroiditis: Causes transient hyperthyroidism due to inflammation but is often painful, and it does not cause exophthalmia or pretibial myxedema.
3. Pathophysiology of Graves’ Disease:
• An autoimmune condition in which TSH receptor antibodies stimulate the thyroid gland, leading to hyperthyroidism.
• The associated ophthalmopathy and dermopathy are due to autoimmune inflammation in the orbit and skin.
Conclusion:
The combination of hyperthyroid symptoms, exophthalmia, diffuse goiter, and pretibial myxedema strongly suggests Graves’ disease.
A 48-year-old female patient was admitted to a
medical ICU with the diagnosis of NYHA Class-IV
Stage-C CHF secondary to chronic rheumatic
valvular heart disease. The physicians and nurses in
the ICU were unable to secure IV line. Where is the
most appropriate site for IV access in the patient?
a. Saphenous vein cut down
• b. Intraouseus route
• c. Scalp vein
• d. Jugular vein cut down
The most appropriate site for IV access in this patient is:
a. Saphenous vein cut down
Explanation:
1. Clinical Context:
• The patient has New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV congestive heart failure (CHF) secondary to chronic rheumatic valvular heart disease.
• In critically ill patients where peripheral IV access cannot be secured, alternative methods for vascular access must be considered.
2. Saphenous Vein Cut Down:
• This technique involves surgically exposing the greater saphenous vein at the ankle or knee for direct venous cannulation.
• It is reliable in critically ill patients when peripheral veins are not accessible due to shock or edema.
• It is commonly used in emergency situations, particularly in patients where central venous catheterization may not be feasible immediately.
3. Exclusion of Other Options:
• b. Intraosseous route: Used mainly in pediatric patients or adults during extreme emergencies (e.g., cardiac arrest). While effective for temporary access, it is not ideal for a stable patient in this scenario.
• c. Scalp vein: Typically used in neonates or infants, not adult patients.
• d. Jugular vein cut down: Although feasible, it is less commonly performed compared to saphenous vein cut down and carries a higher risk of complications, such as infection or air embolism.
Conclusion:
For a critically ill adult patient with CHF in whom peripheral IV access is not achievable, the saphenous vein cut down is the most appropriate and practical choice for securing IV access.
A 54-year-old man came to a hospital with a
compliant of vomiting of coffee ground matter of
five hours duration. He has long standing epigastric
pain, easy fatigability and dark tarry stool. At
presentation, his blood pressure is 85/60mmHg and
pulse rate is 120/min. His abdominal examination
did not reveal remarkable finding. His laboratory
findings show WBC count of 4.3X103/mm3, platelet
count of 178x103 and hemoglobin level of 7g/dl.
What is the most appropriate initial management for
the patient?
• a. Resuscitate and prepare for emergency
laparatomy
• b. Secure IV line and send for upper GI
endoscopy immediately
• c. Resuscitate with double IV line and prepare
cross matched blood
• d. Put him on maintenance fluid and do NG
tube lavage
Previous page
The most appropriate initial management for this patient is:
c. Resuscitate with double IV line and prepare cross-matched blood.
Explanation:
This patient presents with features of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, as evidenced by:
• Coffee-ground vomiting (indicates blood altered by gastric acid),
• Melena (dark tarry stools, a sign of digested blood in the GI tract),
• Hemodynamic instability (low blood pressure of 85/60 mmHg and a pulse rate of 120 bpm suggest hypovolemic shock),
• Severe anemia (hemoglobin of 7 g/dL).
Initial Management Priorities:
1. Resuscitation:
• Establish two large-bore IV lines for fluid resuscitation (e.g., isotonic crystalloids like normal saline or Ringer’s lactate) to stabilize the patient.
• Transfuse cross-matched blood as soon as available to address the anemia and ongoing blood loss.
2. Stabilization before definitive diagnosis:
• Once the patient is hemodynamically stable, an upper GI endoscopy can be performed to identify and potentially treat the source of bleeding.
• Emergency laparotomy is generally reserved for cases where endoscopy fails or the patient continues to deteriorate despite stabilization.
3. Avoid delaying resuscitation:
• Immediate endoscopy (option b) or nasogastric tube lavage (option d) without initial stabilization is inappropriate in a hemodynamically unstable patient.
Rationale for the Incorrect Options:
• a. Resuscitate and prepare for emergency laparotomy: Surgery is not the first-line management unless endoscopic interventions fail or the patient has signs of perforation or uncontrolled bleeding.
• b. Secure IV line and send for upper GI endoscopy immediately: Endoscopy should be deferred until the patient is hemodynamically stable.
• d. Put him on maintenance fluid and do NG tube lavage: Maintenance fluid alone is insufficient, and NG lavage is not an initial life-saving measure.
A 55-year-old male patient presented to an
emergency OPD with abdominal pain, distension,
vomiting and failure to pass feces and flatus of three
days duration. He had swelling on the left inguinal
region for the last five years, which failed to reduce
since four days. His physical examination results
show a blood pressure of of 100/60 mmHg, pulse
rate of 112/min, temperature of 38.1 degree
centigrade, abdomen is distended, and
hypertympanic with decreased bowel sound, and
there is a 12 cm x 15 cm non-reducible tender m a s s
on the left inguinal region. What is the most likely
diagnosis?
• a. Strangulated inguinal hernia
• b. Obstructed inguinal hernia
c. Sliding inguinal hernia
• d. Incarcerated inguinal hernia
The most likely diagnosis is:
a. Strangulated inguinal hernia.
Explanation:
The patient presents with symptoms and signs of intestinal obstruction (abdominal pain, distension, vomiting, and inability to pass feces or flatus) along with a long-standing left inguinal hernia that has become non-reducible, tender, and associated with systemic signs of infection (fever and tachycardia).
Key Differentiating Features:
1. Non-reducible and tender mass:
• Suggests that the hernia is incarcerated (contents are trapped) and possibly strangulated (compromised blood supply).
2. Systemic signs (fever, tachycardia):
• Indicate potential ischemia or necrosis of the herniated bowel contents due to strangulation.
3. Hypertympanic abdomen with decreased bowel sounds:
• Classic for intestinal obstruction caused by a hernia.
Why it is strangulated and not the other options:
• a. Strangulated inguinal hernia:
• The tenderness, systemic signs (fever, tachycardia), and inability to reduce the hernia strongly indicate strangulation, meaning the blood supply to the herniated bowel is compromised.
• This is a surgical emergency.
• b. Obstructed inguinal hernia:
• An obstructed hernia refers to bowel trapped within the hernia, causing obstruction but without vascular compromise. The systemic signs (fever, tachycardia) suggest that the hernia is more severe and likely strangulated.
• c. Sliding inguinal hernia:
• This occurs when part of the hernia sac wall includes an organ (e.g., bladder or colon), but it is not relevant in this presentation, which clearly indicates complications.
• d. Incarcerated inguinal hernia:
• An incarcerated hernia refers to a hernia that is non-reducible but without vascular compromise or systemic signs. The patient’s systemic features (fever, tachycardia) and tenderness point toward strangulation instead.
Conclusion:
The clinical presentation strongly suggests a strangulated inguinal hernia, requiring urgent surgical intervention to prevent bowel necrosis and life-threatening complications.
Irreducibility: When the contents of the sac cannot be completely emptied from the sac because of: o Adhesion formed between the contents and the sac or between the contents themselves; o Growth of the omentum within the sac; o Narrowing of the neck of the sac because of fibrosis, e.g., following continuous pressure of truss; o Retention of faeces in the large intestine occupying the sac. In a simple irreducible hernia, though the contents cannot be reduced, the blood supply remains intact, and there are no symptoms of intestinal obstruction 2. Obstruction: Irreducibility+ obstruction of the lumen of the contained bowel leading to intestinal obstruction. The features are: o The hernia is irreducible but painless. o
Cough impulse may be present. o Features of
intestinal obstruction are present. o Can precipitate strangulation if not treated early. P
Hernia is one of the commonest causes of intestinal obstruction. So, hernial sites should always be examined in a patient presenting with intestinal obstruction. 3. Strangulation: Irreducibility + features of intestinal obstruction + arrest of blood supply to the contained intestine leading to gangrene. The features are: o The hernia is irreducible and painful. o The sac is tense and tender. o Cough impulse absent. o Features of intestinal obstruction present - pain abdomen, vomiting, abdominal distension, rebound tenderness. Strangulation is more likely to happen in a hernia with a narrow neck. Most strangulated herniae are therefore either inguinal or femoral, because these herniae have narrow necks. Often, the sac contains the greater omentum which may become gangrenous due to arrest of blood supply showing the features of strangulation but without the features of intestinal obstruction. Strangulation without obstruction also noted in Richter’s hernia.
Reduction-en-masse: Sometimes, during forceful manual reduction of irreducible hernia, the contents together with the covering sac gets pushed forcibly back into the abdominal cavity; the bowel within the sac may be strangulated by the neck of the sac. Thus, the symptoms of obstruction or strangulation may not be relieved 5. Incarceration: Incarcerated hernia is a variety of irreducible hernia where the content of the sac is large gut containing faeces. The large gut is fixed in the sac because of its size or adhesions. Here, the hernia can be indented like putty with the fingertip pressure because of the scybalous content of the gut.
A 58-year-old man with abdominal distension and
pain of two weeks duration visited a hospital. He
also has blood mixed stool, tenesmus and weight
loss. He was treated for intestinal parasitosis
multiple times. On physical examination, his vital
signs were within the normal range, abdomen was
distended and hyper-tympanic, and bowel sounds
were hyperactive. His hematocrite level was
32percent. Plain abdominal X-ray showed distended
large bowel and barium enema showed apple core
appearance. What is the most likely diagnosis of the
patient?
• a. Colorectal Cancer
• b. Transverse Colon Volvulus
• c. Sigmoid Volvulus
• d. Cecal Volvulus
The most likely diagnosis is:
a. Colorectal Cancer
Explanation:
This patient presents with features suggestive of a large bowel obstruction and symptoms indicative of an underlying colorectal cancer, supported by the imaging findings.
Key Features Supporting Colorectal Cancer:
1. Blood-mixed stool and tenesmus: These are hallmark signs of colorectal cancer, especially if the tumor involves the rectum or sigmoid colon.
2. Weight loss and chronic symptoms: Unintentional weight loss and a two-week duration of symptoms are classic for malignancy.
3. Hematocrit of 32%: Suggests chronic blood loss, likely from a bleeding tumor in the colon.
4. Apple core appearance on barium enema: This is a pathognomonic finding for colorectal cancer. It results from a constricting lesion causing a narrow, irregular lumen.
Why not the other options:
• b. Transverse Colon Volvulus:
• Rare and typically presents with acute abdominal pain and obstruction symptoms. The apple core lesion would not be present.
• c. Sigmoid Volvulus:
• Commonly associated with a history of chronic constipation and elderly patients. It presents with an “omega” sign or “coffee bean” sign on imaging rather than an apple core appearance.
• d. Cecal Volvulus:
• Typically presents with acute obstruction, with imaging showing a markedly distended cecum in the upper left quadrant. The apple core appearance is inconsistent with volvulus.
Conclusion:
The apple core appearance on imaging combined with chronic symptoms, blood in the stool, and weight loss strongly point to colorectal cancer as the most likely diagnosis.
A 60-year-old male patient needs to undergo urgent
surgical intervention for small bowel obstruction. He
was on aspirin for the last three years. What is the
best component of blood that should be prepared in
this patient care?
• a. Packed RBC
• b. Cryoprecipitate
• c. Whole blood
• d. Platelet
The best component of blood to prepare for this patient is:
d. Platelet
Explanation:
This patient has been taking aspirin for the last three years. Aspirin irreversibly inhibits platelet function by inhibiting the cyclooxygenase (COX-1) enzyme, which reduces thromboxane A2 production, impairing platelet aggregation. During surgery, this can increase the risk of bleeding, even if platelet counts are normal.
Why platelet preparation is critical:
1. Aspirin’s impact on platelets:
• Aspirin-induced platelet dysfunction cannot be reversed until new platelets are produced (which takes 7–10 days).
• Transfusion of functional platelets may be necessary if excessive bleeding is anticipated or occurs during surgery.
2. Urgent surgical intervention:
• Given the need for immediate surgery, there is no time to discontinue aspirin or wait for the body to regenerate functional platelets.
Why not the other options:
• a. Packed RBC:
• Packed RBCs are used for anemia or significant blood loss. There is no indication that the patient is anemic or has already lost blood.
• b. Cryoprecipitate:
• Cryoprecipitate is rich in fibrinogen, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, and factor XIII. It is used for specific coagulation disorders, such as DIC or hypofibrinogenemia, not for platelet dysfunction.
• c. Whole blood:
• Whole blood is rarely used in modern practice and is typically reserved for massive trauma cases or where both volume and oxygen-carrying capacity are needed.
Conclusion:
Platelet transfusion is the most appropriate preparation in this patient with aspirin-induced platelet dysfunction to minimize the risk of bleeding during surgery.